calculation of axial weights

[radio]

I am struggling with another problem (today it is such a day, that you want to do it) that I cannot solve.
imagine a structure of asses to b c where to is father of b that is father of c.
Suppose you do not want to consider the weight of c, just put no in properties occurrence --> physical properties.
I happen that if I open b and calculate the weight, rightly it is ignored c; but if I open to and calculate the weight (even only b) that c is included!
is it normal?
Is there something I miss?
is the spring ahead?

Hello, everyone.

 

[a.belloni]

What version do you use? ?
I was told that with the st version the kiss was solved.

 

[cacciatorino]

I happen that if I open b and calculate the weight, rightly it is ignored c; but if I open to and calculate the weight (even only b) that c is included!


Hello, everyone.

Everything works well here, both opening b and weight is always zero, whereas c is different from zero. attached together v18.

 

[radio]

thanks for the answers.

What version do you use? ?
I was told that with the st version the kiss was solved.

ho la 18.

Everything works well here, both opening b and weight is always zero, whereas c is different from zero. attached together v18.

It is true, however, if from the edgebar select a.asm, b.asm or c.asm the weight of c.asm is calculated!
In fact, my problem is that from a rather complex set I want to be able to select only a few subaximes, which in turn contain other subaximes, some of them excluded from the calculation of physical properties, but which are also calculated.
Friday I tried to find a solution to the problem by doing a lot of tests and I developed a procedure that I bring back below; it is not yet definitive, with the same together sometimes it works and sometimes not and I do not understand why (I suspect it is because of parts that do not yet have their own weight "saved" in the file, but I have to check well)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

attention!!! read the following instructions carefully:

In case you interrupt a group with subaxis children or grandchildren indicated as not to include in the calculation of physical properties, the program assumes behaviors that can lead in error.

Case 1. it is supposed to load the axieme to which it contains the axieme b which in turn contains the subaxieme c which should not be included in the calculation of the weight; if you launch the “physical property” command without selecting anything the calculation will be correct and the weight of c will not be considered; if instead in the edgebar you select to and launch the command “physical property” in this case will be calculated the total weight includendo c even if in the tab “property occurrence” has been imposed not to do so.
conclusion: in the case of calculation of the weight of a whole together you should not select from the edgebar.

Case 2. you suppose now to load the axieme to previous but to want to calculate the weight of b, in this case you will need to select it but so doing will be calculated also the weight of c, what you want to avoid.
it is possible, however, to act like this: to hide with hide everything c e da tools-->configuration Select download hidden parts, at this point it will be possible to select b and calculate the weight without counting c.to check. in some cases it worked, in others not


ciao a tutti.

 

[radio]

I am forced to correct what has been said before, there is no "case 2"; the procedure for correct weight calculation is the definition as follows:

In case you interrupt a group with subaxis children or grandchildren indicated as not to include in the calculation of physical properties, the program assumes behaviors that can lead in error.

it is supposed to load the axieme to which it contains the axieme b which in turn contains the subaxieme c which should not be included in the calculation of the weight; if you launch the “physical property” command without selecting anything the calculation will be correct and the weight of c will not be considered; if instead in the edgebar you select to and launch the command “physical property” in this case will be calculated the total weight including c even if in the tab “property occurrence” has been imposed not to do so.conclusion: to obtain a reliable value from the calculation of the weight of a set, the latter must be loaded alone and no selection should be made.

 

[a.belloni]

Should someone explain to us why there is the check in the properties of the need for weight calculation if after doing what he wants? ?

 

[radio]

I would like to know if it is a kiss of 18, then set up in later releases, or if it is a characteristic behavior and perhaps wanted by the omini zimenz.

 

[a.belloni]

I found it in version 19 but it already existed since 14 I was told that in the st was resolved, I unfortunately have some doubt.