• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

deepwater horizon

  • Thread starter Thread starter flfn
  • Start date Start date

flfn

Guest
Hello everyone, I'm following the disaster he's having in the gulf.
And they're talking about a 450 ton security valve, you know how it works and how big it is?



Thank you.

 
Hello everyone, I'm following the disaster he's having in the gulf.
And they're talking about a 450 ton security valve, you know how it works and how big it is?



Thank you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ixtoc_iprevious serious of equal problem.
http://www.sfsa.org/tutorias/bopplate/sbop_02.htm
http://www.osha.gov/sltc/etools/oilandgas/images/bop_stack.jpgHere are the famous bop!
http://www.deepwater.com/fw/main/deepwater-horizon-56c17.html?layoutid=17
http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/site/2931/what should happen.

Now you know almost everything I know!
:smile:

p.s.: on fb I got to exchange a chat about it with an old cad3d user.
:smile:
 
it seems confirmed that the valves were fixed and the hydraulic accumulators to command them, discharges.
and these people want to build nuclear power stations?
Bah!
 
However, it seems that the idea of using the "Soviet" option is increasingly being made:

Who's got geiger on the car tank cap?
 
But be!
We annihilate the enemy!
a nice atomic barrel and we make the well collapse and it stops everything.
But how long? And who?
The Navy? aviation? or do we give the bp bomb?

What a shame.
 
bp will make the hole;
the navy brings us over the bomb;
the genius of the army takes care of the insertion in the hole with its concrete cap;
aviation oversees and oversees from above;
"abbronzato" from the oval room of the w.h. presses the fatidic button, maybe live TV in early time, between a spot of coca cola and one of the kentucky fried chicken.
and perhaps with a written in the background "bp - beyond peteum"

so, if everything goes well, it goes to history to be the only president uses that he could press the red button without hurting anyone.

If it's okay... otherwise. . .
 
All right!
If you look now it's all blue!
:smile:
power of photo editing programs. . .
but the tg said that the "tap" is jumped and the bp will now carry out a further attempt (if I did not understand badly they want to put another valve downstream of what does not flee).
 
Is everything okay (to say), but if this incident happened to a nuclear power plant?

This is the point. a "normal" incident as severe as it can be repaired, in time or little time, with a few or so much money, but nuclear is absolute destruction. You could absolutely not go back.I would like this to be understood by our politicians, but above all by so many of us, who are in favour of nuclear energy for a dismayed confidence in technology... (Salvo mafia, camorra, earthquakes and terrorist attacks on 11 September).

I remain convinced that it is better to have a more expensive energy, which makes us all a little poorer, rather than forever destroy life on our planet.

:mixed:
 
Is everything okay (to say), but if this incident happened to a nuclear power plant?

This is the point. a "normal" incident as severe as it can be repaired, in time or little time, with a few or so much money, but nuclear is absolute destruction. You could absolutely not go back.I would like this to be understood by our politicians, but above all by so many of us, who are in favour of nuclear energy for a dismayed confidence in technology... (Salvo mafia, camorra, earthquakes and terrorist attacks on 11 September).

I remain convinced that it is better to have a more expensive energy, which makes us all a little poorer, rather than forever destroy life on our planet.

:mixed:
Can you explain to me the logical link between an oil accident and an incident at a nuclear power plant?
completely different technologies, different sectors, different environments, etc...
human error, whether related to design rather than the implementation of operational procedures, is always possible, because man by definition is not perfect and makes mistakes.
If you want to make general alarmism then you should not do anything.. .do not drive the car, do not fly, do not go by sea...any action provides a minimum risk percentage.
I am not in favor of nuclear power in Italy, now the train has been lost and above all in Italy, country in strong phase of deindustrialization, I do not sincerely see all this energy need, but sincerely your speech I did not understand.. .
 
Can you explain to me the logical link between an oil accident and an incident at a nuclear power plant?
completely different technologies, different sectors, different environments, etc...
human error, whether related to design rather than the implementation of operational procedures, is always possible, because man by definition is not perfect and makes mistakes.
If you want to make general alarmism then you should not do anything.. .do not drive the car, do not fly, do not go by sea...any action provides a minimum risk percentage.
I am not in favor of nuclear power in Italy, now the train has been lost and above all in Italy, country in strong phase of deindustrialization, I do not sincerely see all this energy need, but sincerely your speech I did not understand.. .
I think after titanic, no one can sleep quieter.
:smile:
 
Can you explain to me the logical link between an oil accident and an incident at a nuclear power plant?
completely different technologies, different sectors, different environments, etc...
human error, whether related to design rather than the implementation of operational procedures, is always possible, because man by definition is not perfect and makes mistakes.
If you want to make general alarmism then you should not do anything.. .do not drive the car, do not fly, do not go by sea...any action provides a minimum risk percentage.
I am not in favor of nuclear power in Italy, now the train has been lost and above all in Italy, country in strong phase of deindustrialization, I do not sincerely see all this energy need, but sincerely your speech I did not understand.. .
The logical connection is the accident. an accident is connected to the speech as "accident".

I repeat what I said above. any incident, though very serious, with short or long times, with small or large expenses, with adjustable damage or not, is however limited and probably overtaken or circumscribed in a certain area...

nuclear is different. With a nuclear accident, we're fucked forever. If it happens, it can't be a film to be sent back. the damage would be eternal and very serious. If there was a chain of accidents, not to exclude 100% for so many reasons, the land would be permanently destroyed.

I repeat the call to politicians and technicians with so much faith: we do not do this bullshit!!! Let's forget the nuclear until we're in time....

:eek:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
ciao
Back
Top