customised sections

[isoladimann]

Hi, guys. . a simple simple domandina, (with the search button I did not find what I needed, and if it was already dealt with the subject I apologize)
when you generate the "design sheet" 2d from a 3d model (which then is only a 3d model plant view), in making cross sections, I only want to "cut" completely (from one side to another) the particular ceh I want to dissect. . .
but if one needs to run the sections.. What do you mean, corner?
I'll explain. .
I draw a cube with 3 holes passing on a face, in different positions. .
I would like to be able to pass my section including all 3 holes centers, so as to have a section not straight but "scaled". I don't know if I explain. .
and instead I can only dissect with a "rect". . .
greetings and good lunch dear. . .

 

[e.ferriani]

Nothing to do, there is not even the interrupted section if it can console you. how much solid edge reamping, and to say that when I used it I always denigrated it, but only for the incompatibility with the software of the suppliers I had in the old company where I worked. There's no comparison.
Hi.

 

[isoladimann]

It's just that if one of them isn't the perfect program. But from a software with these potentials' (because it actually draws very quickly) certain things do not matter to you... at least, not being dedicated to engineering and parameterization' various, for some shortcomings is forgiving. . .
but this, which is widely oriented to mechanics, sometimes disappoints me a little.. Although I interfaced very well...

 

[Matteo]

Hello and apologize for the delay.

the question of detailing in sc is also discussed at the level of software developers.

the problem is: sc was born to offer a powerful 3d modeling tool, aimed at fem/cfd operators, cnc operators, molders, rhino/sketchup users looking for a more engineering software, graphics and designers. for this reason they have been developed as a priority function aimed above all to modeling (direct) in 3 dimensions.

Later (we talk about 2009) the commercial success of sc has also led to be required for applications as "one cad in the company", but is a recent development. at the moment this application sector, initially not expected, is considered by the developers and in the next release (r6 - commercial name sc2010) will be numerous improvements in the "detailing" sector.

in the specific case: the non-planar sections are coming in relatively short times, the implementation of the local sections has not yet been faced by the developers, so I anticipate longer times (sc2011? but it's just my guess).

my personal opinion, is that in a market like the Italian one, a 2d environment suitable for use as a generic cad would be very convenient, so I am pushing (as far as possible given my "weight" and that of the Italian market) to have a qualitative leap.

on solidedge considerations: if it is a great generic cad and in particular the putting on the table is very "smart" (as well as free). I have an excellent opinion of the product, but I am convinced that in specific sectors (direct modelling, or "sincorna" as they call it in itself, useful epr sempio to fem/cfd analysts or moldists) sc is more powerful (as is natural for a dedicated tool).

Hi.
Matteo

 

[e.ferriani]

then we wait for substantial and substantial improvements. I'm sorry, are you that matteo I think you are?
Hi.

 

[Matteo]

then we wait for substantial and substantial improvements. I'm sorry, are you that matteo I think you are?
Hi.

I am the matteo of caedevice (see signature), you probably know the other matteo, which (as sc) is a step above me