choice of the study path, advice?

[38luglio]

but what kind of speeches, that is choosing a course of studies and you (meccanicamg) ask him in what company he wants to work, in what office and with what role?

Today, after so years of work experience, I still don't know what I want to do, I have changed my job recently, chasing me below and discovering only to things made that the new job is a pussy, much more than the precedent, and that I could change even before.

you are confusing the university with the company upgrade courses.

Then, this is a dialogue that must serve to understand what to choose, not think that some of us will choose for you.
In fact, no, I choose. I'll break your thighs.

I'm sorry fulvio, for "figata" you mean your new job really turned out to be what you studied for? in previous experiences instead not? I ask you because I have had the opportunity to read in this forum your position in favor of the old figure of engineer at the expense of that of "pseudoingegnere/perito".

 

[meccanicamg]

then do so:
- if you want to be a senior designer, free professional, researcher, developer r&d, contractor and technical director do the 5 years
- if you want to make the junior and senior designer, do the technical office manager, company planner, responsible for design and troubleshooting workshop, r&d with a little bit more effort or still working in teem, do mechanics and do some extra course

However the two figures are interchangeable except for the signature responsibilities from free professionals even if it is not so completely.

Tell us what you want to do when you grow up.

 

[Fulvio Romano]

choose the course of studies not based on what you like, but based on what you want to do as a big you will have 2 negative effects:
1. risk studying stuff that you don't get passionate about, as a result of being slower in your studies

2. If when you grow up to find out that you don't really like that job, which is very possible because you see it from outside, you're a cat.

 

[Fulvio Romano]

However, I am not against the short engineer and in favor of the long one. I simply do not like the two careers to be confused.

with the fact of the new work I meant that on paper it seemed less interesting and above all less professionalizing of the old, than however I was forced to leave incompatibility with the new superiors. Moreover it is a very far from the topics I studied. I'm doing a lot more engineer now than before.

 

[marcofranz]

I finally joined the training path. Those two years will not be worthless.