• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

carpentry using beam elements

  • Thread starter Thread starter UGNXFabrizio
  • Start date Start date

UGNXFabrizio

Guest
Good morning to all,
with this I cancel the previous discussion in which I had made a mistake in the title.
at this moment I can not realize structures using beam elements, someone knows the various steps to define the geometric pattern, transform it into fem and then realize the verification of the structure.
you know how to tell me about the links where to find dispenses, videos about it
bye
 
So... I can see the discussion under nx even if from the questions I see it seems more relevant to me if, for which I make a small comparison, perhaps also useless, between these forms of nx and if.
in nx the module that manages the modeling of carpenters, practically the correspondent of the structures or frames in solid.edge, is called routing machanical is a module apart and ago: carpenteries, piping of plants with their logical scheme and plants on boardmachine.
While for finite element analysis, you also have the simulation module, and sincerely I don't know anything about that... I know only that when you talk about nx or cad of this price range, each module really costs a bang and the expense must be worth the enterprise!
It is not as if with the full license of if you somehow manage to have frame or frame and beam analysis (inserted in st4) through simulation.
for if manuals and exercises, something is inside the installation, something maybe found on the net.
for manual nx and exercises, they release them to you at courses.
this because the cads of the fascia of itself are more intuitive, while for nx you have to have a support and knowledge at the base.
are 2 different worlds
Good job
 
hello pizza3d, I confirm that the discussion concerns nx.
starting from the model did not allow me to go to realize the unifilare scheme on which in fem environment it is possible to slide the section (i.e. the profile) and therefore have the beam element and not solid.
I assume that the road you indicated me is the right one, as soon as I get some results, I'll let you know.
Thank you
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
ciao
Back
Top