• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

blend

  • Thread starter Thread starter supertramp
  • Start date Start date

supertramp

Guest
Can you tell me what kind of command you make a connection like this? seems constant despite the tilted plane. I would like to understand if it is feasible with my mach1 license (without using the variable radius)
 

Attachments

  • raccordo.webp
    raccordo.webp
    64.1 KB · Views: 44
Can you tell me what kind of command you make a connection like this? seems constant despite the tilted plane. I would like to understand if it is feasible with my mach1 license (without using the variable radius)
You can use a soft blend by building the edge curves you want.
 
You can use a soft blend by building the edge curves you want.
Hello drink, thanks for the interest. I don't think it's a soft blend because the whole piece is connected in this way and I doubt they took so much time for the fittings. I think there's a command he's been doing for himself. I'm curious to know what it is to understand what license I should have to do. However with the mach1 I can not even use the soft blend:frown:
 
Can you tell me what kind of command you make a connection like this? seems constant despite the tilted plane. I would like to understand if it is feasible with my mach1 license (without using the variable radius)
which cad comes from?
Can you just attach a piece of this part?
 
in the attached file I made a fast construction with 5 radius solutions (premium that I did not deliberately put the soft blend because already proposed) and then I inserted 2 commands (styled blend and aesthetic face blend) that with mach 1 you do not have but in the meantime you can taste them....hihhihihihihihihihihi:tongue:
 

Attachments

in the attached file I made a fast construction with 5 radius solutions (premium that I did not deliberately put the soft blend because already proposed) and then I inserted 2 commands (styled blend and aesthetic face blend) that with mach 1 you do not have but in the meantime you can taste them....hihhihihihihihihihihi:tongue:
the only one approaching is aesthetic face blend, but you have to change the option from 'rolling ball' to 'spine'.
 
the only one approaching is aesthetic face blend, but you have to change the option from 'rolling ball' to 'spine'.
was just an example of automatic function that unfortunately he cannot use because he must have at least one mach3
 
what you ask you get with the aesthetic face blend command that in your license not contemplated.
I suggest you make an improvement request as this type of radius is present in catia and solidworks without special licenses.
 
I don't have time to try... but what's the problem with making that connection with the hedge blend?
 
thanks to all, cmq it is believed that they used the aestetic blend. question, can you buy a command? probably not but it would not be bad to be able to customize the license more flexiblely.
 
thanks to all, cmq it is believed that they used the aestetic blend. question, can you buy a command? probably not but it would not be bad to be able to customize the license more flexiblely.
a command no but a package yes type shape studio, at least a time ago it was so. but it cost an exaggeration, it had to explode the license and buy the single 'flottanti' packages.
Hi.
 
I had a moment of time today.. .
the best method is to use face blend (which I think is included in all machs) with edge curves.
the edge curves are easily obtained with a tube and intersection with the solid.
... just one...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top