• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

configurations

  • Thread starter Thread starter TECNOMODEL
  • Start date Start date

TECNOMODEL

Guest
I am trying to sharpen the method with this software for me new, now I would like to better understand the configuration speech.
I have already seen that I can create a configuration in which to represent, for example, a different position of some components, for example a locking.
I came up with an idea and I did some evidence but with little results.
I created the model of a locking with the configuration in open position and saved it (in .pkg)
in a second .pkg I have another configuration where I represent other components in an open position.
loading within the .pkg single locking .pkg, the configuration works.
if, however, the one already present in the axieme that of the single locking is disabled, if the individual reacts, obviously, the axieme is disabled.
my idea was to create the various blockings that are used with its opening configuration, then once inserted in the various groups/equipments create a configuration in which to activate those of the individual locks.
the final goal was to have a configuration that made me see open both the components and the various standardized locks already at the library, without having to move even the latter to view the condition.
Is that a feasible thing? Did I get the wrong way to try to do it?

Thank you for your help.

p.s. if the question is not understandable I try to explain myself better.
 
I am trying to sharpen the method with this software for me new, now I would like to better understand the configuration speech.
I have already seen that I can create a configuration in which to represent, for example, a different position of some components, for example a locking.
I came up with an idea and I did some evidence but with little results.
I created the model of a locking with the configuration in open position and saved it (in .pkg)
in a second .pkg I have another configuration where I represent other components in an open position.
loading within the .pkg single locking .pkg, the configuration works.
if, however, the one already present in the axieme that of the single locking is disabled, if the individual reacts, obviously, the axieme is disabled.
my idea was to create the various blockings that are used with its opening configuration, then once inserted in the various groups/equipments create a configuration in which to activate those of the individual locks.
the final goal was to have a configuration that made me see open both the components and the various standardized locks already at the library, without having to move even the latter to view the condition.
Is that a feasible thing? Did I get the wrong way to try to do it?

Thank you for your help.

p.s. if the question is not understandable I try to explain myself better.
If you want to display the same subaxieme with different positions (for example the same cylinder, once opened and another time closed) you do not have to use the configurations, which repeat identical in all subaxiemi cndivisi, but well yes' the command "annulla shared selection" (or something similar, I go to memory not having the software under hand).
 
my idea was to create the various blockings that are used with its opening configuration, then once inserted in the various groups/equipments create a configuration in which to activate those of the individual locks.
the final goal was to have a configuration that made me see open both the components and the various standardized locks already at the library, without having to move even the latter to view the condition.
the fundamental question is:
- are all subgroups shared within a single parent group and must remain permanently shared or are those species of fictitious groups you were talking about in previous messages?
- the configuration of the parent group you want to get is with all open locks or just some and closed others?
 
I try to be clearer:
now the customer's library contains items like thisBloccaggio_libreria.webpas you see it is composed of a group that contains 2 other groups, one for locking closed and one for the open position.
overlapping double parts and, to see the same open, you have to go look for group by group and turn off that in closed configuration.

now I have created the same locking in this wayBloccaggio chiuso.webpwith a simple configuration I represent it openBloccaggio aperto.webpI go to insert it into a project where I have, for example, a lever that can open and is stopped by the locking.
my idea was to create the configuration with the open lever and inside the same to show the open configuration of the locking.
only that if I activate the configuration of the main group I turn off that of the locking that is closed, if the locking one turns off that of the main group and the lever is in closed position.
Is that what I want to do?
 
my idea was to create the configuration with the open lever and inside the same to show the open configuration of the locking.
only that if I activate the configuration of the main group I turn off that of the locking that is closed, if the locking one turns off that of the main group and the lever is in closed position.
from what I understood the locking is a subgroup of the "lever design", if it is so enough to do:
- use configuration copy on the "open" configuration of the locking
- when you open the window of choice, click on the owner button and give as owner the "lever design"

doing so all the movements of the subgroup locking and the various information as choice of the objective and choice of the parts to be seen "on" when you activate the configuration, by commanding elements to video, are transported in the configuration of the parent group

if within the parent group "lever design" you have many shared "lock" subgroups and you want them to see all pers as long as you cover the configuration of only one lock at the top level and in the parent group the open configuration will have all open locks.

if instead inside the parent group you have more subgroup locks but not shared then you have to use the merge configuration command and merge all configurations of subgroups at the parent level.

Finally, if you have so many shared locking groups and want some to be open and others closed, do the steps listed at the beginning to open them all, then use the command to cancel selective shares on the parts of the shared subgroups that you want not to open even in the open configuration of the parent group and bring these parts back to the original position

I think, however, that in your case there is only one subgroup, so just copy the configuration by giving it as owner the parent group.

p.s. has little to do with the configuration, but it seemed to me to understand that the locking is a non-native group but supplied from the outside and then imported into modeling, if it is so good to use on all its parts both the recognize bevels command that the command recognizes fittings, indeed it is a good to do it also on the 3d that gives you your client himself because they could have been created by old 2ds of me10 without care.
 
the example posted was only for example. equipment is, of course, more complex and include various groups within the group that defines all the equipment (is that what is called father? ).

I managed to make it work if I create a configuration in the main group, then the locking group must be contained in the main and then, through configuration, the thing works.

I tried to make a copy, but something's wrong. if the locking group is contained in the main group the copy creates a new configuration within the main group, but this contains only the open position of the locking itself and has no use.
if the groups are to themselves the message comes out that the parts are not within the owner and does not create the new configuration.
I finally found a way, I create a configuration in the main group and I go to join this the various configurations of the locks or other.
thanks for the info.

As for the origin of those blockings I can't tell you, they've been using them for years like that, they're pkgs (1 by lock) and they're part of their library.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top