bombardier

[RS4]

first flight c-series cs100 on September 16, 2013 also this plane and made in italy design and development:wink:

competitor of boeing 737 and airbus a320[video=youtube;byMIlLKJjFI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bymillkjjfi[/video]
http://cseries.com/category/first-flight/
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/bombardier_cseries
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/bombardier_cseries
http://cseries.com/good reading

 

[Er Presidente]

first flight c-series cs100 on September 16, 2013 also this plane and made in italy design and development:wink:


good reading

I do not understand that the project and development are Italian, but it turns out that some internal parts and flight controls have been developed by Italian companies.

 

[RS4]

I do not understand that the project and development are Italian, but it turns out that some internal parts and flight controls have been developed by Italian companies.

hi as the 787 also this aircraft for some parts of flight was designed and developed in Italy with Italian patents, perhaps it is mentioned less because less famous than the 787 completely in composite
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/impresa-e-territori/2013-09-17/cs100-bombardier-grande-contributo-153645.shtml?uuid=ab42nlxication

rs4

 

[paulpaul]

competitor of boeing 737 and airbus a320

I think it is more a substitute for crj bombers and a competitor of embraers erj170/175 and erj190/195.. Although it seems to me that lately the market for regional jets has been somewhat faded to the advantage of just above-end aircraft (families 737 and 320). So much so that the cseries seems a little short of orders, and that embraer is also slowing down. . .

 

[cacciatorino]

I think it is more a substitute for crj bombers and a competitor of embraers erj170/175 and erj190/195.. Although it seems to me that lately the market for regional jets has been somewhat faded to the advantage of just above-end aircraft (families 737 and 320). So much so that the cseries seems a little short of orders, and that embraer is also slowing down. . .

Perhaps that also depends on the idea of standardizing the fleet on a single aircraft, and thinking whether that manufacturer will be able to guarantee long-term assistance (will there still be embraer and bomber in ten years? boh?).

 

[RS4]

I think it is more a substitute for crj bombers and a competitor of embraers erj170/175 and erj190/195.. Although it seems to me that lately the market for regional jets has been somewhat faded to the advantage of just above-end aircraft (families 737 and 320). So much so that the cseries seems a little short of orders, and that embraer is also slowing down. . .

should be direct competitor of boeing and airbus ..., and a narrow-body aircraft to tight fuselage

read: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/aereo_a_fusoliera_strettaIt is not true that the regional authorities are slowing down


see atr42/72 sukkoi superjet100 bombier same with the series in object both the 100 and the 300 elongated

Perhaps that also depends on the idea of standardizing the fleet on a single aircraft, and thinking whether that manufacturer will be able to guarantee long-term assistance (will there still be embraer and bomber in ten years? boh?).

I don't think they'll fail. bombier and a colossus but less about boeing and airbus

 

[paulpaul]

I'm sure they're always narrow leotards like 737 and 320, but I was talking about regional, which is a subset of narrow leotards (even the concord and 707 if we want were narrow leotards, but not of course regional): a short/half-haul plane with a max capacity of around 100 places is defined as regional, which should be characterized by management costs lower than just above 737 and 320. the long version, cs300, actually a little 'debort' from the regional category.
the 737 in the version -900 and the 321 still have capacity well superior.
Compared to regional semmai is 318, which has had little commercial success, and 737-600, also not sold in many specimens and is no longer produced. It's clear that some overlap can be.

it does not seem to me that the cs, however beautiful plane, sales brillies: We are talking about a big order of air canada coming, I hope so, but the situation orders does not seem to me rose (about 180 to today).

that there are so many competitors does not mean that there is the market for all, and I spoke of the latter: also the superjet100 sells (not much) almost only in ex-urss countries.
the atrs are not jets, and as its competitor dhc8-q400 lives of alternate fortunes, depending on the cost of fuel.
I just want to point out that, even in the turboprop field, years ago were widespread aircraft of the class of 30 places (dhc8-100, do328, saab340, etc.) that are no longer considered economically profitable. also the same atr42 was over time encroached in orders from the most capacious 72.

It seems to me that the current trend of the companies "major" is to uniform the fleets and use rather capacious planes to break down the management costs linked to many families of different planes and to have lower costs/passenger.

if you talk here
http://www.oliverwyman.de/deu-insights/motl-crisisregionalaviation.pdf