arrotondamento quote

[Davimont]

when I say something with rounding without decimals, it happens that the total sum does not correspond for 1mm.
in the image on the left all quotas without decimals and on the right the two quotas in series with 1 decimal to make understand the situation.

can you do so that the total corresponds to the total of the two quotas without force it manually?

 

[Be_on_edge]

when I say something with rounding without decimals, it happens that the total sum does not correspond for 1mm.
in the image on the left all quotas without decimals and on the right the two quotas in series with 1 decimal to make understand the situation.

can you do so that the total corresponds to the total of the two quotas without force it manually?

in the properties of the quota, on the rounding you must go to insert all the values instead of values equal

 

[Marco F inox]

Of course you can, fixing as main the lower or higher line, as the project says.
from this line, quoted zero, leave all quotas until you reach all points.
It's called progressive quotation.

 

[Davimont]

in the properties of the quota, on the rounding you must go to insert all the values instead of values equal

I already default "all values" if that's what you mean.

Of course you can, fixing as main the lower or higher line, as the project says.
from this line, quoted zero, leave all quotas until you reach all points.
It's called progressive quotation.

Thanks marco but that's not what I was asking. if known, in the first image I have 2 odds that sum you do not give the correct value, 4140+902 gives me as total 5043 while it would be 5042, this is given by the rounded decimals.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

beyond the visual aspect and inconsistency one of the three quotas should be placed in brackets because derived from the other two; this would evade the doubts of the builder who would understand that there is a rounding

 

[Be_on_edge]

I already default "all values" if that's what you mean.View attachment 69271Thanks marco but that's not what I was asking. if known, in the first image I have 2 odds that sum you do not give the correct value, 4140+902 gives me as total 5043 while it would be 5042, this is given by the rounded decimals.

Yes, I'm sorry, I've responded heartfeltly. This is not for your "problem."

in these situations it is best to put only the important quotas and possibly to show in parentheses the extra quota. if then there are tolerances to respect better show the decimals depending on the accuracy you want to get.

 

[Davimont]

beyond the visual aspect and inconsistency one of the three quotas should be placed in brackets because derived from the other two; this would evade the doubts of the builder who would understand that there is a rounding

Yes, I'm sorry, I've responded heartfeltly. This is not for your "problem."

in these situations it is best to put only the important quotas and possibly to show in parentheses the extra quota. if then there are tolerances to respect better show the decimals depending on the accuracy you want to get.

you are right but you are at a higher level!!! :roflmao:
:roflmao::roflmao:

I press that they are not technical drawings, like the scarabocchi on the cardboard to make cut a piece of iron with the big flexible!

the other problem is that I have to pass them to a person in production of other times, who still has doubts about the quotas between millimeters and centimeters! . If I put a quote in brackets, it could be a tachycardia and I could have it on my conscience!

I hope I've made the idea of my situation.

beyond the jokes, I was wondering if there was a setting to solve the problem (other than the quota in parentheses). the purpose is to cut off the fabric where obviously the tenth of mm is not required but in drawing it to cad inevitably come out of decimals.

 

[cacciatorino]

you are right but you are at a higher level!!! :roflmao:
:roflmao::roflmao:

I press that they are not technical drawings, like the scarabocchi on the cardboard to make cut a piece of iron with the big flexible!

the other problem is that I have to pass them to a person in production of other times, who still has doubts about the quotas between millimeters and centimeters! . If I put a quote in brackets, it could be a tachycardia and I could have it on my conscience!

I hope I've made the idea of my situation.

beyond the jokes, I was wondering if there was a setting to solve the problem (other than the quota in parentheses). the purpose is to cut off the fabric where obviously the tenth of mm is not required but in drawing it to cad inevitably come out of decimals.

I would cancel one of the two odds whose sum does not make the total.... .

 

[radio]

....

beyond the jokes, I was wondering if there was a setting to solve the problem (other than the quota in brackets)....

There is no way, 5+5=11 (5.4+5.4=10.8), it is correct so, with other programs (e.g. excel) you can ignore the decimal part and keep only the whole but make "regionare" so a cad would only be "dangerous".
The only way you have to solve is to correct the templates so you don't have decimals.

 

[Davimont]

change the shape would add useless work for the purpose of the design, at the end I climb the quota and I put 1 second, so much the design is born and dies in the shop, there is no risk of reuse it with the risk of having a quota that is not updated.
Even the hunter solution is valid but as I explained before, then the colleague does not see one and crashes!

thanks to all