davide_r
Guest
I happen, more and more frequently, to come across by reading newspapers or advertisements on the internet, with requests of this type:
“cercasi mechanical designer with qualification or mechanical expert or graduate in engineering”.I allow myself to make some considerations that seem obvious but obviously not for everyone.
from a qualification or maturity degree to a degree in mechanical engineering there is a huge difference, so I do not understand how one can say or the other as if they were equivalent. not that an objective reality is to be considered degrading compared to another, but simply should be different and complementary roles. in university courses, as well as graduates know, examinations are included coma analysis 1 and 2, mechanics, technical drawing etc. a qualification must instead be considered as a “reduced” role and therefore with the possibility to cover in a flexible and flexible way functions that are not normally covered by an engineer. qualification or professional qualification diplomas require an education that takes care of the practical aspect, technical drawing knowledge, workshop work, foundry techniques, machine tools, welding, materials etc., as well as the theoretical one, while universities are more aimed at giving an academic theoretical preparation, therefore, because things work, roles should complete each other.
Moreover if I look for a graduate person, I will write “cercasi mechanical engineer” and it is perfectly useless to write with knowledge mechanical design since this is obvious because understood in his university preparation. in a few words it is as if a transport company that operates internationally sought a driver with a licence cqc, goods and adr and in requests of skills wrote “capable of driving the car”; and again, if the driver with the requirements to drive a tir drive the car who brings the goods with the car? Similarly if anyone studying a life to graduate is then employed eight hours a day to draw on a cad station, who performs the tasks that normally are of his competence for role, norm, tradition and nature?
“cercasi mechanical designer with qualification or mechanical expert or graduate in engineering”.I allow myself to make some considerations that seem obvious but obviously not for everyone.
from a qualification or maturity degree to a degree in mechanical engineering there is a huge difference, so I do not understand how one can say or the other as if they were equivalent. not that an objective reality is to be considered degrading compared to another, but simply should be different and complementary roles. in university courses, as well as graduates know, examinations are included coma analysis 1 and 2, mechanics, technical drawing etc. a qualification must instead be considered as a “reduced” role and therefore with the possibility to cover in a flexible and flexible way functions that are not normally covered by an engineer. qualification or professional qualification diplomas require an education that takes care of the practical aspect, technical drawing knowledge, workshop work, foundry techniques, machine tools, welding, materials etc., as well as the theoretical one, while universities are more aimed at giving an academic theoretical preparation, therefore, because things work, roles should complete each other.
Moreover if I look for a graduate person, I will write “cercasi mechanical engineer” and it is perfectly useless to write with knowledge mechanical design since this is obvious because understood in his university preparation. in a few words it is as if a transport company that operates internationally sought a driver with a licence cqc, goods and adr and in requests of skills wrote “capable of driving the car”; and again, if the driver with the requirements to drive a tir drive the car who brings the goods with the car? Similarly if anyone studying a life to graduate is then employed eight hours a day to draw on a cad station, who performs the tasks that normally are of his competence for role, norm, tradition and nature?