interesting, but if a tube loses?kids browsing the internet I came across this study concerning a new technology for the development of heating systems and cooling of buildings through this particular type of coat, which provides a series of serpentine to heat or cool the masonry from the outside.
how do you comment? :smile:
he he well this can happen in any type of irradiation plant at low temperature. . However, we admit to doing a good plant, it is actually much more shipped and cheaper work, but my perplexities are other, like the fact that the radiant source is beyond the barrier of existing walls. . .interesting, but if a tube loses?
but if you lose floor heating is not even worse?interesting, but if a tube loses?
That's what I thought. But at that point I would make a coat more often and take advantage of the laying system to create natural channels between wall and coat, where to flow air conditioning (hot or cold). At that point the costs would fall further.we say that the concept of low temperature plant is exact.
I knew for the first time plants of this type in 87, it was floor plants and they were already working very well.
as the water of the circuit was 45° (instead of the 70°-75° of a traditional plant) the saving was really remarkable.
let me puzzle the fact that you apply a plant on the outside, you have to cross the whole wall to convey the hot/fresh and you have only 6 cm of insulation outward .... Mah.
that you need to circulate a lot of air and you have to have a higher radiant surface, as it has a much lower thermal conductivity than water.That's what I thought. But at that point I would make a coat more often and take advantage of the laying system to create natural channels between wall and coat, where to flow air conditioning (hot or cold). At that point the costs would fall further.
Of course, air has less potential in transporting calories (or refrigerators) than water, and what does that mean in theory?
Why would it be expensive? (I still have to make a coat? )I am not convinced of this solution.(cut)
the plant costs a lot.(cut)
Sure. I would be interested to understand theoretically how much it costs extra to transport same calories with air and with water.. I mean, are there any concepts that have already been devised?that you need to circulate a lot of air and you have to have a higher radiant surface, as it has a much lower thermal conductivity than water.
I think it does not agree from the economic point of view (the air system instead of the water system).
the thermal conductivity of dry air is 0.026, that of distilled water is 0.6.Sure. I would be interested to understand theoretically how much it costs extra to transport same calories with air and with water.. I mean, are there any concepts that have already been devised?
interesting. then now (always remaining on the accounts of the servant) just understand how much it costs to move ventilating 23 liters of air and pumping instead 1 liter of water, right?the thermal conductivity of dry air is 0.026, that of distilled water is 0.6.
by making the bills serve 23 litres of air to have the thermal conductivity of a liter of water.
and above all what kind of boiler you have to use because it goes to air instead of to water:biggrin:, because if you use a heat pump, it is worth putting hot air directly into the environment.interesting. then now (always remaining on the accounts of the servant) just understand how much it costs to move ventilating 23 liters of air and pumping instead 1 liter of water, right?
However, in this way we create those air movements that would be desirable to reduce as much as possible, because they convey dust.and above all what kind of boiler you have to use because it goes to air instead of to water:biggrin:, because if you use a heat pump, it is worth putting hot air directly into the environment.
I have in the house a conditioning system with heat pumps and I have to tell you that when I use it (rarely) it is not bad.However, in this way we create those air movements that would be desirable to reduce as much as possible, because they convey dust.
then it would be much more difficult to create a closed circuit that always treats the same air. .
I also thought of using the wood to heat the air, and put the heat pump as an alternative or integro of energy.. the wood especially because I love to watch the fireI have in the house a conditioning system with heat pumps and I have to tell you that when I use it (rarely) it is not bad.
each machine has its dust filters, and when you turn on it heats it with an impressive speed, much better than traditional heating.
In fact I was thinking of installing a photovoltaic system to use as little as possible heating with wood and pellets (under this point of view I am equipped ... I have eliminated almost entirely fossil fuels).