components in a set

[Bryan]

Good morning to all, I write to ask you users of sw a parare, and understand what could be the most used way to manage assemblies.
the question is this: when you create a set and you have parts to which
1) they will not have movements and will be inside the axieme as static components.
2) each part has already been drawn with the correct origin referred to the origin of the assieme therefore once inserted they will already go in the right place.
do you prefer in any case that such parts (or sub-axis) are inserted and left "fixes" or are inserted by "furnitures" and then with various references, such as giving quotas with the 3 axes, lead to be "completely defined" ?
I know that the final result is the same, that is to have the component in the right and static place, but according to you it is better to use the fixed command or in any case you put it mobile and then given the references?
I hope I've been quite clear, thank you all.
Good job!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

theoretically a particular fixed has an impact on the best performance of one with the constraints.
do two identical together with the two modes and view the performance

 

[tzadik]

how are the parts generated? individually or multibody extraction?
do you need to make the parametric axieme (... and consequently also the parts)?

 

[SimoneCRV]

I would be curious about these results too

 

[Bryan]

Meanwhile thanks for the answers, then the parts are obtained with extraction method from existing body (in practice sliced the starting piece I have) and then reconstruct it in a set that will contain the various parts all well divided.