I do this example. I am your client, I come to you and I ask you to do an urgent job that will take you all day for 8 hours. at the end instead of being grateful for your availability, I give you 64 euros. I presume to pay 8 euro/hour, which I think is the cost of a designer. I don’t want to pay the costs you support for the study, software, computers, taxes and everything else because these costs you pay them regardless of the single day you dedicated to me.
But my client could tell me, why do I have to pay your software license when I already have to pay what I'm letting you do the job? However, we can discuss the subject of fixed costs, and indeed in the accounts I did after I entered them, but they must be calculated adequately and not in such an unfair way as to the reimbursement.
on this you can inform you, but I really believe that unless otherwise agreement are employee cabbage.
I don't understand. returning to the case. if the car is of the employee, the employer what does it lend?
the home-office route could (if there is availability) do so by public transport, or by foot/by. He could also sleep in the tent in the sidewalk, absurdly. You don't make a difference. You care that he's there at 8:00 a.m. and he's out of the groin at 5:00 p.m. as this happens, they are his problems.
it would be as if the customer charged the cost of the cad license of my office, when my employee during the transfer is using the client's license. Then the client would tell me: "I'm already paying for the depreciation of the license that's using your employee, do I have to pay for the license he's not using? ? ? "
I mean, "shit," Suca, I got a few typings, I apologize, but I can't edit the message.
with today's customers, both words would be correct
I would also like to know the source of that news.
in friuli, in the areas close to the Austrian and Slovenian border, we have the gasoline facilitated
If it is not mistaken, it is border areas, in which, since gasoline over the border costs much less, it is possible for distributors to sell fuel at lower costs than the internal areas of the country. In this case the aci tariff made the fuel refund at the standard cost when instead the employees bought it at a reduced rate, thus drawing an undue profit not subject to taxation.
)I think I've already told the asfinition that your personal costs are not related to the discussion, because I don't have to refund you but my dip, which uses a car with operating costs other than yours. you can also use a lamborghini, but my dip uses an old methane car, so I don't understand what your costs mean in my case (it is discussing precisely the fact that the aci rates are bovinmente rigid). In the specific case, you use the oil and the methane, are you saying that I have to repay the oil even when he uses the methane?then annual costs of my car, renault clio 1.5 dci, for a journey of 15000 km annual.
oil: 1070 EUR
stamp: 198.43 euro
insurance: 845 euro
Revision effect: 32.50 euro
cutting: 440 euro
summer tyre assembly: 20 euro
Summer tire incidence: 100 euro
Winter tire incidence: 180 euro
vehicle depreciation: 1700 euro
Total: 4585 euro
Kilometer cost: 4585/15000 = 0.305 euro
hunter, as you see it beats with the aci rates, and we talk about a utility (no suv or flagship) and are actual figures, not count of the maid.
Please note the following punctuations:
gas oil: actual consumption (me a sign), supplies always made at the lowest possible price of the area (white pepper)
insurance: 845 euros are those that pay today, after 10 years, but in the previous years when my malus bonus was greater and the car was worth more I arrived to pay also 1250 euros, figure less than 2000 euros of the aci, but well beyond the 200 euros proposed by hunter. Then you should add the kasco (which I do not have), to cover your own damage (the rc only covers damage to third parties).
cutting: cutting standard 250 euros, cutting with distribution 700 euros every 5 years, in calculating 440 euros I considered the average over 5 years adding 100 euros annual for possible extraordinary maintenance (last year I had to replace a valve in suction 100 euros and I had to make cutting with distribution + bronzine + pads + disks, total 1040 euros
depreciation of the vehicle: paid 17000 euros, planning to keep it 10 years
yes but the problem place is to understand whether the aci rates are reliable or not, if they are reliable then they should be also in your case.. .
So you think it's right to apply a generic table, which may not suit the specific case, rather than study the real situation and apply quota ratings.
or we rebalance the point of view, always useful to understand the point of view of our interlocutors: If the aci tariff would offer you a cost that you consider less than your real cost, would you accept it because it is the "aci table" or would you ask your employer for an integration?