[cime9] question about separate and random numbering of components

[Plaguebreath]

Good morning to all, I have the following problem and I ask you if you can solve it somehow or as you do to bypass the problem.
I have a compound x set. At this point I ask for a separate component of this mold when creating an excell file made as follows.. .

No. q.ta standard size rough material hardness

67 2 cooling blades l135 14.7 x 2.5 x 135 stainless steel

Now, my scheduling program does not support an import of the toptron distinta and I have to manually create a commission composed of all the distinct voices with the rule type:
numbercommitted/numberdifferent

all right though laborious, but here's the problem, after a while it happens that maybe in the project they have to add y normalized to the assieme. with the new exit in distinct but the numbering changes!!!! and therefore all the work done before is to be thrown!
Now I wonder, is there any way to block the numbering of the various components of the assembly for fre so that the next pieces added start from the last number in db + 1 ??? or what techniques do you use? thanks for patience, good day!

 

[stinit]

Good morning to all, I have the following problem and I ask you if you can solve it somehow or as you do to bypass the problem.
I have a compound x set. At this point I ask for a separate component of this mold when creating an excell file made as follows.. .

No. q.ta standard size rough material hardness

67 2 cooling blades l135 14.7 x 2.5 x 135 stainless steel

Now, my scheduling program does not support an import of the toptron distinta and I have to manually create a commission composed of all the distinct voices with the rule type:
numbercommitted/numberdifferent

all right though laborious, but here's the problem, after a while it happens that maybe in the project they have to add y normalized to the assieme. with the new exit in distinct but the numbering changes!!!! and therefore all the work done before is to be thrown!
Now I wonder, is there any way to block the numbering of the various components of the assembly for fre so that the next pieces added start from the last number in db + 1 ??? or what techniques do you use? thanks for patience, good day!

eeee...for now save the various distinct and then the "assembly" manually :tongue:

 

[Plaguebreath]

I don't believe it... is there anyone who does things like this with the bug???? seems to ask astronomical things when it should be a banality...

 

[stinit]

I don't believe it... is there anyone who does things like this with the bug???? seems to ask astronomical things when it should be a banality...

depends on which sector you work... I rarely have to update an assembly by adding new elements. . .and obviously there is to those who happen more...I instead of you would signal this exigency to your microsystem distributor of zone...maybe in the next relays this defect will correct you:finger:

 

[monster]

Hello I have your same problem!!!! a real boredom put everything back in order, then with the button to move the lines... you don't spend any more... I'm begging the renaming system is that it's inside a param file... I still have to put my hand on it.

 

[Plaguebreath]

@stinit I don't work there directly with the bugs but the technicians with whom I work always feel my porconates because such a system is unmanageable for any quality system that respects. ah then the distributors are fantastic, it is from 8.5 that I ask something like this and as a result I got a worsening system of making prints with absurd parametric, and the promise that my observations will be taken into consideration ... maybe for the 11

@monster at least I'm not alone, if nothing else comforts me.

 

[stinit]

@stinit I don't work there directly with the bugs but the technicians with whom I work always feel my porconates because such a system is unmanageable for any quality system that respects. ah then the distributors are fantastic, it is from 8.5 that I ask something like this and as a result I got a worsening system of making prints with absurd parametric, and the promise that my observations will be taken into consideration ... maybe for the 11

@monster at least I'm not alone, if nothing else comforts me.

If that's why I sent him a sheet a4 full changes and improvements I need every day... ...I hope they take into account...even because with this crisis the number of companies that pay annual updates are decreasing...it is better to listen to the imputs of those who still support them:wink:

 

[monster]

... then... in the folder...

c:\cimatron\cimatrone\program\it\dat\defdata

a file called bom_template_ita.csv

this file should be the default for creating the distinct.. .

instead this idnum.dat

and what creates id to loaded parts by associating the number

so the evidence to do is these

make a paste copy of the two files, edit the text and see in function of the edited text what happens in separate fact this if it works you can't act on the id... I know it turns out macchinoso but if you don't try in this way we always remain in canvas brags

if everything works correctly one can create what he likes to set in distinction...that if we wait for microsystems...you want...it is why then in the site they put you "you want to work with us?"

bai bai

 

[Mocca]

Hello plaguebreath.
but after creating for the first voltra, you used the "renaming" function. toptron, I don't know why, start numbering the details from 900; with the renumbering departed from 1. This way, perhaps, you could solve problems.
Mouth

 

[garide]

Good evening

Maybe I'll be the usual voice outside the choir, but I've never seen any problems with the distinct, I'll explain.

it happens very often (at least always ) that after a first phase of design the customer asks me the provisional distinction of the steels to carry out the order, and if the mold is complex also of accessories + important to be found, type cylinders merkle, platerine sankyo etc...

at this moment I create the distinct in ciamtrone putting in order the pieces as they hold me, 1-matrice 2-punzone 3-tavolino sup 4-tavolino inf and so on.

when you can towards the end of the project I refer it to give it more complete I never happened that I move or change number the details that previously arranged.

I have a custom "bom_template_ita.csv" according to my needs, :biggrin:

once completed both the materials and the accessories, usually the details start from 1 up to 500 and the accessories from 500 on, if I add something I set "idnum.dat" that any particular leaves from 900 on then so that I can find them and add them second position and need

for monsters

What do you mean by "then with the button to move the lines "