ful72
Guest
Well at this point it would be interesting to know who migrates where they migrate. .
excuse the game of words
Good evening
excuse the game of words
Good evening
rizzeto
Guest
cacciatorino
Guest
I'm sorry if I repeat myself but I still can't understand the purpose of sending these messages completely useless from the information point of view.
with all the sympathy for the difficult situation of t3 workers, this way of doing allusions and transversal remains is only irritating for those who do not know what they are talking about.
rizzeto
Guest
I'm sorry. I sent an absolutely clear message to ful72. saying you wait and not be in a hurry and see only what happens, since when a company is acquired at least "strange", since from the site it emerges that all the assets think3 are in the hands of a court, at least (by client and not by employee) I could expect that the acquisition can also be questioned. to be clear is of what I am talking about, and anyone can deduce it by seeing the site. what will happen bho! but to give the money at this moment I see a bet with unfair outcome. All there.
This is the meaning of my "wait and see".
I'm a client, and I don't have a glass ball.
MBT
Guest
Here. This is a clear message
"wait and see" could also be interpreted as "I know something you do not know and you will see it soon..."
MBT
Guest
ot:
wandering I saw it and I liked it
I wanted to see what effect it does...
But I think I'm going back to my portrait in a while. . .
wandering I saw it and I liked it
I wanted to see what effect it does...
But I think I'm going back to my portrait in a while. . .
Mauro:)
Guest
to all,
according to me poured himself only trying to enclosure as much as possible! !
our 6 licenses are in the auction contract until 31-dic-2012 (plss).
paid does not recognize the trade agreement signed with think3 and still wants money to provide us with updates and assistance.
As for the update to the 2011 version, among other things, I think it is a huge buffalo, I place the 2010-1 (beta) that has never been released. I bet 2011-1 is the same 2010 updated only in the version name! !
As far as we're concerned, we don't think that it's seriously willing to launch into the world of cad with software that hasn't seen any real developments for a long time!
according to me poured himself only trying to enclosure as much as possible! !
our 6 licenses are in the auction contract until 31-dic-2012 (plss).
paid does not recognize the trade agreement signed with think3 and still wants money to provide us with updates and assistance.
As for the update to the 2011 version, among other things, I think it is a huge buffalo, I place the 2010-1 (beta) that has never been released. I bet 2011-1 is the same 2010 updated only in the version name! !
As far as we're concerned, we don't think that it's seriously willing to launch into the world of cad with software that hasn't seen any real developments for a long time!
Mauro:)
Guest
... answering ful-72.. .
we are evaluating caia (we already have a license) and nx.
we are evaluating caia (we already have a license) and nx.
ful72
Guest
Here I look for people like you "maybe" who tell me their experience in the passage from think to other...you might make some mistakes less.
How do you do with .d .e2 .e3 files?
How do you do with .d .e2 .e3 files?
Mauro:)
Guest
ful 72,
working third-party accounts, fortunately we retain a copy of the project in interchange formats. In any case, we should arm ourselves with patience and transfer ours. "free" to the new software. However, I wouldn't be too scared, as both catia and nx have excellent standard libraries.
in any case it will be necessary to retain a not necessarily updated license of thinkdesign to recover to need.
years ago, we had two (actually 3) software eureka+gbg and toptron, then we abandoned toptron to pass to think3 ver.3 and we still managed to recover the work done with the latter in quite painless way.
greetings
working third-party accounts, fortunately we retain a copy of the project in interchange formats. In any case, we should arm ourselves with patience and transfer ours. "free" to the new software. However, I wouldn't be too scared, as both catia and nx have excellent standard libraries.
in any case it will be necessary to retain a not necessarily updated license of thinkdesign to recover to need.
years ago, we had two (actually 3) software eureka+gbg and toptron, then we abandoned toptron to pass to think3 ver.3 and we still managed to recover the work done with the latter in quite painless way.
greetings
ful72
Guest
Of course, if you own a large amount of 2d with so many odds, it's a bloodbath. .
Thanks mauro
Thanks mauro
Tequila
Guest
I assume it's the same blood bath as when jumping from 2d to 3d.Of course, if you own a large amount of 2d with so many odds, it's a bloodbath. .
Thanks mauro
for tables 2d the problem is the having to remake it since no cad reads the native format of another for which you have to use the classic dwg/dxf, for the models are exported in neutral formats, but also losing the tree of the features, with the current versions cad you can safely stay. the only loser is that you will have to engage time and resources to bring back a technical archive
Mauro:)
Guest
It's just like you say, tequila_pilota.
Fortunately for me, once you make the food, there are no major changes.
the boards we save them (print) always in pdf format to be sent to customers, so I can always consult them and print them without problems.
in the specific case of thinkdesign, if except the boards in the dxf format exploding the quotas (saving option) you get a pure 2d table with the odds that do not go "disguised for drawing". In this way you can manage small changes working as if we were in front of a tecnigraph. Better than nothing! However, it is unthinkable to continue managing recurring works with this system, in this case the only thing to do is to carry out the table with the new system. As for the 3d step and the parasolid of thinkdesign are quite good, the complete project with its structure of assembly passes without difficulty but of course it is static. the big job and reinvent the procedures and the now-how of the design-side-strument related to the new software, but at the bottom every now and then it is good to do a little cleaning... "To order, it takes a big mess" or not?
Fortunately for me, once you make the food, there are no major changes.
the boards we save them (print) always in pdf format to be sent to customers, so I can always consult them and print them without problems.
in the specific case of thinkdesign, if except the boards in the dxf format exploding the quotas (saving option) you get a pure 2d table with the odds that do not go "disguised for drawing". In this way you can manage small changes working as if we were in front of a tecnigraph. Better than nothing! However, it is unthinkable to continue managing recurring works with this system, in this case the only thing to do is to carry out the table with the new system. As for the 3d step and the parasolid of thinkdesign are quite good, the complete project with its structure of assembly passes without difficulty but of course it is static. the big job and reinvent the procedures and the now-how of the design-side-strument related to the new software, but at the bottom every now and then it is good to do a little cleaning... "To order, it takes a big mess" or not?
ful72
Guest
as I imagined for the 2d you have to give them back or at least requote them. give me a advice instead to which you would have to deal not so much with complex assemblies as with very complex surfaces like artistic perfumery.
Mauro:)
Guest
I'm not a big cat expert yet, but I assure you that you can do what you want. is widely used in both automotive and aerospace sectors. is also used for modeling jewelry to be produced in series. Also nx is a great program, along with catia stà in the highest part of the market. Obviously the costs are higher than thinkdesign but if you want to change in better... it is also to be evaluated the pdm-plm speech always if you use it. nx maintains a certain continuity between versions. catia, however, until now, tends to make a "zero point" and to propose a new version that is actually a new software, see v3, v4, v5 and is already ready v6. from catia v6 it will be obligatory to work with its plm with a lot of merits, management documents, revisions, coding.... but also some negative side for the small reality and that is greater costs related to the maintenance of a plm.
nx, instead it can work even without plm, always for those who can or want to make it less... but it is a sin. If you want to save a little something, I think you could show you solid-edge, the latest versions include remarkable improvements in skin manipulation (or surfaces), it is the younger brother of nx and losing it retains good compatibility with the latter. As for the technical part of the mould, I'm sure it's your case, but you know better than me what the complexity of your aesthetic surfaces is. Why don't you make a good demo with your files?
rizzeto
Guest
advice: you should have received an email from the banker. tell him this thing
Mauro:)
Guest
... you're right "rezzetto" I received so many emails from them that almost marks them as spam... The problem is that it is paid to provide me with assistance now those few people who are found do not want to feel right. Moreover, between what was left of think3 and poured there is a lot of tension, according to my humble opinion it seems that poured has "disciplined" think3. In fact, I'm just a technician and the administrative side are directly dealing with the owners, who I think are likely to act by legal means. Will it be a fight against the windmills?
JCougar
Guest
thanks for the comfort. expressing feelings is the son of facts happened in the years of t3, great solidarity and participation and then transmuting into straw fire as well thanks to those who always fall standing. if some colleagues create an open-mind company that develops the cam based think3 (in case the ip is excluded from bankruptcy constraints for source codes already deposited as a contractual clause) is good? for customers who will migrate to open-mind and see continuity in their investment. less well for those from this new corporate operation is excluded, and not even called into question, seeing evaporate their labors. always true the saying "in work never friends"
The_Matrix
Guest
I already like you. :finger: alcohol:
today I was from our client who also has some gbg stations, which would never turn off. . .
Now it turns out. .