Focus
Guest
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prt1jod7bjohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyrjp_ctv08These are a couple of videos where the st is shown, then if you want on youtube there are others.
Hi.
Hi.
warburg
Guest
...very fun! exists for the architectural cad or would be redundant, useless?
Hi.
C
Hi.
C
cacciatorino
Guest
But you don't have gugol schecciap yet? We're there big way
warburg
Guest
"bastardo" do not shoot on the red cross of modeling 3d...
do not shoot on the red cross of modeling 3d...michele81
Guest
ok I understood the philosophy...but is it a software apart or is included in solid edge?
only that gives me the impression that controlling the individual parts within a complex set involves putting several rules, perhaps you do first with the classic method or wrong?
only that gives me the impression that controlling the individual parts within a complex set involves putting several rules, perhaps you do first with the classic method or wrong?
cacciatorino
Guest
is included in solid edge starting from the st version (follow st2, st3, etc), which would be the one immediately after v20.
The st has been out of a few months in Europe, it should be coming to st2 soon.
marcof
Guest
for me remains a mystery the reason why in the architectural field the 3d is so unused and, it seems to me to read around, unusable. apart from the capillary diffusion of that brontosaur of acad, how come the cad 3d dedicated to the architettua are so rigid, not widespread and above all have come out thirty years after the mechanical ones without seemingly having copied the best of the potential? that gary (just to mention the most famous that will wave the use of 3d for a few years) must have used caia to design its forms to me seems simply ridiculous."bastardo"
It is right for a purely academic discussion, which you have already dealt with elsewhere; in the case "scancellate" my post:smile:
Hi.
warburg
Guest
I think we go...
I couldn't answer you about the causes of this, I never thought about it until a few months ago, when I started thinking about buying a bim or a modeler or something different from acad... Perhaps in answer to your question there would be an explanation of the fact that I remain "open mouth" by looking at the modeling tutorials of mechanical cads
I would like an architectural bim with the fantastic 3d capabilities of a mechanical cad, and in fact I was and I am intrigued by the possible relationships, inside vectorworks designer, between the architect module and that mechanical design...
Hi.
C
I couldn't answer you about the causes of this, I never thought about it until a few months ago, when I started thinking about buying a bim or a modeler or something different from acad... Perhaps in answer to your question there would be an explanation of the fact that I remain "open mouth" by looking at the modeling tutorials of mechanical cads
I would like an architectural bim with the fantastic 3d capabilities of a mechanical cad, and in fact I was and I am intrigued by the possible relationships, inside vectorworks designer, between the architect module and that mechanical design...
Hi.
C
Focus
Guest
certainly redundant and with many useless functions, but a colleague of mine designed the renovation of the house, "architectural" fireplace included.
Hi.
vespa_83
Guest
I also propose a survey, and I open a new topic
pienne
Guest
Okay. I have to break a spear in favor of st.
If you try to work in this environment spoiled by the parametric discourse you can only find yourself wrong, you need to understand the philosophy of thest, that is, the quotas and constraints on the model do not exist but are defined at the time when you make the change. clearly this way of working has advantages and disadvantages....but also the parametric way, who never "triped" when he goes to make a change on the first feature of a piece that contains different?
on the st2 the interface has been slightly improved, but ahimè it is necessary to forget the old interface if... Among other things all other programs are going in that direction forced by microsoft.
If you try to work in this environment spoiled by the parametric discourse you can only find yourself wrong, you need to understand the philosophy of thest, that is, the quotas and constraints on the model do not exist but are defined at the time when you make the change. clearly this way of working has advantages and disadvantages....but also the parametric way, who never "triped" when he goes to make a change on the first feature of a piece that contains different?
on the st2 the interface has been slightly improved, but ahimè it is necessary to forget the old interface if... Among other things all other programs are going in that direction forced by microsoft.
maxopus
Guest
my program is different, it has the proprietary interface and it hangs with microzozz :biggrin: