can this component be printed?

[ET3D]

Good morning to all,

Attached I put a component that I would like to print by injection, I would like to understand the actual technical feasibility, my idea would be to have a simple mold (open and close) without need to use movements.
This would be a non-definite draft, the thickness of the material is 2.5 mm, can anyone fail me on the feasibility of this component?
Thank you very much

Good work to everyone!

 

[Vittorio]

if you train a step is better
at first glance I see it hard with an open and close, but with small changes you could

 

[TECNOMODEL]

Good morning to all,

Attached I put a component that I would like to print by injection, I would like to understand the actual technical feasibility, my idea would be to have a simple mold (open and close) without need to use movements.
This would be a non-definite draft, the thickness of the material is 2.5 mm, can anyone fail me on the feasibility of this component?
Thank you very much

Good work to everyone!

without movements with those openings is not such an obvious thing, but without having the solid underhand it is difficult to give an opinion.

 

[ET3D]

Hello victorious!

thank you so much for your answer in the meantime, wanting I can attach the step, but being a right draft to understand the actual feasibility of molding I did not perform the various rite sforms and the ray is made entirely random, if you tell me that it can come back useful also in these conditions I attach it more than willingly!

Thank you!

if you train a step is better
at first glance I see it hard with an open and close, but with small changes you could

 

[Vittorio]

if you tell me that it can be useful even in these conditions I attach it more than willingly

allega lo step

 

[ET3D]

allega lo step

Here you go.
do not be afraid too much that I realize many things are aberrant in this piece ahahahahah
Thank you very much anyway!

 

[TECNOMODEL]

Here you go.
do not be afraid too much that I realize many things are aberrant in this piece ahahahahah
Thank you very much anyway!

I think we need some trolleys, and we still need geometry.
the nerva cannot have the same thickness of the piece, otherwise it creates an obvious retreat on the opposite face.
thinking of opening the mold axially with the openings would require important reforms, perhaps even a third plate to be sure to extract the part in fixed.
the rays on the openings complicate not little by forcing to divide the soul and creating points of possible gag. much depends also on the required precision and aesthetics you want to achieve.
this from a very quick first examination.

 

[Vittorio]

apart from the processing and other considerations.
without modifications an open and close is not possible
If you can make a change like that.. an open and close and feasible
then you have to do an analysis on where to inject it

 

[TECNOMODEL]

apart from the cracks. . .
without modifications an open and close is not possible
If you can make a change like that.. an open and close and feasible
then you have to do an analysis on where to inject itView attachment 69715View attachment 69716

the opening area should however be modified, those rays cannot be realized, especially in a mold without trolleys.
However, it remains a 30 mm deep footprint for a thickness of less than 3 mm, extracting the fixed part can be problematic.

 

[Vittorio]

a, you can't make those rays, I know

it in fact has specified that the rays were randomly and I also believe to changeable. . I think
in any case other than the subsquadra solved with my proposal. .
then it should be analyzed well on sform thicknesses etc. etc.

 

[ET3D]

it in fact has specified that the rays were randomly and I also believe to changeable. . I think
in any case other than the subsquadra solved with my proposal. .
then it should be analyzed well on sform thicknesses etc. etc.

exactly, they are put at home the rays and are absolutely changeable.
the solution you propose I like and is absolutely viable, I can safely make that change to the piece.
then of course I also feel the moulder directly to ask him how it is more convenient to print it.
what I wanted to know was whether the piece was printable or possibly if with small changes it became, so I would say that victorious solved all my doubts.

thank you so much to all for the answers, you have been of great help to understand this world better.

Good work to all!