cam curve analysis

[simra]

boys place an image in which you see a flat cam whose surface was created through a series of points extracted from a tabulate.
I have to realize a design review of a machine with different cams of which I have a rather approximate paper design and a tabulate always printed of points.
the surface of the first cam that I have realized is like an enclosed image. I would like to point out that I am not an expert on curve analysis but at first glance the surface does not seem to me a great deal, especially for the lack of continuity in curvature that turns into acceleration/decelletion. Who can tell me about +?
Perhaps a few tips on the bending analysis tool because I have seen that there are considerable differences in increasing or decreasing accuracy of the analysis.
Thank you.

 

[SweptBlend]

from what I can understand, but the prioblema is not of the curvature analysis, but of the curve itself,
creating a curve for points, if the points are many,
the curve that is created tends to pass by "all " points,
creating a step-down climb that is highlighted by the curvature analysis.

you should "lisciate" the curve, eliminating excess points, maintaining initial and final tangency, and "logic" of your cam.

 

[simra]

from what I can understand, but the prioblema is not of the curvature analysis, but of the curve itself,
creating a curve for points, if the points are many,
the curve that is created tends to pass by "all " points,
creating a step-down climb that is highlighted by the curvature analysis.

you should "lisciate" the curve, eliminating excess points, maintaining initial and final tangency, and "logic" of your cam.

thanks swept! I actually had reasoned in that sense.
I believe that the tabulate I have is a "relief" of the cam profile every 0.5°.
Now I have to try to reason on the "supports" maybe forgetting some points and rebuild a curve with less change of direction.