aid for quota

[marcof]

Yes... a little late but I got there... I'm trying to figure out the offset in 3d...

If you want to join the offset to the body of the finished part in the toolbar "stampo" you have the command "face seat", choose "offset", select the surfaces to move, set measure and direction to move and is done.
If you want the bodies to remain separate you must first make an offset surface (toolbar surfaces) at zero distance. the faces of those surfaces use them to make a thickening (menu insert/extrusion-base/inspection) of the desired measure; If you remove the flag from "get results" the thickening will result you a body separated from the finished piece.

in 2d is a little simpler... :biggrin:

"no one is or ver, nu cred"... you try, and then let me know:tongue:

 

[valeria_emme]

I tried to put two supermetals of different dims on two faces... And then to collect, what do you say? is it right as a procedure? ? ?

 

[valeria_emme]

"no one is or ver, nu cred"... you try, and then let me know

:4406:wow... yes :biggrin::smile:... thanks marcof... you were gorgeous :3545:


I understood both ways to make overmetals. . fitting rays understood, withdrawal understood.. .
ulmino point... corners of reform... how do these surfaces prone? ?

 

[marcof]

I understood both ways to make overmetals. . fitting rays understood, withdrawal understood.. .
ulmino point... corners of reform... how do these surfaces prone? ?

command "form" then give you a read to the help. I have used it three times on the cross.
If you want to make the mold split on the top for the cylinder axis, I think you'd better work with only half of your piece. make all overmetals, disforms and fittings then mirrors on the floor and you have your complete rough again.
But I repeat, you have to explain well by those who deal with this type of design the succession of features to be applied otherwise you fall into love. the fittings for example I am sure that you should do them for last, after the reforms

Oh, but where did all the moldists get locked up? outdoor exits:bekle: Before I really do damage and to get out of the sand the valeria model needs dynamite!

 

[valeria_emme]

If you want to make the mold split on the top for the cylinder axis, I think you'd better work with only half of your piece. make all overmetals, disforms and fittings then mirrors on the floor and you have your complete rough again.

remake the piece??? do it again from the beginning??? :36_1_4:

cmq according to my text (so that shiren will have to be laughed)

norm or not norm theory or not theory in quodidian you will find only this
type of drawing
and I assure you it's the only international language
for rosica models and equipment for foundry
if you find a different norm in the exam you can contest it
Thank you1000:smile:

... the sequence is: overmetalli-choice of the split plan-ringing-angles of sform-ritiro in solid phase...:smile:

 

[valeria_emme]

command "form" then give you a read to the help.

I have to understand it's history of yellow and red green... I come out colored faces... ... tomorrow I will study this function... (and then maybe I'll go to the cam)

 

[marcof]

remake the piece??? do it again from the beginning??? :36_1_4:

but no! select the right plan and use it to cut off one of the two half!

cmq according to my text (I know that shiren will have to be redesigned)... the sequence is: overmetalli-choice of the plan of division-ringing-angles of sform-ritiro in solid phase...:smile:

attention, I was referring to the sequence of operations because the cad manages the model to the best. If you do the fittings before the cracks, you may not be able to crack the faces.

 

[valeria_emme]

If you want to make the mold split on the top for the cylinder axis, I think you'd better work with only half of your piece.

It was actually my first idea... But then I thought that I could make the bracket division plane coincide with the front wall, to drain everything into a single bracket... so I also facilitate the straightness that I do it open, and I have no positioning problems... But I asked for an opinion in the section "industrial press", but I did not receive news... so I returned to my first choice... + difficult, but surely good

 

[SHIREN]

remake the piece??? do it again from the beginning??? :36_1_4:

cmq according to my text (I know that shiren will have to be recried)... the sequence is: overmetalli-choice of the plan of division-ringing-angles of sform-ritiro in solid phase...:smile:

Hello valeria
Let us summarize

1. finished piece of 3d
2. table in 2 d
3. study of feasibility according to the sketch already posted
4. http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=19598
5. decide the plan of sez
6. in three d
7. put sforms in bleu
8. put overmetals in red
9. add withdrawal (moltiplichi x 1.018%)
10. When you're finished, let's go to plating

Good weekend

 

[SHIREN]

command "form" then give you a read to the help. I will

Oh, but where did all the moldists get locked up? Get out of the open before I really do damage and to get out of the sand the valeria model needs dynamite!

Hello Marco
we are here no prob:smile:
and less bad than toy
What if it was a centrifugal pump????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
to pull out the model from the bracket does not need dynamite
but must be provided for the graft in the mid-range of the model
of threaded inserts that by means of gulls allow the excretion
ehhhhh oh true that I do not love the three d:smile:
but do not use the sform command:
the sforms must draw them and extruder them
a hug

 

[Ste_d]

little curiosity... What text are you following?! I am also working on a fusion project for the university and the phases for fusion are: choice of the division plan (if you don't start with this you don't go anywhere because you have to delete the subsquadri), overmetal them only on the surfaces to work on the machine tools, retreat, corners of sform, fittings... I did so at least!

ps: if you want to make an explanatory design of my finished model with the soprametals in evidence just that I extrude and do not join the result?! i.e. going to do a section in 2d I get a different sampling or anyway I see the thickness of the soprametal compared to the finished piece? if you would be very interesting!

pps: I tried and you are right, you are mythical I didn't know!!! !

 

[valeria_emme]

little curiosity... What text are you following? !

follow Jesus Christ, mechanical technology and manufacturing studies, ed.ambrosiana... that you bugini-pacagnella-giardini-restelli, mechanical technology (vol 1 and 2). .
the first is more theoretical and complete... the second a little more practical and schematic. . .
integrated are perfect... only sin that are a little dated and I do not find myself with the regulations that change continuously... but in the network are found. .

What about you? ?

 

[Ste_d]

I imagined! prof. marco santochi is my professor of mechanical technology at the university of pisa :biggrin:
explains very well and also his book I find it very useful for how it is done... Maybe it should be updated but frankly for the theory is perfect! the info you need are simply on the network or on forums of the subjects like this:finger:

I attach a file I found on the net, it's like a summary of the steps you have to do:smile:

 

[valeria_emme]

I imagined! prof. marco santochi is my professor of mechanical technology at the university of pisa :biggrin:

wow:biggrin:

I attach a file I found on the net, it's like a summary of the steps you have to do:smile:

No, they are pages of an exercise of the second text that I recommended. . .

 

[Ste_d]

perfect ah! Then you know everything!

 

[SHIREN]

I imagined! prof. marco santochi is my professor of mechanical technology at the university of pisa :biggrin:
explains very well and also his book I find it very useful for how it is done... Maybe it should be updated but frankly for the theory is perfect! the info you need are simply on the network or on forums of the subjects like this:finger:

I attach a file I found on the net, it's like a summary of the steps you have to do:smile:

the file attached vabene for cast irons
for steels, this is a more complex moment
the weight spec is wrong
7.2

 

[valeria_emme]

Hey, here I am. I've worked a little (with a break x illness) and now I think I've reached my goal... I have followed all your advice to escusion of the thicknesses of the overmetals and the rays of connection, because unfortunately I have to stick to the "tabelle"... patience if practically not done so, but x my examination I must prove to be able to choose the values according to parameters fixed in tables and not according to the experience (which I do not have)...
I attach everything because I would like to have your opinion. . .
only problem... I can't quote the whole table (I can't put the thicknesses of the supermetals and some fittings)
for the rest should be veare bene :smile:

 

[sampom]

Hey, here I am. I've worked a little (with a break x illness) and now I think I've reached my goal... I have followed all your advice to escusion of the thicknesses of the overmetals and the rays of connection, because unfortunately I have to stick to the "tabelle"... patience if practically not done so, but x my examination I must prove to be able to choose the values according to parameters fixed in tables and not according to the experience (which I do not have)...
I attach everything because I would like to have your opinion. . .
only problem... I can't quote the whole table (I can't put the thicknesses of the supermetals and some fittings
for the rest should be veare bene :smile:

That's good. .
We were worried:

Listen,
since now the topic aid for quota He's broken and finished, so what do you say about this? "casting" Shall we open a new discussion?
we risk making a soup of o.t.

Maybe you open it with an appropriate title, then I see if I can throw in the messages on the topic already here.

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[geppetto]

the first 2 sketches are visible, the others are hidden.
left button on the sketch hide/show (the glasses). :finger:

 

[geppetto]

Sorry:redface: My answer referred to a question on page 11. I had not seen that there were other pages yet and that therefore the question had been exceeded.:redface: