TECNOMODEL
Guest
I downloaded the free version (2 axes and 1/2) of the integrated cam in inventor 2015.
Does anyone use it? opinions?
Does anyone use it? opinions?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Tarkus
Guest
I didn't even know it existed, where did you dump him?
TECNOMODEL
Guest
the technician who gave us the course, is included in the license 2015.
I don't know if there was any new use of inventor.
Monday place the link, you have to register and arrive an email with the activation code to insert when you install.
I don't know if there was any new use of inventor.
Monday place the link, you have to register and arrive an email with the activation code to insert when you install.
Tarkus
Guest
Okay, thanks, I'll wait Monday.
Tarkus
Guest
I didn't wait till Monday.
download from http://cam.autodesk.com/get-inventor-hsm-express/installed and tried to use, (not in the car yet).
seems intuitive and obviously follows any variations on the model.
remains to be seen once brought the .nc file in the machine, the various problems post processor, finishing and incompatibility various.. .
download from http://cam.autodesk.com/get-inventor-hsm-express/installed and tried to use, (not in the car yet).
seems intuitive and obviously follows any variations on the model.
remains to be seen once brought the .nc file in the machine, the various problems post processor, finishing and incompatibility various.. .
TECNOMODEL
Guest
You anticipated me. ...
At first glance it seems intuitive, I did a test by doing the post processor for a car we have in the company and it seems to write everything as it should.
we are evaluating a small course to start using it, though if someone has indications on available material would be a welcome info.
of course also some opinion on how it works is well accepted.
At first glance it seems intuitive, I did a test by doing the post processor for a car we have in the company and it seems to write everything as it should.
we are evaluating a small course to start using it, though if someone has indications on available material would be a welcome info.
of course also some opinion on how it works is well accepted.
Tarkus
Guest
What's on your car?You anticipated me. ...
At first glance it seems intuitive, I did a test by doing the post processor for a car we have in the company and it seems to write everything as it should.
we are evaluating a small course to start using it, though if someone has indications on available material would be a welcome info.
of course also some opinion on how it works is well accepted.
I have a fanuc, as soon as I have 10 minutes I try to drive a little program, using the post processor in the program.
I currently use hypermill, but I only have 3 axes.
I also want to hear the autodesk dealer about the 3+2 axes version, which costs 7.500 eurons including inventor.
but who, like us inventor already has it how much it should spend?
TECNOMODEL
Guest
we have all mazak machines, of which a date on which I made a program run using the generic mazak post processor.
for the costs I have no idea, probably for us would be sufficient the free version, at least as the first step.
for the costs I have no idea, probably for us would be sufficient the free version, at least as the first step.
Luke
Guest
Hello.
Since it comes free with inventor 2015, I proposed it in the company where I work, we recently started using it; we have a cnc 3 axes fanuc.
Sometimes you struggle a bit to figure out how to select the geometries to generate the tool path, but I think you only need to learn to use it. . .
the only complaint of the cnc operator that uses it is that it is only in English and it seems not imminent a translation in Italian. I found the localization files and thought I'd try to translate them but they're about 400 strings. . .
If anyone cares you could split the job, if we were 8-10 wouldn't be a great job!
Since it comes free with inventor 2015, I proposed it in the company where I work, we recently started using it; we have a cnc 3 axes fanuc.
Sometimes you struggle a bit to figure out how to select the geometries to generate the tool path, but I think you only need to learn to use it. . .
the only complaint of the cnc operator that uses it is that it is only in English and it seems not imminent a translation in Italian. I found the localization files and thought I'd try to translate them but they're about 400 strings. . .
If anyone cares you could split the job, if we were 8-10 wouldn't be a great job!
TECNOMODEL
Guest
in the week I will make a day of course then we will begin to use it.Hello.
Since it comes free with inventor 2015, I proposed it in the company where I work, we recently started using it; we have a cnc 3 axes fanuc.
Sometimes you struggle a bit to figure out how to select the geometries to generate the tool path, but I think you only need to learn to use it. . .
the only complaint of the cnc operator that uses it is that it is only in English and it seems not imminent a translation in Italian. I found the localization files and thought I'd try to translate them but they're about 400 strings. . .
If anyone cares you could split the job, if we were 8-10 wouldn't be a great job!
Initially only for some prototypes, I do not know how much I will use it.
the operator who is using it what judgment does it give?
Is it so problematic that he's just in English?
about the files you want to translate, would it be to do the job and upload them again to have the cam in Italian?
Tarkus
Guest
azz, to me it seems much more immediate and intuitive than hypermill, especially for the selection of geometries.Hello.
...................................................................................... sometimes you struggle a little to understand how to select geometries to generate the tool path, but I think you only need to learn how to use it. . .
. . . . . . . . !
of course hypermill has other qualities (and 10,000 more than I spent at its time).
But I like this hsm.
I'm thinking about starting using it for the simplest pieces where there are no surfaces or other interpolations.....
@tecnomodel:
Does the course make you self-desk?
My retailer seemed a bit shy about the courses, it seemed a little bit flattered on the subject.
TECNOMODEL
Guest
the course we activated it through the license dealer, so I would say it is personal autodesk.azz, to me it seems much more immediate and intuitive than hypermill, especially for the selection of geometries.
of course hypermill has other qualities (and 10,000 more than I spent at its time).
But I like this hsm.
I'm thinking about starting using it for the simplest pieces where there are no surfaces or other interpolations.....
@tecnomodel:
Does the course make you self-desk?
My retailer seemed a bit shy about the courses, it seemed a little bit flattered on the subject.
TECNOMODEL
Guest
Hello tarkus, yesterday I did the course on hsm.
In fact it is not held by self-desk staff, even for them the cam is a novelty and lean on an outside.
I confirm the simplicity of use of this cam, also to be a 2d 1/2 has uncommon options in other cads like that.
Are you using it?
In fact it is not held by self-desk staff, even for them the cam is a novelty and lean on an outside.
I confirm the simplicity of use of this cam, also to be a 2d 1/2 has uncommon options in other cads like that.
Are you using it?
Tarkus
Guest
Yes,
as already said use for pieces where it is obviously enough 2+1.
It is much more intuitive and quicker than my hypermill, I find perhaps some difficulty in setting the plans, or rather,
Sometimes I close the processing of a cycle signaling error because "appearingly" there is the height of a plan that is not good.
I seem to say why p.e. lately I had to give an overmetal of 0,00001 in z in the working of a pocket,
because if I just gave zero, it made me mistake.
as already said use for pieces where it is obviously enough 2+1.
It is much more intuitive and quicker than my hypermill, I find perhaps some difficulty in setting the plans, or rather,
Sometimes I close the processing of a cycle signaling error because "appearingly" there is the height of a plan that is not good.
I seem to say why p.e. lately I had to give an overmetal of 0,00001 in z in the working of a pocket,
because if I just gave zero, it made me mistake.
TECNOMODEL
Guest
when you define the crude of a cylindrical piece in the tab "stock" do you have the option relative to the cylinders?
I only have "fixed size box" and "relative size box", the technician was not sure if in 2d 1/2 there are also options for the cylinder or if they are only in 3d
I only have "fixed size box" and "relative size box", the technician was not sure if in 2d 1/2 there are also options for the cylinder or if they are only in 3d
Tarkus
Guest
I confirm, no cylinder, but it is a lack, I should be able to make 21/2 machining on a cylindrical crude, no?
But don't look in the mouth
But don't look in the mouth
Tarkus
Guest
question:
to make bevels on a profile what to use?
the only tool that makes me use a 90° brake is the "trace", but it only makes me work in the middle piece, I would like to work in offset of a few millimeters from the center.
in trace->passes->chamfer there are the options width (the bevel) and offset, which from the image that appears looks to be my case, but in fact does not give results.
p.s. for the mod.
If you continue like this, will you have to make a sub forum?
to make bevels on a profile what to use?
the only tool that makes me use a 90° brake is the "trace", but it only makes me work in the middle piece, I would like to work in offset of a few millimeters from the center.
in trace->passes->chamfer there are the options width (the bevel) and offset, which from the image that appears looks to be my case, but in fact does not give results.
p.s. for the mod.
If you continue like this, will you have to make a sub forum?
TECNOMODEL
Guest
I did a test with contour 2d, from there you can select a edge if in the model you do not have the bevel and set depth of the bevel and offset to use on the tool.question:
to make bevels on a profile what to use?
the only tool that makes me use a 90° brake is the "trace", but it only makes me work in the middle piece, I would like to work in offset of a few millimeters from the center.
in trace->passes->chamfer there are the options width (the bevel) and offset, which from the image that appears looks to be my case, but in fact does not give results.
p.s. for the mod.
If you continue like this, will you have to make a sub forum?
in that way you can work on the side of the tool at 45° and not always on the initial edge.
stefanobruno
Guest
I think we leave it here, so soon it ends:36_1_15:p.s. for the mod.
If you continue like this, will you have to make a sub forum?
I think if you need a cam it is better to turn to someone who has done it for a lifetime.
Maybe for some carpenter, who knows?
All this I say is having read this discussion, I do not know the product and I do not intend to make it known, it is not my field.
Tarkus
Guest
I got the cam.I think we leave it here, so soon it ends:36_1_15:
I think if you need a cam it is better to turn to someone who has done it for a lifetime.
Maybe for some carpenter, who knows?
All this I say is having read this discussion, I do not know the product and I do not intend to make it known, it is not my field.
only that this, even with its limits is simpler to use, is parametric, and it is free, I do not have to pay double sub (hypermill +inv).
If it seems short to you...