confutatis
Guest
Little incorrect courier to my previous post.
in the design examined the angle ang2 was more and more than ang1, but it was enough to rotate the two entities and presented me ang2 less than ang1. the attached lisp further extends the condition on the corners and now are included also the angles -90° and -270° not previously contemplated.
in the design examined the angle ang2 was more and more than ang1, but it was enough to rotate the two entities and presented me ang2 less than ang1. the attached lisp further extends the condition on the corners and now are included also the angles -90° and -270° not previously contemplated.