• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

weight management

  • Thread starter Thread starter ceschi1959
  • Start date Start date
you know that matrix likes to talk to acronyms.
ootb = out of the box is a term used to mean that the features it is in the program and therefore do not require customization or manipulation of any other kind.
Thank you for this public service.
if someone wants to culture on acronyms there are appropriate websites
for example this:http://www.acronyma.com/?language=itthat also gives you the possibility to choose the language
 
from 6/9 can we use nx8??? I can't believe it... finally we could do the smooth curve (oops....optimize curves)!
If you were able to use ug you would know that you can do even in nx7.5, ask your colleagues how we had done on the parametric port bone (in nx2 in 2005).
ask for an owl, maybe. .

sure, with the nx8 the smooth becomes a "operator" that can be explicitly called in the history of features
 
:biggrin: don't even tell the matrix otherwise it makes a personal matter ...:biggrin:
I and my dark half (ugoverall) have long stopped making personal issues. . .
You have to know, dear tequila, that nx does not do everything to the maximum.. .
There are things in which it is very strong, others in which it is not.
You know what comforts me?
- that the things in which nx is not the maximum are "cosmetic" craps that can be implemented in a short time (like this of the weights in the cartilages) or be covered with small macros (as we have done until now just for this case)
- the things in which nx is the maximum are not bullshit and to implement them other systems (especially mid-range) must spit tears and blood.
the same consideration of nx applies to catia.
It is not a case that those who make complex products have 90% of nx and catia cases.

Hi.
 
commands to radiate curves exist.
he means something else already present but improved with nx5 style menu onwards.
means an operator taking a curve, output of a function (intersection... offset in face... offset... extract of the edge of a composite extension... etc.) and make it more "sofficie" as pattern so that later functions are supported by a better quality mathematics.
when it comes to handling "template" (and procatug refers to this), especially in the white body, there is the unknown surfaces and curves of style that you never know how they will come.
 
I and my dark half (ugoverall) have long stopped making personal issues. . .
You have to know, dear tequila, that nx does not do everything to the maximum.. .
There are things in which it is very strong, others in which it is not.
You know what comforts me?
- that the things in which nx is not the maximum are "cosmetic" craps that can be implemented in a short time (like this of the weights in the cartilages) or be covered with small macros (as we have done until now just for this case)
- the things in which nx is the maximum are not bullshit and to implement them other systems (especially mid-range) must spit tears and blood.
the same consideration of nx applies to catia.
It is not a case that those who make complex products have 90% of nx and catia cases.

Hi.
I don't want to make any arguments (I recommend, eh:finger:).

among other things there are a mountain of things that solid (pause reflective) anddddge does not, they will also be "cosmetic cups" as you say, but that if they were implemented and/or corrected by the mammina zimmenz we poor "keys" we will try to invest more time in design and not in correlation of designs and models because editating and updating them we lose by road quotas, notes. Unfortunately, not all companies in the globe work only on 3d models, but from what I know the vast majority still use the prehistoric 2d tables and often and willingly for example breaks me ba**** and hear me say that the scale indicated in the cartiglio is not correct compared to the design.... ssii I do not know how to manage this but on the little brother have implemented a straw for a few years (after decades that users begged on their knees on the chickpeas) that puts the value of the model scale as soon as you put it on the table, if in a second moment change the scale to the model, the call on the cartiglio remains unchanged and you have to edit it to the click ring with the "tope".

then that enneicccsss manages to make me supercomplete surfaces only by talking to the pigs as the picard commandant on enterprise ncc-1701d (class galaxy) or the most recent and (class sovereign), I know well and the difference of cost between enneicccss and solideddegge is justified :eek:

ps: since you work in mom zimmens you put a good word on the problem of tangent bodies (not manifold) because every time you waste time and piss me off when amount of files of other cad (also nx!!!!!) because it creates a "x" elevated to "n" of copies parts, surfaces etc. you have no idea what amount of blasphemy and time you have to lose for these things.... and have years we ask it .
I broke up and I deliberately overtaken retailer/assistance/home mother zimens Italian/house mother zimens European/house mother zimens American/gtac and who more has more put it and I wrote directly to d. staples who kindly answered me telling me that some things I proposed were interesting and would have communicated to his team, others were to the vaglio of corrections (you do not know

nb: with quantity of "bestemmies" read 1 for each grain of sand of the universe.

attention: It's a little rash and not a personal matter.
 
... prehistoric tables 2d and often and willingly for example breaks me ba**** and hear me say that the scale indicated in the cartiglio is not correct compared to the drawing.... ssii I do not know how to manage this but on the little brother have implemented a straw for a few years (after decades that users begged on their knees on the chickpeas) that puts the value of the model scale as soon as you put it on the table, if in a second moment change the scale to the model, the call on the cartiglio remains unchanged and you have to edit it to the click ring with the "tope". ...
I autoquote this part of the message because I re-read the answer mail dan about this thing.
reply: sheet scale – in st4 we tie sheet scale to the first drawing view. so this should solve the problem you mention
 
I don't want to make any arguments (I recommend, eh:finger:).

among other things there are a mountain of things that solid (pause reflective) anddddge does not, they will also be "cosmetic cups" as you say, but that if they were implemented and/or corrected by the mammina zimmenz we poor "keys" we will try to invest more time in design and not in correlation of designs and models because editating and updating them we lose by road quotas, notes. Unfortunately, not all companies in the globe work only on 3d models, but from what I know the vast majority still use the prehistoric 2d tables and often and willingly for example breaks me ba**** and hear me say that the scale indicated in the cartiglio is not correct compared to the design.... ssii I do not know how to manage this but on the little brother have implemented a straw for a few years (after decades that users begged on their knees on the chickpeas) that puts the value of the model scale as soon as you put it on the table, if in a second moment change the scale to the model, the call on the cartiglio remains unchanged and you have to edit it to the click ring with the "tope".

then that enneicccsss manages to make me supercomplete surfaces only by talking to the pigs as the picard commandant on enterprise ncc-1701d (class galaxy) or the most recent and (class sovereign), I know well and the difference of cost between enneicccss and solideddegge is justified :eek:

ps: since you work in mom zimmens you put a good word on the problem of tangent bodies (not manifold) because every time you waste time and piss me off when amount of files of other cad (also nx!!!!!) because it creates a "x" elevated to "n" of copies parts, surfaces etc. you have no idea what amount of blasphemy and time you have to lose for these things.... and have years we ask it .
I broke up and I deliberately overtaken retailer/assistance/home mother zimens Italian/house mother zimens European/house mother zimens American/gtac and who more has more put it and I wrote directly to d. staples who kindly answered me telling me that some things I proposed were interesting and would have communicated to his team, others were to the vaglio of corrections (you do not know

nb: with quantity of "bestemmies" read 1 for each grain of sand of the universe.

attention: It's a little rash and not a personal matter.
yellow/tequila... :finger:
we are also friends on facebook! You don't even have to think I want to argue.
Unfortunately, sometimes, it is not that the level of one thing is proportional to its value.
For example I have an a5 that costs a sproposito. . .
And...
- he doesn't have usb entrance.
- does not have the ships (and if I want it I have to cum 3000 and whistle €)
- has no rain sensor
- has no light sensor
- he doesn't have automatic windings.
- has a really basic radio that misses the dvds, only the cds
What do I tell you?
I bought it for other reasons that transcend from the pure price/contained budget... If that was my priority, I would have chosen a mondean ford or a peugeot and spent 40% less.

in the cad is the same....
it is not said that catia or nx, only because they are high level we have everything that has swx/se/inventor and in + the "power when needed" and the "absolute control".
But as soon as we want to close the "gap" we do it quickly... see nx8 for carts... dxf... routing mechanical... 2d... ship design... etc.

Hi. :wink:

ps. I will hire you (you, usernx, etc) in siemens as soon as I can... You're the kind of people we need. .
 
yellow/tequila... :finger:
we are also friends on facebook! You don't even have to think I want to argue.
Unfortunately, sometimes, it is not that the level of one thing is proportional to its value.
For example I have an a5 that costs a sproposito. . .
And...
- he doesn't have usb entrance.
- does not have the ships (and if I want it I have to cum 3000 and whistle €)
- has no rain sensor
- has no light sensor
- he doesn't have automatic windings.
- has a really basic radio that misses the dvds, only the cds
What do I tell you?
I bought it for other reasons that transcend from the pure price/contained budget... If that was my priority, I would have chosen a mondean ford or a peugeot and spent 40% less.

in the cad is the same....
it is not said that catia or nx, only because they are high level we have everything that has swx/se/inventor and in + the "power when needed" and the "absolute control".
But as soon as we want to close the "gap" we do it quickly... see nx8 for carts... dxf... routing mechanical... 2d... ship design... etc.

Hi. :wink:

ps. I will hire you (you, usernx, etc) in siemens as soon as I can... You're the kind of people we need. .
How heavy are you? :-)
 
How heavy are you? :-)
i know it...
now i weight more than 90kg... us food is not good for mantaining my previous shape. :tongue:

... and, all the others (utentenx, tequila, procatug, etc) are continuously pointing me! :angry: i don't know why! i'm so smooth!!!! :biggrin:
 
i know it...
now i weight more than 90kg... us food is not good for mantaining my previous shape.

... and, all the others (utentenx, tequila, procatug, etc) are continuously pointing me! :angry: i don't know why! i'm so smooth!!!! :biggrin:
noooo da io ti punzecchio to stimulate you to ask the zimmens new implementations. ..:biggrin: however for the weight I am 120kg :eek: a nice little in meat even if I am high 1.90 (I have to put to dietaaaa)
 
noooo da io ti punzecchio to stimulate you to ask the zimmens new implementations. ..:biggrin: however for the weight I am 120kg :eek: a nice little in meat even if I am high 1.90 (I have to put to dietaaaa)
but you must be on a diet! !
I am today:
- breakfast: fruit plate (oranges/ananas) + milk and cereal
- lunch: pizza pepperoni (Americans define "pizza pepperoni" that with spicy salami... cmq, good) and diet pepsi. I wanted a salad, but as we have a lot to do we ate in the office
- Let's see. I'm out now (hours 20:40 from office)
:frown:
 
Bye to all,
and thanks for the kind answers on the discussion 'weight management'.
I know that:
the_matrix struggles to manage his cause pizza pepperoni and difficulty to put it directly in the cartiglio as the ootb solution for managing pizza orders and soft drinks you will have not before nx 9.5:smile:
tequila_pilota quota over the three digits in kg causes non manifold at lunch and dinner, problem that zimmenz has defined c....s... (you will not find the acronym!!!):rolleyes:
it is only necessary to enter into the discussion by providing my data as well:
three figures also for me (mystery for charity of fatherland given exact), problem that, reported as I, became an er for the next versions: seems that from nx 8.3.3.x you will have to use the mouse alternately with the right and left hand applying a force of about 3000 n
I think we need some vacations all!!! :finger:
 
i know it...
now i weight more than 90kg... us food is not good for mantaining my previous shape. :tongue:

... and, all the others (utentenx, tequila, procatug, etc) are continuously pointing me! i don't know why! i'm so smooth!!!!
and you want to go to detroit to make the brilliant? Here's the result. .
Americans want to reduce engine displacement, but first they should reduce their own. .
noooo da io ti punzecchio to stimulate you to ask the zimmens new implementations. ..:biggrin: however for the weight I am 120kg :eek: a nice little in meat even if I am high 1.90 (I have to put to dietaaaa)
azz imposing tequila, I do not know why but I imagined you more slender, so if one day we will meet with birth with the precondition of not pissing you off, if not you rebound.:wink:
 
returning it, as soon as I reinstall the nx8, I make a test... I had a very old beta version and now maybe I miss it works more...
or I'll wait for the official one, so much between being here on vacation. September 6 is tomorrow.
I'm going to sleep, so I'm expecting one of those bad days tomorrow. . .
:mad:
 
Hello procatug.. .
you could have left your message:

"and that's what it's also for. .be parametric means having all the operations in the part navigator and not cutting the legs with operations that eliminate the parameters (it also happened with the divide curves)...but I see that offending has become the national sport. . .Lastly we are showing some combination of commands even to personal siemens... . :eek: "

(if you took it from you)
I'm not offended.
the join operator is parametric and makes a smooth curves, if used correctly.
Of course, it costs a minimum of effort to understand how to set tolerance in the individual case.
... and it's hard to understand whether it's the case of inserting it or not.

on the fact of teaching also to staff siemens:
1) depends on who you are
2) there is always to learn in life... I could teach a fiat designer how to better realize the inner couple of a car... ;)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top