advice on masses at the table

[torok]

we start from the beginning
I have a layout consisting of 2 assemblies one is called sleigh and a motorization.
I would like to see part of the plate on which the motorization group is fixed, but it is part of another set or slip this to understand how to mount it and to be able to also recall the screws that fix it (I'm putting it on the layout).
How are you doing?
import the view of the layout and trim it and hide what you don't need?

In this case we say it's quite simple but when I find myself having a more full layout, it seems a little long way.
I just want to know if this is the right way or there are other roads.

Thank you.

 

[re_solidworks]

I often have to insert carpentry "spezzoni" in the axioms that concern mechanics and motorization.
I do not always act in the same way, depends on situations and above all on the complexity of carpenters.
In principle, I create two configurations in the motorization axieme. in the first I hold active only the elements of the motorization to extrapolate the correct distinguishing with the pdm. in the second (the one I use for the table of the motorization) I put also the breaks of the carpenters interested in the fixings of the motorization, so that I can see a sensible assembly.
these carpentry breaks are often simple representative parts and not the actual assemblies. geometry is the same and it assures me the dependence on the same skeleton.
the screws do not put them in the layout, but in the motorization because they are elements to be used in this assembly. In the motorization aid, I will have, therefore, the various components including the screws.
Putting all the layout seems absurd, in my case I would certainly not be able for the complexity of the structures.

 

[torok]

"These carpentry breaks are often simple representative parts and not the actual assemblies. geometry is the same and it assures me the dependence on the same skeleton. "

I think you use the sw layout command, don't you?
I for now by layout I mean a set of axioms axiomed in a single set (take the turn of words)
the layout option I still have to understand it and as I said in other posts I know I absolutely have to do a course.

I miss how you put screws on the motorization if you don't see the plate that's attached to.

If someone was so kind to put an example of skeleton of a even banal layout, I'll study

 

[re_solidworks]

I do not use the layout functions, I have never deepened. I simply create two parallel axioms. in one there are only references like sketches, planes, surfaces that serve as reference to change the 3d.
I basically create the skeleton that I need to start a maximum study and to see that things are well together, then I create the various subaxis and the main axieme supporting me to the entities previously created.
In this way I can check an indefinite number of parts / assemblings simply by retouching a share of a sketch.
Unfortunately I do not have public examples, they are all part of projects and I cannot. I should create an ad hoc, but time is what it is and I can't promise you anything.

 

[LorenzoB]

I agree with re_solidworks.
I can only add that for us until 2008 the axieme that was "longed" for mounting issues, had three configurations, a "light from layout" and a "complete from distinct" and a "per table". in this way you could use the most suitable configuration depending on the case.
It is true that not all and not always did, because it takes time.
in 2009 we are testing (for now positive) with speedpak configuration, which seems to respond well to the need to create layouts.