• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

"sponse of the framework" command

  • Thread starter Thread starter cacciatorino
  • Start date Start date
the views are multiple, it is difficult to establish the demarcation line between right and wrong. "soption" of projects by employees in large companies? I have seen several companies in which on each workstation the storage peripherals were eliminated, no fd, no cd, no usb, and also there was a delegate who had to manage the computer archive in and out. the problem had therefore been solved in these terms. and then in the end everything must by force of things converge to a standard, so those who establish the guidelines are great as ptc, dassault and siemens. It's sad but true. others must "uniform". This is my pov ;)
 
other concrete and useful case in which osd is the top of art: a company sent me a step of a sw-made packaging for a first evaluation and estimate, saying to wait for why they have to reduce the width, but I with the "fv box" I have already done it in 2 seconds.

according to what I said, "What I've lost so far not to know this command is very powerful! :-
 
cacciatorino said:
No, this is not possible because I have to continuously access the database for questions or reuse of library parts.

p.s. better explain:

The problem is that the model manager database is encrypted. When I work with solid edge, I replicated the library file folder on my server, which are simple side files. being clearly visible on the file system, I don't need to question the sql server to know that the part "vite teci m8x16" corresponds to the file d:/cocreate/file_storage/xwtr34/asq3w/pokrte/45lkipe.sdp.
with solid edge or solidworks I simply take it from the folder d:/libreria/viti/tcei/ and drag it into the cad.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure I understand, the encrypted database is that of mm or "quel" mm, I don't think standard mm uses encrypt the drawing archive.
 
Polymar said:
... is how to associate the parameters (parlando alla proe) to each single part/axieme.
Click to expand...
I don't know what you want to do.

in the chart see position/name/quantity is often insufficient, and to customize some characteristics of osd you have to jump to headfit on the lisp almost as if they say "ok, do you want to customize your projects? alone you cannot do it, turn to a company that advises you ...", but this attitude has also decreed the end of eit,
Click to expand...
Unfortunately this is the legacy left by the dna hp, where osd was born, a commercial philosophy "to the ibm" that only served to create turnover for the third parties.
 
Er Presidente said:
I'm not sure I understand, the encrypted database is that of mm or "quel" mm, I don't think standard mm uses encrypt the drawing archive.
Click to expand...
I didn't mean encrypted, but in the sense that the files don't have extension and the name doesn't call anything intelligible, as well as directories. In this way the only way to pull on a part or together is through the sql, which interfaces between the user and the file system.
 

Attachments

  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    69 KB · Views: 8
I don't know what you want to do.
Click to expand...
in fact I have expressed very bad how much I wanted to say it is very simple: excluding the use of a pdm/plm, it would be very useful to associate to each part or together of the numerical/stringa fields (such as the values that are inserted in the table parameters of the proes) in which to write certain information that can be the most disparate (replaces the, replaced by, superficial treatment, author, etc etc etc). I tried to figure out how to do such an operation, and if I'm not mistaken, you have to put heavy hand on the lisp. at the level of graphic interface gui, ... nothing ... absolutely :(
 
Polymar said:
in fact I have expressed very bad how much I wanted to say it is very simple: excluding the use of a pdm/plm, it would be very useful to associate to each part or together of the numerical/stringa fields (such as the values that are inserted in the table parameters of the proes) in which to write certain information that can be the most disparate (replaces the, replaced by, superficial treatment, author, etc etc etc). I tried to figure out how to do such an operation, and if I'm not mistaken, you have to put heavy hand on the lisp. at the level of graphic interface gui, ... nothing ... absolutely :(
Click to expand...
I advertise my cocreate var, see if this software can be useful to your case:
http://www.shsistemi.it/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=626:management-data-cad&itemid=239They told me that they developed it for small companies that do not have pdm, and it should cost a reasonable figure.
 
Unfortunately this is the legacy left by the dna hp, where osd was born, a commercial philosophy "to the ibm" that only served to create turnover for the third parties.
Click to expand...
. as not to give you reason, I remember that when we bought osd 2000, the program was "strongly" combined with a hp workstation that cost a boat of money. but at least the ignition of the computer you saw the hp logo, and you found it on the mouse mat at 3 buttons :) and how not to pay attention to the keyboard so heavy that it seemed filled with lead ... and if you wonder how the computer cost so much, they responded to you that osd needed a super graphic board to the cube that not even the nasa had ... cmq those kinds there (you already understood who But after that, you want someone to wake up? Well, answering would be nothing. I certainly do not deny the fact that from the commercial point of view we were able to do, the alliance with trumpf ( laser machines + bending machines) allowed him to associate each cnc machine sold with a hp+osd workstation because the sm had been developed together from the two houses. and in my area, where trumpf means prestige and quality at the highest levels, still most carpenters use osd :)
 
cacciatorino said:
I didn't mean encrypted, but in the sense that the files don't have extension and the name doesn't call anything intelligible, as well as directories. In this way the only way to pull on a part or together is through the sql, which interfaces between the user and the file system.
Click to expand...
Now I don't want to remember badly but mm can also be configured to work on "Classical" folders.
 
cacciatorino said:
system conflict

system conflict

system conflict

system conflict

system conflict

system conflict


Let's start with the right foot this morning.... :wink:
Click to expand...
But who's "talk", osd or pdm?
It seems to me the typical Ip conflict message on the net, so "nose."
 
Er Presidente said:
But who's "talk", osd or pdm?
It seems to me the typical Ip conflict message on the net, so "nose."
Click to expand...
No, it's just that I saved on the mm database yesterday, and then I saved the pkg locally. This morning I reloaded the local pkg to make first and second model managers the parts on the database and those drawn up from the pkg, although having the same id, are different parts, from which its being puzzled due to the seeing two different parts (one local and one on the db) with the same id.
 
cacciatorino said:
No, it's just that I saved on the mm database yesterday, and then I saved the pkg locally. This morning I reloaded the local pkg to make first and second model managers the parts on the database and those drawn up from the pkg, although having the same id, are different parts, from which its being puzzled due to the seeing two different parts (one local and one on the db) with the same id.
Click to expand...
Wait, wait, go too strong...
if you load before that of the pkg the mm gets pissed?
 
Er Presidente said:
Wait, wait, go too strong...
if you load before that of the pkg the mm gets pissed?
Click to expand...
I try to explain better, that maybe I had been too turbulent:
you know that I work on "slow line", i.e. loading and saving files from a remote mm server. Then what do I do: I work all day saving on mm, and it's okay because every time I save only the modified or new files, which are only a few kb each time.

The problem is when I have to get all the asses up in the morning to start working. being about 200 mb of files, the time required is really long. then to limit this time what you do: in the evening, after saving on mm, I also make a pkg copy on the local disk, and in the morning after starting cad and mm, I load the pkg.

with v17 this thing works perfectly: mm seamlessly aligns the ids of the parts on the database with the ids of the parts in the pkg. With the v16 I am using now instead the thing has problems, and sometimes the ids on mm are not recognized as equal to ids in the pkg, from which the conflicts of id signaled by mm.
 
cacciatorino said:
I try to explain better, that maybe I had been too turbulent:
you know that I work on "slow line", i.e. loading and saving files from a remote mm server. Then what do I do: I work all day saving on mm, and it's okay because every time I save only the modified or new files, which are only a few kb each time.

The problem is when I have to get all the asses up in the morning to start working. being about 200 mb of files, the time required is really long. then to limit this time what you do: in the evening, after saving on mm, I also make a pkg copy on the local disk, and in the morning after starting cad and mm, I load the pkg.

with v17 this thing works perfectly: mm seamlessly aligns the ids of the parts on the database with the ids of the parts in the pkg. With the v16 I am using now instead the thing has problems, and sometimes the ids on mm are not recognized as equal to ids in the pkg, from which the conflicts of id signaled by mm.
Click to expand...
hmmm, if it's the d osd version then, theoretically, the same pkg saved with 16 in the evening and reloaded with 17 in the morning should work, right?
 
Er Presidente said:
hmmm, if it's the d osd version then, theoretically, the same pkg saved with 16 in the evening and reloaded with 17 in the morning should work, right?
Click to expand...
I don't know, I can't do evidence because the database I collect is in version 16.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top