a good book for machine construction

[Fabius3D]

If really the exam mode is this I would say that the number of people who pass it is close to zero.

Honestly, I don't know what to say to you... I did the exam like this:
- two "body" exercises in 2 hours;
- compulsory oral of about 1.5 hours minimum for all votes from 15/30 onwards.

the science examination of the buildings instead was only oral and lasted 3.5 hours (they made you exercise a hyperstatic structure and then asked you theory).

zero is a good approximation!
But if others have passed it, I will do it one day! (I hope so!)
science of construction compared to this was a walk!
Thanks for the answer anyway! :finger:

 

[PierArg]

I think I'm lucky to have a "honest" professor.

I remember that he asked me how a two-end framed sheet was involved, subject to heat gradient and with crack passing in the center. while I was about to write a series of formulas that from deltat led me to the movements etc. etc. etc.... he ripped off the sheet and told me:
"I don't care about demonstrations, so in two hours you forgot the formulas!"
He wanted to know if I could guess where the tension would be formed, what state was and whether the defect was closed or opened.

 

[Fabius3D]

Well, I'd say I'd feel better about taking a test like that. :
Now I keep trying to understand! :

 

[stef_design]

Hi.
I used shigley even though everyone speaks very well of juvinall.

I've found myself pretty good, but if you already have juvinall, I'll shock you.

Why did you find yourself well enough with shigley? for what is enough.. .
seems to me very + recent of the young people who seem to be written with the typewriter
Hi.

 

[meccanicamg]

one of the almost best mechanical organ design books is shigley's mechanical engineering design - 9th edition. Unfortunately we continue to use almost useless books in universities, with old notions and examples and do not really need to design in the working environment.

for me it is "almost" because version 8 had only the American indications and therefore almost nothing in yes. version 9 has integrated practically everything also the you and you get to solution very quickly.

of better than this there are my manual artifacts

 

[stef_design]

one of the almost best mechanical organ design books is shigley's mechanical engineering design - 9th edition. Unfortunately we continue to use almost useless books in universities, with old notions and examples and do not really need to design in the working environment.

for me it is "almost" because version 8 had only the American indications and therefore almost nothing in yes. version 9 has integrated practically everything also the you and you get to solution very quickly.

of better than this there are my manual artifacts

hi, they translated it into Italian and it seems good.
What are you talking about?http://www.catalogo.mcgraw-hill.it/catlibro.asp?item_id=2941

ciao

 

[PierArg]

Hello, stef.

I wrote (caspita spent a year and a half :biggrin " Enough" because I don't remember being ill.
It's true that the young man seems written with the typewriter (I hate the graphics of that book) but he treats more topics.
for example elbow trees, biella, spinotti, etc., etc., etc. that on shigley are not treated.

one thing I appreciated (and here I go in contrast with the good mechanicsmg:wink are the examples... very useful to "glue" my excel sheets. :tongue:

towards the end of the shigley there is also an excellent case study of design of a two-stage reducer.

 

[TAURUS77]

Hello, everyone! !
during the university I used a little all the books I could find both the shigley and the juvinall-marshek and the excellent dispenses of prof petrucci (really a good professor and a good person) mentioned earlier, the johns is a great book but a little dated.
I still use shigley when memory abandons me and in fact I find it more practical and intuitive.

 

[TAURUS77]

I admit I've been lucky enough, because I think I've generally had good professors, I graduated from Ferrara. but if not so, what useful would he follow the courses?!? I also happened to myself that I had profes that when they explained there was no caxxo (just for the truth :smile, there the first thing to do to save time is not to go to lesson. I follow a course only if I consider it indispensable to learn first and to save time. if I had to follow a course where the prof to explain is a dog and I already take for granted that to pass the tests I dovo "lost" (it is done to say ) in a shigley, rather than in a john etc... I'm going home and I'm going to do my own thing on the show. up to 1/2 receptions to better refine your knowledge and hello. the "following" a course is (or at least should be) a big added value for students in terms of quality of training and time spent for preparation, not a simple formality, because they are paid for that. the quality of this service is measured in this way by the appreciation of students. to us at the end of each course they gave us an anonymous test to do, precisely to test the quality offered by the teaching, but not only!!! also to give an evaluation on classrooms, libraries, lesson times, exam mode, teacher availability for clarification requests, receptions etc. Guys, we're paying, we have to decide and assess how things have to go. The time of the baron university must end. if things continue to worsen with the decrease of resources at university and teaching where we will send our children to study?! in germany? in Switzerland?

Hello, my friend!
I agree with you though....my dog gets offended because when he has to make you understand something he does very well:tongue:
"the time of the baron university must end" I studied at the Unipe where barons do what they want and have children, grandchildren, lovers and various relatives settled at every level, said in poor words the most absolute gross.

 

[rogerpazz]

Hi, I did the exam a few years ago. what you need to know is fatigue, all theory as God commands and then you should have good basics of mechanical behavior of materials: hook law, stress, torsion, bending, etc... apart from herz that once understood it is very simple, all the rest are just formulas. the ideal is that you have well understood the exercises done to lesson, usually sn always the same, with some small variant how to find the tension or the maximum moment at a point. I used juvinall and shigley. For the oral you must have good notes of the course the prof will ask you those.

 

[sberna76]

niemann is the best.. .
Good luck
- - - updated - - - -niemann is the best.. .
Good luck

 

[PierArg]

... both the great dispenses of prof petrucci (really a good professor and a good person) ...

Once, looking on the internet for a topic on multiaxial fatigue, I appeared a dispensation of prof. g.petrucci - "machine construction lessons".
I must say that they are done very well and, as he writes, we understand that he has a deep knowledge and mastery of the subject.
I often consulted them and came back very useful.

I envy the students who could attend his lessons.