snaroz
Guest
hello to all, I had been thinking a little about the concept of tolerance and I wanted to know if what I write is correct. from what I read, the concept of tolerance was first put into practice by a German company in 1905 in order to reduce the number of pieces discarded after the various stages of processing. before the introduction of this concept the dimensions of the pieces that were drawn were established by simply assigning a number to the size in question. if the dimensions of the piece coming out of the workshop were equal to those written and drawn by the designer, this was accepted; if the size of the piece was greater, this subdued adjustment operations in order to reach the expected values; Finally, if this was smaller than those of the project, it was obviously discarded. the problem that soon came out was that respecting the nominal dimensions imposed on drawing was very difficult, and therefore many pieces were discarded or had to suffer expensive adjustment operations, resulting in levitation of costs, waste of material and time. strictly respect the nominal dimensions was difficult because of the inevitable inaccuracies of the processing processes, imperfections of the machine tools etc...the idea therefore that lies at the base of the concept of tolerance and that will solve the problem of the waste of pieces however good, of time, and of money is the following: the designers sensed that being rigorous in the assignment of the size of the pieces was a useless complication: mechanical parts perform their function even if the dimensions are slightly different from the nominal ones. Let's make an example. Suppose we draw a tree and a hub that must mate slightly forced. Suppose we assign to the diameter of the shaft the value 30 mm, and to that of the hole the value 29,8. Now when the workshop goes to work and produce the piece, it will hardly be able to respect values 30 and 29,8. You can go to [Bleep] and you can match the required values, or not. In that case, or would throw the pieces or would work them further, resulting in cost levitation. But let's note that the coupling suits me the same even if the tree coming out of the workshop has a diameter of 30,1 and the hub of 29,7. the coupling is forced the same, so I'm fine. the designers then realized that instead of assigning to a dimension only one numerical value needed, to solve the problem of waste etc..., assigning them a range of values, compatibly with the function that the piece planned had to have. It is evident that for the workshop it is much easier than a piece has a length falling in range 29,8-30,5, than do not respect the value 30,1. These concepts were then put into practice by various companies to extend to various countries, and to make order since probably each company quotated the pieces in its own way intervened whose purpose was basically to uniform the notation at the graphic level.
therefore submitting a project without dimensional or geometric tolerances would mean to subject the workshop to which the piece is asked to be manufactured to a high stress, as well as to increase considerably times and production costs. of each mechanical component you must understand the function well; Do this, you have to understand what the range inside which can vary the size and shape of the object, but always guarantee the functionality of the piece....then that you say, there are according to you
?
Good evening
therefore submitting a project without dimensional or geometric tolerances would mean to subject the workshop to which the piece is asked to be manufactured to a high stress, as well as to increase considerably times and production costs. of each mechanical component you must understand the function well; Do this, you have to understand what the range inside which can vary the size and shape of the object, but always guarantee the functionality of the piece....then that you say, there are according to you
Good evening