• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

creation cylindrical surface cutting

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simone1666
  • Start date Start date
banda bassotti said:
with a strawberry può walk?
Click to expand...
You have not understood the meaning of my question.
I meant there was no 2d data to create it.
if it is for real realization you can also use a spherical braking to past 0.5mm, obviously with a cam.
However if the object to be reproduced in 3d is a school exercise.. Then whatever happens.
the important thing is that visually it is approximately equal to 2d.
if instead.. you have to build a 3d model and then build it really.. bhe.. in that case there are no quotas and those that are put to the cazzum.
There is no indication that the bevel at 45° the quotas 11 and 18 should be constant throughout their height.. or only in the a-a section.
visually.. Could be.. but is free interpretation
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vittorio said:
You have not understood the meaning of my question.
I meant there was no 2d data to create it.
If it is for real realization you can also use a 0.1mm past spherical braking with a cam.
However if the object to be reproduced in 3d is a school exercise.. Then whatever happens.
the important thing is that visually it is approximately equal to 2d.
if instead.. you have to build a 3d model and then build it really.. bhe.. in that case lacking quotas and those that are put to the cazzum
Click to expand...
I'm sure they're put to the cazzum, but they're made, you checked my step file?
 
There are quotas
11 and 18 45° = sm.3.5 for 45° on that section that using a 45° cutter (only a crowd would use the ball) from radius center draws me up and down exactly the profile you see, do not need other odds and there is no other sensible way to do it. If you use the solid sweep with the cutter profile at 45° a bit larger than 3.5 you will see that comes
 
banda bassotti said:
There are quotas
11 and 18 45° = sm.3.5 for 45° on that section using a mill at 45° (only a fool would use the ball) from center ray draws me up and down exactly the profile you see,you don't need other odds and there's no other way to make it.if you use the solid sweep with the cut profile at 45° a bit larger than 3.5 you'll see that it comes to you
Click to expand...
crazy even with a frieze for bevels with a tilted wall you do not know how much, go to eye?
on a cylinder shaped to about 2nd.. a third inclination comes out
 
Vittorio said:
You have not understood the meaning of my question.
I meant there was no 2d data to create it.
if it is for real realization you can also use a spherical braking to past 0.5mm, obviously with a cam.
However if the object to be reproduced in 3d is a school exercise.. Then whatever happens.
the important thing is that visually it is approximately equal to 2d.
if instead.. you have to build a 3d model and then build it really.. bhe.. in that case there are no quotas and those that are put to the cazzum.
There is no indication that the bevel at 45° the quotas 11 and 18 should be constant throughout their height.. or only in the a-a section.
visually.. Could be.. but is free interpretation
Click to expand...
the initial idea was to see the feasibility of the piece in 3d starting from the 2d, that is if it was possible to reconstruct it or it was necessary the original 3d because of the complexity of the design. then any work would have been taken into account later.
 
Simone1666 said:
the initial idea was to see the feasibility of the piece in 3d starting from the 2d, that is if it was possible to reconstruct it or it was necessary the original 3d because of the complexity of the design. then any work would have been taken into account later.
Click to expand...
All you want.
my initial consideration is that the 2d design is not clear at all to reproduce a 3d.
If we had to build that 3d model in more people... 3d identical models would not come out
 
Vittorio said:
Right. now, from trade, there are bevel tools at 14.42°
Let me understand, but what bevel did you mean to perform with the bevel tool? . 45° or 14.42°
Click to expand...
never thought of tilting the piece?
However tranqui also uses the spherical frieze and in luck to the wolf.
 
apart from you have not answered my question of 45° and 14.42°
The spherical frieze was an example to make you notice that piece can be performed with different strategies and the brilliant idea of the bevel tool. . could also be replaced with the execution in erosion.
You're not talking about costing the object less.. but modeling 3d
but your suggestion of the bevel tool was out of place because you did not understand my post #5 consideration.
 
I'll explain it to you in the press.
cylindrical radius 3 tilted to 14.42° with applied a 45° bevel to make it in reality
to do so in tred I would use a solid sweep to dig with the profile of the complete bevelous frieze with dicttreice a straight ranging from radius 3 below radius 3 higher.
before responding by party taken try to shape it I am not currently using solidworks.
 
Do I understand? a ø6 cutter with a 45° beveler embedded?
Put me an image of that tool because I've never seen it. Thank you in advance
 
Are you there?
If you don't want to use a beveler, use another cutter like the one from the photo already attached following the same path, are you there?
Did you try on 3d modeling?
 
Here. the ø6 cutter with built-in 45° beveler I missed.. So you made it up right now?
I don't have sw

I don't have to prove to you that I'm capable of doing that, if you ever show me
 
I think you have gaps in geometry. I'll point out that if you make a quarry, like drawing 2d in question, on a cylinder shaped to 2nd and on this quarry you want to make a bevel at 2x45° constant you have to change the zeta depth of the tool path because you generate a third inclination.
 
Vittorio said:
I think you have gaps in geometry. I'll point out that if you make a quarry, like drawing 2d in question, on a cylinder shaped to 2nd and on this quarry you want to make a bevel at 2x45° constant you have to change the zeta depth of the tool path because you generate a third inclination.
Click to expand...
Okay, bravo.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top