bending with loft: final point reference.

[graziano-g]

hi, the latest versions, sw, made it smarter, or less stupid.... .
now if we want to make a hopper or half hopper the operation is considerably easier than in the past.
applying or not applying the strategy final point reference you get two different results, as it is right.
But now someone is able to explain why the flat repetition of solid ( prt ) and the relative untouching of flat repetition (drw ) do not have substantial differences apart from a slight difference in the corners of fold ??
n.b. even inventor behaves the same way, ozzac....
or is there any parameter to set??
Thank you.
p.s.
I also asked for a sw luminaire, see what he answers or who answers first.

 

[biz]

what is meant by "...no substantial differences..."? more specific. What's the problem?

 

[graziano-g]

Hello, do you see differences between flat repetitions? same area / shape, no unloading though this is visible in the folded... What's the problem? The stem does not reflect the folded, the images are simply clear as well as the description, I have nothing more to add than specific.... good Sunday to all .

 

[biz]

development is correct. the drain can be added manually as from image.

 

[graziano-g]

I did not write that development is not correct.
change the geometry manually ( insert the drain ) as well as overwrite the odds is as much more wrong you can do, you lose the reference when from a solid you get another one with new code. sw and inv do not come out with the correct development, by shame.

 

[biz]

You didn't write much about it. I can't give you a targeted answer. be more punctual in your requests. avoid complaints gently (or opinions out of place). this is a place of sharing knowledge. At least it should be.

 

[graziano-g]

given the initial descriptive simplicity is my opinion that it is not worth continuing to not impact your sensitivity. Sorry.

 

[Steppermotor]

without a discharge on the summit I would say that it becomes almost impossible to build, at least with the technology I know.. .

 

[graziano-g]

Hello, and there we are.... the thing that does not find explanations is because graphically the fold presents the discharge that disappears in the stem.... the same question put also to Mr umberto flotti who could only find the result without knowing how to explain the reason... .