the key normally is long (intermediate space+b ).hello to all, I have to place a stick on a tree that receives movement from a reducer (see attached scheme). the doubt that came to me is: what is the best place to put the key? position b, and why?
Hello, everyone, thank you.
But if you don't put it, the tree-ended bar (wax + screw) will block the tree only in one way.Incidentally, that elastic ring seat you have on the tree side use, make it disappear.
that is the point where the tree will break, guaranteed to lemon.
I just suggested to take that trigger off the break.But if you don't put it, the tree-ended bar (wax + screw) will block the tree only in one way.
Better another joke rather!
for the rest, quoto in full.
Yes, shiren, that's true, too.Hi.
usually if there are no commercial probes
in that situation we try to build a "millerighi"
the two online keystrokes do not work
in fact they put two to 30-45°
these are my experiences
Thank you very much
It is not true that it would not work in the central part, the sides of the quarry are still there and are not downloaded.He wouldn't work in the middle.
greetings
Mar
requested by the customer only once (since 1989).you try to build a "millerighi"
Yes,It is not true that it would not work in the central part, the sides of the quarry are still there and are not downloaded.
the central part of the hole is discharged to facilitate the insertion and parade of the tree.
- That's right.returning to the proposed application, I would still point out that, in addition to looking at how and where to put the various mechanical parts, in absolute the swing that is between the exit plan from the reducer and the two gears is excessive.
the radial loads applicable on the shaft are indicated on the gearbox catalogues, it will be better to take a look before proceeding further.
I repeat that they are not my beliefs but simply what is located around (and as you see here also happens to see and discure solutions not properly to the "state of art" :biggrinFortunately I have never met "important" companies that practice these techniques.
Maybe.(I see that there are people who are late in the disco:biggrin: )
perfect, quoto.in front of frequent inversions of the direction of rotation, much better to use hollow shafts with calettatore.
Bye.
..well, it is not that you can say so to light heart "put only one on the side b(Language=work side as the tongue does with food in the mouthstick works on the back as the key in the patch does) eh eh eh
the reducer can bring two tabs
because it is reversible (you can leave both sides).
and in your case leave only the b because closer to the load.
If you want to put two because you don't trust or make the tree in fe360, then put a long one, because two separate people never work together
The seeger creates carving, come on.... kills how many mistakes
and then you just need a couple of spacers between wheel-rid and wheel-support and the tree is still!
spacers also increase the flexional stiffness of the tree
greetings
And then the more the tongue is long and more by force of what will be stunned, so bison will mount the hammered aberrant that will then be absolutely blocked, so here is the reliability of the calettator at the cost of a tab (and some father of the editor obviously). :biggrin:I'm the one with a lot of misunderstandings, since the reducer has the cutting edge, I prefer to put one in full length so that I can exploit all the potential of the reducer.
greetings
Mar
I didn't mean to say that:...I would like to put the tab in position a, since in that area there is also already a hole and realize also the quarry for the tongue we would go again to remove material to the section where the torque would be applied. . .