• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

curved repeat: instances max=1000!?!? ! ! ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter reggio
  • Start date Start date

reggio

Guest
ahhhh!!!!! :eek:
me por... putt... vigliac... zzz... purck... acc... [censura]8.000.000
:36_1_28:

I was there, good that I tried to finish my presentation and go home. .
When swx tells me that he's more than 1000 instances, he doesn't...

his only fortune is not having an ear or a protruding finger. . .

What am I going to do? a double repeat guide made not on body but on 2 or more bodies?
 
ahhhh!!!!! :eek:
me por... putt... vigliac... zzz... purck... acc... [censura]8.000.000
:36_1_28:

I was there, good that I tried to finish my presentation and go home. .
When swx tells me that he's more than 1000 instances, he doesn't...

his only fortune is not having an ear or a protruding finger. . .

What am I going to do? a double repeat guide made not on body but on 2 or more bodies?
dear reggio, you need pro/e :biggrin:
 
ahhhh!!!!! :eek:
me por... putt... vigliac... zzz... purck... acc... [censura]8.000.000
:36_1_28:

I was there, good that I tried to finish my presentation and go home. .
When swx tells me that he's more than 1000 instances, he doesn't...

his only fortune is not having an ear or a protruding finger. . .

What am I going to do? a double repeat guide made not on body but on 2 or more bodies?
azz... right now that you were able to...

Come on, don't take it, you'll see that with some subterfuge you'll be able to overcome
even this obstacle... :smile:
 
ahhhh!!!!! :eek:
me por... putt... vigliac... zzz... purck... acc... [censura]8.000.000
:36_1_28:

I was there, good that I tried to finish my presentation and go home. .
When swx tells me that he's more than 1000 instances, he doesn't...

his only fortune is not having an ear or a protruding finger. . .

What am I going to do? a double repeat guide made not on body but on 2 or more bodies?
I don't know if it's the sw or parasolid limit, but you can do a repeat.
 
dear reggio, you need pro/e :biggrin:
:d with swx I need valium ...
with some subterfuge you can overcome
This obstacle. . .
jokes, but the subterfuge (technically work aroud - translated: If you're able to get a piece of shit and shut up... I would like to say that we were looking at him... anvedi questo aoho!!!.." the accent maybe would be + French, but the juice...) is the only street with swx
I don't know if it's the sw or parasolid limit, but you can do a repeat.
... jokes aside, the super repetition of these bodies in the part, I need as a guide basis to repeat another part in the axieme; But I don't know the exact amount or step I'll need, so, usually "game" with numbers until I find the right solution... In this case the numbers aren't enough. . .
I can not use the same initial body for another repetition (making it in the opposite direction) and if I design another extrusion I will then have to "play" with step extrusions+pass repeated1+pass2 ....
if I do 2 extrusions and repeat them with only repetition but with double step, risk that overlap and I would also need to have the exact number of repetitions. . .

Boh? ? I try to see if I get an alternative idea. . .
 
:d with swx I need valium ...


jokes, but the subterfuge (technically work aroud - translated: If you're able to get a piece of shit and shut up... I would like to say that we were looking at him... anvedi questo aoho!!!.." the accent maybe would be + French, but the juice...) is the only street with swx

... jokes aside, the super repetition of these bodies in the part, I need as a guide basis to repeat another part in the axieme; But I don't know the exact amount or step I'll need, so, usually "game" with numbers until I find the right solution... In this case the numbers aren't enough. . .
I can not use the same initial body for another repetition (making it in the opposite direction) and if I design another extrusion I will then have to "play" with step extrusions+pass repeated1+pass2 ....
if I do 2 extrusions and repeat them with only repetition but with double step, risk that overlap and I would also need to have the exact number of repetitions. . .

Boh? ? I try to see if I get an alternative idea. . .
It is not always clear your intent... you always start complaining and cheating on what is really important, that is to be understood.
if the purpose of repetition is to be reused in environment together, instead of using bodies, repeat a simple surface extrusion.
I repeat, the clarity to be helped in the best way, with files or images, otherwise you go to intuition.
 
but do you want to repeat something so that after in the axieme you use repetition guided by function?
 
but do you want to repeat something so that after in the axieme you use repetition guided by function?
Yes, exactly!
It is not always clear your intent... you always start complaining and cheating on what is really important, that is to be understood.
if the purpose of repetition is to be reused in environment together, instead of using bodies, repeat a simple surface extrusion.
I repeat, the clarity to be helped in the best way, with files or images, otherwise you go to intuition.
Actually you're right, I'll let myself carry. . .

As I said, I must create a driving path in the part and then follow it from another detail in the axieme.
as you see the repetition of extrusion gives problems (that frankly I do not understand ... "some instances... not associated..." but how do you speak?), the repetition of the extrusion of the sup I have never tried (the sup I do not know them and not use them).. but then what would be the advantage of using sup instead of exstrus or body? 1000 says no?

returning to the repeat >=1000 (...if garibaldi had swx, boarded the 1000, for him there would have been no more place;-p) limits me because usually playing with numbers and options I find the correct solution, so instead I must "play" much more...
 

Attachments

  • no estrusione.webp
    no estrusione.webp
    56.5 KB · Views: 20
  • ripeti corpi.webp
    ripeti corpi.webp
    75.7 KB · Views: 25
I'm sorry, reggio, but are you sure you did everything correctly? I have no solidworks but it seems strange is what, I tried with inventor and does it without any problem of 1020 components.
Hi.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top