WoolyHooly
Guest
Hello, everyone. .
I'm pressing that I'm at first with catechism and I have a little problem with my first fem analysis.
I'll explain briefly. .
I simulated a plate of diameter to which it is calettato on a tree with diamond also it to..
the shaft has its rotation around the axis z and the plate is bound as if it were bolted to the tree.. So if the tree turns the pot also turns (always around z). .
2 questions
1) as constraint the plate to the tree (not in assembly environment) but in analysis environment? I used the contact constraint by selecting as reference the surface contact constraint I had created in assembly environment and then obviously reported in analysis...(right? )
2) if I now impose rotation. ..coppia.. tells me to choose the reference (and I chose the tree) and then obviously the axis of rotation. ......
This is now the problem..nn makes me select in no way the axis of rotation ....logically around z... and also there is a constraint of coincidence deriving from the assembly environment...so I thought you had found it immediately but instead.......... .
Please help me!
I'm pressing that I'm at first with catechism and I have a little problem with my first fem analysis.
I'll explain briefly. .
I simulated a plate of diameter to which it is calettato on a tree with diamond also it to..
the shaft has its rotation around the axis z and the plate is bound as if it were bolted to the tree.. So if the tree turns the pot also turns (always around z). .
2 questions
1) as constraint the plate to the tree (not in assembly environment) but in analysis environment? I used the contact constraint by selecting as reference the surface contact constraint I had created in assembly environment and then obviously reported in analysis...(right? )
2) if I now impose rotation. ..coppia.. tells me to choose the reference (and I chose the tree) and then obviously the axis of rotation. ......
This is now the problem..nn makes me select in no way the axis of rotation ....logically around z... and also there is a constraint of coincidence deriving from the assembly environment...so I thought you had found it immediately but instead.......... .
Please help me!