Anchorage
Guest
Finally:at the end of the video the news of the versionhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zu_p5b-i1fiI look forward to more details after the October fairs...
Finally:at the end of the video the news of the versionhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zu_p5b-i1fiI look forward to more details after the October fairs...
gfrank
Guest
some perplexity:
- for the yellow and roosi says there will be a tool: what does it mean? is "something" outside the sw and must be updated to each version?
- for free forms says it will be possible to import them from schetch up. so you have to learn to use on? and how much will they be compatible with buildingsus?
... mah!!! !
I'll jump to the made expo to understand better...
- for the yellow and roosi says there will be a tool: what does it mean? is "something" outside the sw and must be updated to each version?
- for free forms says it will be possible to import them from schetch up. so you have to learn to use on? and how much will they be compatible with buildingsus?
... mah!!! !
I'll jump to the made expo to understand better...
alpearchitetto
Guest
without anything to remove, which offers good problems, this bim seems to me a little limited (render type cartoon):redface:
Tristan
Guest
I remain of my idea. unless you have the various termus, primus, decujus (lol) and fellow singer, this product makes no sense to exist. the things they show in the video revit made her more than 10 years ago. I have not been able to understand how much cost I am buildingus, even because if it costs more than 2000€ I cannot in my opinion compete with revit lt ne with archicad star(t) edition
alpearchitetto
Guest
I fully agree with tristan:finger:
gfrank
Guest
I was made expo and I reviewed the presentation. the comparison I do with revit.
I have transposed this: buildingsus is a sw for the architectural design (pass me the term) "pure" in the sense that it does not contemplate the "direct architectural management" (i.e. managed directly from the sw) of other elements (to understand the families) of architectural structures (traves and pillars) and plants . to draw them and calculate them (progetting them) need the specific sw of the act: edilus - electrical plants - etc., with which it interfaces directly (type revit all in one).
of course once created and imported into buildingsus, they are manageable at an architectural level (visualization - material management - views - etc.)
walls, floors, roofs, do not contemplate "stratigraphies". textures can be applied on external states. to understand it is as if they were "masses" and on the surface (external/internal/side) the texture is applied.
I understood well, the internal representation of any layers is managed only with retini/texture. in the representation of the plant/section, we see the layers (to various details), but precisely they are retini/texture.
the insertion and management of the families is similar to revit, but the absence of the layers (believe) allows a better "relationality" between the same families (compared to revit), therefore leaner and faster: cuts - join - copy - divide - etc..
there are better management tools (insertion/modification) (compared to revit) or at least support the user more intuitively.
the management of families (in the project), seems, easier: For example, the modification of the size of a window, as well as the impact of the measurements (in the properties) allows a "dynamic" change directly with the mouse. This change directly affects the individual type, without having to rename it.
the basic archive of the families: doors - windows - accessories, looks very rich. are editable (I don't know the level of editing/creation management (new).
the management of temporal phases, is similar to revit (demolition/construction - yellow/red): instead of the hammer there is the demolitor.
it is possible to view the temporal passage between two phases, in a "dynamic" way: or there is a cursor, which moves it, gradually turns off the previous phase and turns on the next time phase, and vice versa: both in demolished mode built, and in yellow/red mode. There are probably no other management filters, like : only demolished - only built, etc.
the management of roofs, stairs, railings, parapets, is simpler and supported by multiple tools, which allow the edit with the only use of the mouse.
the current sin, however, given the young age of the sw is that of the free forms, for which he leans on sketch up.
the passageway/return is managed directly in the sw: it is exported to a "group" (as defined in revit) it changes with on, and it re-imports in modified buildingsus: I can't tell you the degree of management of modified parts brought within the sw.
I think that even for irregular masonry (rastremate) it is necessary to use up.
rendering commands are similar to those of revit:with/without shadows, dpi, etc. high resolution ones are excellent, but they are not able to report on material management (in families).
excellent is the management of the photo insertion. there are lines of "prospective" that allow the insertion of the model according to the other references (e.g.: manufactured) present in the photos . It is possible to select objects present in the photo (e.g. cars - fences - trees - poles - etc.) that can remain in the foreground (in front of the inserted model). the model can be inserted with the change of shadows, so as to bring them in projection similar to those of the photo.
currently, which has particularly impressed me, is the interoperativeness with other sw of the acca: to date, structural, thermal, metric compute (estimative), electrical plants (it is possible that I forgot something).
really simple computation. the reference price is opened in a view, the measuring parameters are defined, the object is touched (family) and ... made (for example, for a window you select the compute item (with its price), the measuring parameters are inserted (e.g. length and width), the plane (level), you touch the object with the mouse, and here is the compute. made for a family, all the same types (for example, all the windows) if selected are all brought into the compute.
for the walls, just select the "internal face" (a kind of command "painting" in revit) and the surface is computed, with/without the blanks.
for structures and plants, the computation is done directly with its design/calculum sw.
prices:
Buildingus 2000 (sub 300, I think)
- edilus ca 2000
- primus 500
- termus 500
- implanttus (electric + hydraulic) 1200
I have transposed this: buildingsus is a sw for the architectural design (pass me the term) "pure" in the sense that it does not contemplate the "direct architectural management" (i.e. managed directly from the sw) of other elements (to understand the families) of architectural structures (traves and pillars) and plants . to draw them and calculate them (progetting them) need the specific sw of the act: edilus - electrical plants - etc., with which it interfaces directly (type revit all in one).
of course once created and imported into buildingsus, they are manageable at an architectural level (visualization - material management - views - etc.)
walls, floors, roofs, do not contemplate "stratigraphies". textures can be applied on external states. to understand it is as if they were "masses" and on the surface (external/internal/side) the texture is applied.
I understood well, the internal representation of any layers is managed only with retini/texture. in the representation of the plant/section, we see the layers (to various details), but precisely they are retini/texture.
the insertion and management of the families is similar to revit, but the absence of the layers (believe) allows a better "relationality" between the same families (compared to revit), therefore leaner and faster: cuts - join - copy - divide - etc..
there are better management tools (insertion/modification) (compared to revit) or at least support the user more intuitively.
the management of families (in the project), seems, easier: For example, the modification of the size of a window, as well as the impact of the measurements (in the properties) allows a "dynamic" change directly with the mouse. This change directly affects the individual type, without having to rename it.
the basic archive of the families: doors - windows - accessories, looks very rich. are editable (I don't know the level of editing/creation management (new).
the management of temporal phases, is similar to revit (demolition/construction - yellow/red): instead of the hammer there is the demolitor.
it is possible to view the temporal passage between two phases, in a "dynamic" way: or there is a cursor, which moves it, gradually turns off the previous phase and turns on the next time phase, and vice versa: both in demolished mode built, and in yellow/red mode. There are probably no other management filters, like : only demolished - only built, etc.
the management of roofs, stairs, railings, parapets, is simpler and supported by multiple tools, which allow the edit with the only use of the mouse.
the current sin, however, given the young age of the sw is that of the free forms, for which he leans on sketch up.
the passageway/return is managed directly in the sw: it is exported to a "group" (as defined in revit) it changes with on, and it re-imports in modified buildingsus: I can't tell you the degree of management of modified parts brought within the sw.
I think that even for irregular masonry (rastremate) it is necessary to use up.
rendering commands are similar to those of revit:with/without shadows, dpi, etc. high resolution ones are excellent, but they are not able to report on material management (in families).
excellent is the management of the photo insertion. there are lines of "prospective" that allow the insertion of the model according to the other references (e.g.: manufactured) present in the photos . It is possible to select objects present in the photo (e.g. cars - fences - trees - poles - etc.) that can remain in the foreground (in front of the inserted model). the model can be inserted with the change of shadows, so as to bring them in projection similar to those of the photo.
currently, which has particularly impressed me, is the interoperativeness with other sw of the acca: to date, structural, thermal, metric compute (estimative), electrical plants (it is possible that I forgot something).
really simple computation. the reference price is opened in a view, the measuring parameters are defined, the object is touched (family) and ... made (for example, for a window you select the compute item (with its price), the measuring parameters are inserted (e.g. length and width), the plane (level), you touch the object with the mouse, and here is the compute. made for a family, all the same types (for example, all the windows) if selected are all brought into the compute.
for the walls, just select the "internal face" (a kind of command "painting" in revit) and the surface is computed, with/without the blanks.
for structures and plants, the computation is done directly with its design/calculum sw.
prices:
Buildingus 2000 (sub 300, I think)
- edilus ca 2000
- primus 500
- termus 500
- implanttus (electric + hydraulic) 1200
Last edited:
eco77
Guest
thanks for the gfrank review!
gfrank
Guest
trial version is available for 30 days:http://www.acca.it/software/edifici...nica-bim/trial-gratis/tabid/1923/default.aspx
gfrank
Guest
I tried to cuff a little on the sw.
I confirm the above mentioned in the review, except for beams and pillars (architectonics) that are "inclusive" in the sw.
the management of free forms (made with skecthup) in the sw, includes only the management of the retini/texture. do not interact that sw objects (doors/windows).
use is very intuitive, the fast learning curve.
I would give a vote of 6.5. if they do not need free form, even a 7
I confirm the above mentioned in the review, except for beams and pillars (architectonics) that are "inclusive" in the sw.
the management of free forms (made with skecthup) in the sw, includes only the management of the retini/texture. do not interact that sw objects (doors/windows).
use is very intuitive, the fast learning curve.
I would give a vote of 6.5. if they do not need free form, even a 7
SnakeBlack
Guest
looking on the network for photo-insertion programs, I came across this forum. thanks to gfrank I found in buildingsus (use the trial version!) a great program to quickly and easily realize my photosinserimenti! ! !
a greeting to the team and again thank you.... .
a greeting to the team and again thank you.... .