themole
Guest
good morning, I must create a threaded stem m20 240mm long.creo extrusion and then as I execute the threads using curves/helical spiral.pass-pass managed to explain it to me?
Look, the subject has been treated a thousand times. I want to give you the benefit of doubt:wink: why the "search" function in the forum is working as crap and you will not have found ninete despite several attempts with keywords such as "filetto, thread, screw..."good morning, I must create a threaded stem m20 240mm long.creo extrusion and then as I execute the threads using curves/helical spiral.pass-pass managed to explain it to me?
apart from thinking in terms of co-ordinax,y,z using swx, it makes me creeps (forgots of autocad, pretend that it is never hesitated) but it seems obvious that you cannot change the co-ordinate z of your triangle since this is linked to the plan on which you built it and that, while changing the sketch you can't move it.a curiosity about the threaded screw.
I was watching this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0npqkpjddi&feature=fvsra 2:34 creates a triangle to be extruded to simulate the thread.
What I ask is this:
the center of my triangle has only fields for x,y coordinates while the beginning of the thread, to which align the center of the triangle, has x,y and z coordinates
I have to edit in the triangle just the z but how do I do it?
I think you got the whole speech.apart from thinking in terms of co-ordinax,y,z using swx, it makes me creeps (forgots of autocad, pretend that it is never hesitated) but it seems obvious that you cannot change the co-ordinate z of your triangle since this is linked to the plan on which you built it and that, while changing the sketch you can't move it.
if you did the propeller at the beginning of 0° as in the video its origin coincides with the upper plane. to bring the coincidence triangle if you do not hear the end point of the propeller selects the propeller and the point of the triangle and then sets "perforated".
If it doesn't work, you have something not coincidental.
I add that I have the type that uses swx in that video works like a dog!
Place the triangle at the origin of the propeller by typing the coordinates without putting any constraint!Plus type the size of the sketches from the fields of the property manager of the entities also without putting a quota. fantastic then see it go to select by hand in the appropriate field the value to be overwritten when this is already selected by default and ready to be overwritten while it would be enough to type the new value.
already that you did us a favor, forget besides autocad also the way to manage the size and positions of the geometry in a parametric cad of that video.
There's nothing wrong with that video.I think you got the whole speech.
the difficulty in learning sw is not so much in building the piece, that at the end you do it.
the point is in doing so according to the logic of development of the program that is quite different.
for example, always the same author, in this video,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbcw3twjpvi&feature=relatedHe builds a nut and at 2:34 I don't understand what he does and how he succeeds.
that is, it builds the sweep inside the vine while being the triangle outside the propeller:
I understand that it succeeds because the function digs in the material and when digging in the vacuum obviously does not cut anything but honestly I tried but I did not succeed.
I have to try tomorrow.
cmq if you have a video more "correct" to build lives and I would like to see it.
Would you be so kind to tell me why the sweep doesn't make me do it? ?There's nothing wrong with that video.
the sweep cut must start from "outside" if not leaves a stretch of propeller
not "worked".
If you can't do that, it's just because your
cutting profile does not match the object to be cut.
for a match, instead of the sweep cut, test with sweep extrusion: you will have
the "solid" helix and you can easily check if the object is interwoven
main.
I'd love to, but you're too evolved. I stayed at 2010... :smile:Would you be so kind to tell me why the sweep doesn't make me do it? ?
Is it not that I can save you in compatible mode? ?I'd love to, but you're too evolved. I stayed at 2010... :smile:
the sketch is greater than the step of the screw... increase the step and resolve.Would you be so kind to tell me why the sweep doesn't make me do it? ?
..and with left thread. .the sketch is greater than the step of the screw... increase the step and resolve.
I also strongly recommend you to use quotas, as it is a design at risk
chronic error.
use relationships and what else... more useful to know how to fill a built nut. . . to the eye..
I guess it's a refuso and you want to write "ti Order to use quotas" :tongue:also you advice hotly to use quotas, as it is a design at risk chronic error.
You know, I'm too good.I guess it's a refuso and you want to write "ti Order to use quotas" :tongue:
before even providing solutions or help imho you have to obligate to remake the listed and bound model as you must.![]()