compilation cut list

[SolidUser]

in the last 3 years I have opened several juices for welded, some of which resolved and others not.
I can assure you that before accusing the cad I look at us 20 times, but I guarantee that it happens, even if not very often.
I try to use statistically more stable functions and with mirrors opened a few sprs.
now I have a big problem open for months that concerns the mirrored parts (always with welds), 2 spr open from May and no solution for the moment.... too few reports!

the sr is the opening of the call by the var and the spr open it for a malfunction that is not said is caused by a real sw bug.
the spr serves to be assigned and verified.
It could happen that they tell you that there is a cad limitation or in the operations you performed.
Why don't you attach an example file?

 

[Tantocattivo]

You just said... open (right button on the profile) the item from the welding profile library, go edit sketch, select everything, copy, odds covered,
and paste it on a floor or a face of the part where you want to extrude.
easy. :finger:

I thought there was a window with a drop-down menu or any interface that would serve to put sketches already made (in my case normalized profiles) inside the sketch I'm doing. instead you tell me that you have to open the file with the sketch and "volgarmente" I cover it and take off in the other sketch that I opened in the other drawing.

...mha?
the "saved" è part!

I actually use improper terms when I write! I will try to write better:tongue: I meant to write that I wanted to know how to select a profile not in the "structural memory". but reading above I understand.


you looked in resources. . . How did I tell you? ?
there are all profiles already made:http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=13375&page=2Hello
marco

Thanks, I downloaded the file now, I didn't do it yet because I wanted to figure out how they were doing and they were using it and then I would download it.

 

[Mike1967]

I thought there was a window with a drop-down menu or any interface that would serve to put sketches already made (in my case normalized profiles) inside the sketch I'm doing. instead you tell me that you have to open the file with the sketch and "volgarmente" I cover it and take off in the other sketch that I opened in the other drawing.quotas)

you can still "volgarmente" :biggrin: save the sketches you use most often as
blocks in a specific folder that will be taken easily.
with swks there are a thousand ways to do something...:finger:

 

[sampom]

........

but for what purpose do you draw (or import) a "profile" in the sketch? ?
when you need them add them as structural members in any part simply pulling a line for the extrusion direction.
sketches should be as simple as possible.

greetings
Mar

 

[Tantocattivo]

but for what purpose do you draw (or import) a "profile" in the sketch? ?
when you need them add them as structural members in any part simply pulling a line for the extrusion direction.
sketches should be as simple as possible.

greetings
Mar

practically every time I have to extrude a profile I recommend using the structural members? To make a trivial example, in a table my feet should be made in a structural member? I usually do that, and then I extrude the height of the table that interests me.
with structural member now should I make four groups to be able to turn the profile? I would like to put them all like the square on the top left.

 

[sampom]

practically every time I have to extrude a profile I recommend using the structural members? To make a trivial example, in a table my feet should be made in a structural member? I usually do that, and then I extrude the height of the table that interests me.
with structural member now should I make four groups to be able to turn the profile? I would like to put them all like the square on the top left.

Well. .
clear that if your "structural members" are simple pictures/rectangles/tondi you probably do first with the normal extrusion (but the sketch of a square the drawing to the flight, I certainly do not care that I put more time). but if you need the automatic cut, you will have to do it with the members.
first you talked about travi he, or anyway of "complex" profiles; In this case, the structural members are useful and avoid weighting the sketch by drawing/importing them.

Then you don't need to make four groups to turn one by one. from the same function/command, with a single support sketch (3d in that case of the table), touches the lines of the legs interspersed with the button new group e profile and from time to time check the remarkable point/spigol to give you the correct position.
out of the command, in the feature manager you will see that there is only one function of structural element.

I mean, it depends on what you have to do.
It is up to you to try and hang yourself to decide what is the fastest way. finding the right relationship between speed and "performances"; you need to keep the file as light and manageable as possible. . and sketches too elaborate are always not recommended, as well as too many/needless features.

greetings
Mar

 

[Tantocattivo]

Well. .
clear that if your "structural members" are simple pictures/rectangles/tondi you probably do first with the normal extrusion (but the sketch of a square the drawing to the flight, I certainly do not care that I put more time). but if you need the automatic cut, you will have to do it with the members.
first you talked about travi he, or anyway of "complex" profiles; In this case, the structural members are useful and avoid weighting the sketch by drawing/importing them.

Then you don't need to make four groups to turn one by one. from the same function/command, with a single support sketch (3d in that case of the table), touches the lines of the legs interspersed with the button new group e profile and from time to time check the remarkable point/spigol to give you the correct position.
out of the command, in the feature manager you will see that there is only one function of structural element.

I mean, it depends on what you have to do.
It is up to you to try and hang yourself to decide what is the fastest way. finding the right relationship between speed and "performances"; you need to keep the file as light and manageable as possible. . and sketches too elaborate are always not recommended, as well as too many/needless features.

greetings
Mar

Okay, thanks, cmq with 4 groups I meant what you explained to me.
then I see how I am doing the blocks like mike1967 said.