• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

new functions sw 2011

  • Thread starter Thread starter PiegatoreSolidworks
  • Start date Start date
English .
il troyan reggio.exe It's spreading
much better the flu at the point. .

greetings and greetings to all
Marco:smile:

I don't know anything. I'm in vacation and swx is a week I don't turn it on
Lol... . .
You're good at pulling off a little bit, I've been doing great again since Monday
trench:frown:.
-----
However, I think most of the problems are related to know.
as it suggested soliduser, I upgraded to the sp2ev, but the problem
It remains, like video above.
tomorrow, when my son comes back, I will try to install sw on his laptop
on which it has 64 bit w7.
will be the 9th test.


@piegatore... ♪
:finger:
 
What are you saying?
You never used that option otherwise you wouldn't say that.
I link 2 items made to the flight with the enabled option.http://www.3dvia.com/models/70d45c66784a5c6e/esempio-taglio-normale#
http://www.3dvia.com/models/358c112b3d0f2133/the beauty of that option is precisely the fact that it keeps the measurements of the passage
Effective you must have.
do tests, especially with high sheet thicknesses (6-8 mm) so you will be more
evident what I support.
:wink:
You are right, even in these cases the option is mandatory.
in the videos you posted immediately I was not clear about the use, but now yes.

the speech was born, because opening the bending file I noticed an improper use of some functions and options.
all this can cause unthinkable malfunctions or results.
if you start from all this, it becomes difficult at the end of the model, to understand what is the reason for the lack of flattening of the part.
until they are a dozen functions, you can waste time to find the reason, but when the pattern is a little more complex, then you put your hands in the hair, even worse if you take a pattern made by others.
We try to use the options and commands that are connected to the environment we are operating in.
it takes criterion to model, otherwise the first problem we go mad.

p.s:I don't think it's a problem of know. Did you try to erase the first function that produces a sheet and try to flatten the incriminating part?
if it works, then click on undo and try to flatten it.
the cancellation of the main function leads to a complete recalculation, more than the ctrl+q.
 
You are right, even in these cases the option is mandatory.
in the videos you posted immediately I was not clear about the use, but now yes.

p.s:I don't think it's a problem of know. Did you try to erase the first function that produces a sheet and try to flatten the incriminating part?
if it works, then click on undo and try to flatten it.
the cancellation of the main function leads to a complete recalculation, more than the ctrl+q.
I tried, nisba.
For my part, the multibody plates are bannate, I will only use them for craps, but for pieces with more than 4-5 items I don't even put on if they pay me.
more than the file weighting is almost exponential.
I repeat, perhaps in the 2013 version will be reliable, multi, but for now :36_6_3:... .

What do you use?
 
Of course I have planted a beautiful grain with my question! I should be taken as a tester of the new versions!!!!:biggrin:
 
I tried, nisba.
For my part, the multibody plates are bannate, I will only use them for craps, but for pieces with more than 4-5 items I don't even put on if they pay me.
more than the file weighting is almost exponential.
I repeat, perhaps in the 2013 version will be reliable, multi, but for now :36_6_3:... .

What do you use?
Since it is flattened on my installation, it cannot be considered a bug.
I use 64-bit win7 and 64-bit sw.
 
Since it is flattened on my installation, it cannot be considered a bug.
I use 64-bit win7 and 64-bit sw.
Thanks for the answer, tonight I agreed with my son that I would do some
evidence on his laptop... but he had quini commitments for today jumps, but tomorrow
I'm definitely trying.
Hello and thank you.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top