• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

continuous knives and 3d

  • Thread starter Thread starter tanticapelli
  • Start date Start date
tanticapelli said:
even just count how many identical assembly situations occur
in the sense that if I originally produced 10 identical pieces of m01, they create subfamilies (or a count) where maybe I will have 3 pieces of m01.a, 4 pieces of m01.b, 3 pieces of m01.c
Click to expand...
currently in your distinct is not so I imagine.
depends on how you manage the distinct; hypothesize that you set it with display of only parts, in this case you have to open your m01.a set and in the configuration choice open the properties and set the separate option in hide mode. so your set will be considered as a part.
I can't explain why I need to use memory terms.
If I have guessed right later I will try to be more precise.
 
rehearsal to integrate the previous speech.
in a set in configuration properties (although only one exists) there are various settings for management in separate materials.
among these there is also how the axieme must be considered according to the mode of the distinct.
necessary premise; the separate materials can be set to display only the parts, whether they are first-level or nested, or display only the first level, so you will see the components as in the axieme tree to which the separate is representative.
in the properties of the configuration I said there are three modes of representation in the distinct: show, hide, promote.
show: it is the default setting and means that the axieme will follow the distinct mode, i.e. if it displays the parts that make up the axieme; if you view the first level you will see the axieme (in case it is first level)
hide: the parts will never be shown and the separate will be listed
promotes: the axieme will not be considered and in the separate will always be displayed its parts.
a banal example is that of the cylinder built as a whole, but that for commercial reasons should be considered a unique element; In this case the hiding setting must be used.
link to the guideAxiemi configuration optioneffacesetting of separate materials
 
MassiVonWeizen said:
rehearsal to integrate the previous speech.
in a set in configuration properties (although only one exists) there are various settings for management in separate materials.
among these there is also how the axieme must be considered according to the mode of the distinct.
necessary premise; the separate materials can be set to display only the parts, whether they are first-level or nested, or display only the first level, so you will see the components as in the axieme tree to which the separate is representative.
in the properties of the configuration I said there are three modes of representation in the distinct: show, hide, promote.
show: it is the default setting and means that the axieme will follow the distinct mode, i.e. if it displays the parts that make up the axieme; if you view the first level you will see the axieme (in case it is first level)
hide: the parts will never be shown and the separate will be listed
promotes: the axieme will not be considered and in the separate will always be displayed its parts.
a banal example is that of the cylinder built as a whole, but that for commercial reasons should be considered a unique element; In this case the hiding setting must be used.
link to the guideAxiemi configuration optioneffacesetting of separate materials
Click to expand...
ok massive, the problem is that if I don't miss something in my case the distinct materials can not return what I want because in fact I have never created axioms organized for individual climbers or single assemblies.
so, while I was waiting for the interventions I did some tests and came to the conclusion of the photo.IMG_20201212_162347.webp
 
I did not understand your scheme, but for the matter of panels with accessories maybe proceeding for assemblies it seems to me the best way.
 
tanticapelli said:
ok massive, the problem is that if I don't miss something in my case the distinct materials can not return what I want because in fact I have never created axioms organized for individual climbers or single assemblies.
so, while I was waiting for the interventions I did some tests and came to the conclusion of the photo.View attachment 60339
Click to expand...
It's a supidaggine, I tried and it doesn't work. Don't try at home.
(I refer to the picture pattern)
 
MassiVonWeizen said:
I did not understand your scheme, but for the matter of panels with accessories maybe proceeding for assemblies it seems to me the best way.
Click to expand...
In fact, I had to create ad hoc microassiemi for the generation of each assembly graphic board.
 
returning to the beginning of the discussion, who has team working experience with solidworks without pdm could recommend how to operate in such a context?

like maybe everyone should take care of a part of the project (they are parts or assemblies) and then gather everything together in a single large group?

Would someone with team work experience have any suggestions?

Thank you.
 
+forte said:
......athena is a complete cad software package... .
Construction 2dconstruction 3dcalculation tools
sheet metal processingMaybe instead of buying solidworks was better an athena course for everyone, to learn to use it 100%
Click to expand...
because @tanticapelli You didn't match this? does not match the real and/or athena have any limits?
 
Sure, leave the time you find...

but you asked what program it was best to use to work 3d natively, and in the house you have one that how much stop He would.

So a legitimate question, in my opinion, is: are you sure that you are not using athena at 13% of the potential and that you actually already have the appropriate program, but you (you said clearly) in your colleagues who turn us off you know how to use it as it suits?

said the other terms: You're sure that instead of letting your colleagues learn how to use sw or anything, wouldn't you (but actually they) learn how to use the 3d part of athena? Obviously after evaluating whether he does what he promises in the brochures. . .

answer you only have:
 
ragnol said:
Sure, leave the time you find...

but you asked what program it was best to use to work 3d natively, and in the house you have one that how much stop He would.

So a legitimate question, in my opinion, is: are you sure that you are not using athena at 13% of the potential and that you actually already have the appropriate program, but you (you said clearly) in your colleagues who turn us off you know how to use it as it suits?

said the other terms: You're sure that instead of letting your colleagues learn how to use sw or anything, wouldn't you (but actually they) learn how to use the 3d part of athena? Obviously after evaluating whether he does what he promises in the brochures. . .

answer you only have:
Click to expand...
Yes I understand your position, but it is not to me that you should ask this question (as it is actually exploited) but to those who use athena...
And then I'm not the one who decides who has to do what, I only know that when there are large amounts of material to be baked (they're sheet rather than profiles of various kinds or both) they tend to converge on solidworks.

Let us say that this discussion would also have to serve to bring out some athena users who had had some experience/consiglio to give (which I would have liked and would have been useful to move the first steps in that software in case it was necessary) but alas, no one has yet made himself alive in this sense.
I don't understand that very few (to be tender) know this software, so the question I asked if it is better than the other software doesn't make much sense anymore.

as to the fact that solidworks is a "generalist" software I don't think it means that it's not okay to do anything (as opposed to what is said by the presentation of athena).
 
tanticapelli said:
Because I don't know how to use it and I haven't even installed it.
then excuse but of course that copy and paste what we find on the official sites. . .
Click to expand...
I quoted athena because you have it in the company where you work
and more disegna in 3dI repeat. disegna in 3dthen why use solidworks ifathena draws in 3d while in the first messages you say it draws only in 2d
Perhaps in all these months you would have learned to use it
You're weird.
you have colleagues in the company that use athena and ask for advice here
 
+forte said:
I quoted athena because you have it in the company where you work
and more disegna in 3dI repeat. disegna in 3dthen why use solidworks ifathena draws in 3d while in the first messages you say it draws only in 2d
Perhaps in all these months you would have learned to use it
You're weird.
you have colleagues in the company that use athena and ask for advice here
Click to expand...
Just tell me you're messing with me so I laugh
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
Back
Top