• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

case of unusual work

  • Thread starter Thread starter eugi
  • Start date Start date

eugi

Guest
Good morning to all and good year! !

What is the best way to deal with the following work?

I was asked by a friend working in the building industry to provide him with a design for the installation of marble tiles. Such tiles,as they have a substantial cost, must have a preliminary work to the cad to reduce as much as possible the rubble and know the actual requirement.

I am proceeding by inserting tiles once at a time or performing repeats in series where it is possible. the main problem I find it at the corners where the brick must be cut to follow on the wall at 90°.

to simplify I tried to consider everything in a part file, so that I can apply the winding function, or to consider the tiles as extrusions on a flat wall and then to cut and tilt 90° the wall sectors, but in this way I can not avail myself of the distinct for the quantities.

I would be grateful for suggestions or suggestions.
thanks for any interventions.
 

Attachments

  • camera+mattonelle.webp
    camera+mattonelle.webp
    2.5 KB · Views: 127
  • angolomattonelle.webp
    angolomattonelle.webp
    3.3 KB · Views: 125
Good morning to all and good year! !

What is the best way to deal with the following work?

I was asked by a friend working in the building industry to provide him with a design for the installation of marble tiles. Such tiles,as they have a substantial cost, must have a preliminary work to the cad to reduce as much as possible the rubble and know the actual requirement.

I am proceeding by inserting tiles once at a time or performing repeats in series where it is possible. the main problem I find it at the corners where the brick must be cut to follow on the wall at 90°.

to simplify I tried to consider everything in a part file, so that I can apply the winding function, or to consider the tiles as extrusions on a flat wall and then to cut and tilt 90° the wall sectors, but in this way I can not avail myself of the distinct for the quantities.

I would be grateful for suggestions or suggestions.
thanks for any interventions.
hello and good year.

apart from what I think you were doing first with a quick hand-cuff.. Anyway. .
I didn't understand how and where you would apply thecoils; a tile on the corner/spigol? curious as mode. .this to count a whole tile for each "corner" (the sum of the two cut parts)?
already, but how are the tiles (in length I mean)? from what little I can see (how did you post images "unlinked" that cannot be opened?) you have three (at least) types of height, and length? and vertically the joints how should they be, in line or staggered? and if you stagger as, by chance or according to an order that periodically repeats? This information is used to understand how to restart after "the turn", so it is not said that you can always use the same remaining part from the cutting of the previous one.
most likely while having different lengths will be multiple between them, so that laid after a "certain frequency" are all within a square (or rectangle). . Here, you should first throw down "the sketch" of the "drawing" you want to get and from that start to finish the wall.

Sure that if you don't do it together in the part you can't have a distinct quantity; unless.. you could do the sketch of the tile sections and save them in weldment profiles. the part will be a welded multibody where you insert the structural elements (your tiles) on the sketch tracks you will have made according to that design you wanted to get. just a sketch for each row of type of tiles (and for each wall, clear), then repeat them vertically alternating them. besides the quantities you will also have the distinct cut.

the cutter It is a craft far from simple, but if you turn to an experienced poser you will see that it solves the problem of quantities and provisions without so many complications, only with a nickname in the place to tile.

greetings
Mar
 
it would be a sort of separate cut that, in my opinion, you would do much faster with autocad or dwg editor
 
it would be a sort of separate cut that, in my opinion, you would do much faster with autocad or dwg editor
That's what I said.
but even earlier still with pen and a sheet of square paper:biggrin:

..ciao _re_, good year

greetings
Marco:smile:
 
apart from what I think you were doing first with a quick hand-cuff.. .
the problem is more complex than I explained; I provide more details.

in practice the tiles are of three types: 100x1200, 150x1200, 200x1200. of two types has limited quantities while one can provide a requirement to determine. I therefore believe that a work at the cad can actually be useful to him because the layout of the tiles must take into account the different quantities. Moreover after arranged everything must show it to the customer to proceed.
the poser is a craft far from simple, but if you turn to an experienced poser you will see that it solves the problem of quantities and provisions without so many complications, only with a nickname in the place to tile.
I agree but as I told you the case in question is different from that of simply having to tile a wall. the tiles which it has in limited quantities have a high cost is to do as little as possible.

So in detail what I'm trying to achieve is a system in which depending on the layout of the tiles I get an update in the distinct materials until I find the optimal configuration between quantity and laying in operation, moreover when I move the tiles in the horizontal sense it should not miss the "piegamattonella"-"pigolo wall", that is, the fold must update automatically. I managed to get this by setting constraints between sketches for tile cuts and wall edges. Unfortunately I am doing the work tile at a time and between constraints settings and creations of different configurations to have more folds of the stax type of brick the work becomes sleek.
and if you stagger as, by chance or according to an order that periodically repeats?
as detailed above, are three types to be arranged preferential to "spaccamattone" as from figure that place.
you would do much faster with autocad or dwg editor
Yes! there is also specific fallcor for the sector, but I have solidworks and I cannot do otherwise.

thanks for your interventions.
 

Attachments

  • cameramattonelle.webp
    cameramattonelle.webp
    39 KB · Views: 19
  • camera+mattonelle.webp
    camera+mattonelle.webp
    2.5 KB · Views: 104
If I condo me, it would be worth considering it as a set, every brick a part, to make a table of the marble tiles and of the total and to extrapolate the distinct base with the quantities of the individual parts (the tiles), and you would also have the designs of the tiles.

distinct greetings to all
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
ciao
Back
Top