can you do it in one piece?

[athlon]

Forget that generator. that is a "game" (as sympathetic and useful for its purpose) to generate templates to print and cut out hobbistic use.
the module there is not because they consider instead a "circumferential pass" that assigns a distance between the teeth.
in mechanics is not so; it is used precisely the module that represents the height of the tooth between the primitive circumference and the outer circumference (and "contempla inside" uniquely shape and size characteristics):

m=øp/z or m=øe/(z+2)

the series of modules available for "normal" wheels is standardized, you do not choose a random number to return the accounts.. except for special cases, and then we talk about correct teething.

However here you are a general infarination:View attachment 14728and a catalog page for commercials:View attachment 14729greetings
Marco:smile:

ok I read a little pdf (I admit not all) and to what I understood the ideal toothed wheel would be a bielicoidal to conjugated profiles :tongue:

instead from the pdf of the catalog I have seen that wheels similar to what I think are not there, especially considering that for weight needs and encumbrance the everything will probably be realized in scale 1:2

p.s. confirms that the entirety between the two pins must be the sum of the primitives of the two toothed wheels

 

[sampom]

p.s. confirms that the entirety between the two pins must be the sum of the primitives of the two toothed wheels

if by "pins" you mean the axes/albers on which the pair of wheels is mounted (the gear) that they gear together, the cling is given by the sum of rays primitive.. :finger:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[Fulvio Romano]

ok I read a little pdf (I admit not all) and to what I understood the ideal toothed wheel would be a bielicoidal to conjugated profiles :tongue:

teeth are always conjugated profiles.
helical or bielicoidal teeth only serve for large pairs and/or large speeds and/or large precisions.
the straight tooth integrates all together and drains everything together, so a little 'bate', the helical tooth comes into contact with the homologue a little at a time, while other teeth start slowly to fade, therefore the movement is much more fluid, but for low pairs and for machines of the type alternating regime (for example alternative engines) it is not worth it.
Remember that the straight teeth do them with a toothpick, the helical ones are milled to cn.

 

[sampom]

Remember that the straight teeth do them with a toothpick, the helical ones are milled to cn.

no, not necessarily and not obligatoryly in this order..:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[Fulvio Romano]

no, not necessarily and not obligatoryly in this order..:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

Did I hit?
explains. .

 

[cliff23]

Hi.

I would say that there should be no problem with turning if not that
to create an ad hoc tool. on the contrary you are sure that we do not
are problems generating teeth?
judging by the sketch the wheels have a blind part.