deepwater horizon

[sampom]

Do you hear the latest news about the "reasonable images" of bp images?http://www.corriere.it/esteri/10_lu...te_df8e8f62-9565-11df-91c3-00144f02aabe.shtmlthe responsible have apologized guaranteeing that this will not happen again (?!)
and sti caxxi!
Everyone in jail would send, without going through the street! closed company and palate compensation all the way (in addition to employees and with vitality pension), so much to reduce on the slab (in panties, but really) the "masters".
- But mat robe!

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[geppetto]

: eek: help!
from the site ansa:
London - while the controversy on the black tide is not applauded in the Gulf of Mexico, the British oil group british Petroeum announced that "within the next few weeks" will begin a new perforation off the Libyan coast, in the Gulf of Sirte, in the middle of the Mediterranean. the news, anticipated by the financial times, was confirmed by a spokesman of the company, david nicholas. The spokesman recalled that by virtue of a triple agreement signed in 2007, the bp obtained the authorization to make five perforations.

"we haven't calendared them yet", he added, specifying that each drilling takes six months or more. the new perforations will take place at a depth of about 5,700 feet (1,700 meters), slightly higher than that of the deepwater horizon, the platform located off the coast of the louisiana whose explosion last 20 April has caused the gigantic black tide that infests the Gulf of Mexico and the wave of controversy that has invested the British company....
Go on. .
Eek: help!
who intervenes, as you do, we stop them for pleasure. among you there are engineers and people definitely more prepared than me, please let us understand that it is not possible to admit such a thing.
bp must close and not move the area of interest of its disastrous experiments.
I'm sorry for the rash, but I'm very anxious about it.

 

[Fulvio Romano]

Unfortunately, or so, or new wars, or we go with solar, and we know that it is not possible. . .
What a situation of me@@a!

 

[Er Presidente]

: eek: help!
from the site ansa:
London - while the controversy on the black tide is not applauded in the Gulf of Mexico, the British oil group british Petroeum announced that "within the next few weeks" will begin a new perforation off the Libyan coast, in the Gulf of Sirte, in the middle of the Mediterranean. the news, anticipated by the financial times, was confirmed by a spokesman of the company, david nicholas. The spokesman recalled that by virtue of a triple agreement signed in 2007, the bp obtained the authorization to make five perforations.

"we haven't calendared them yet", he added, specifying that each drilling takes six months or more. the new perforations will take place at a depth of about 5,700 feet (1,700 meters), slightly higher than that of the deepwater horizon, the platform located off the coast of the louisiana whose explosion last 20 April has caused the gigantic black tide that infests the Gulf of Mexico and the wave of controversy that has invested the British company....
Go on. .
Eek: help!
who intervenes, as you do, we stop them for pleasure. among you there are engineers and people definitely more prepared than me, please let us understand that it is not possible to admit such a thing.
bp must close and not move the area of interest of its disastrous experiments.
I'm sorry for the rash, but I'm very anxious about it.

The problem is not the depth of the seabed in which it is drilled, but the depth of the drilling.
out of the libia there is not found in Mexican conditions, really outside the norm, in fact the exploded platform was experimental.
But trivelling in the gulf of the sirte proposes many other problems, let's not forget that the worst enemy of the Americans has long proclaimed all the gulf "internal sea".
perhaps we will understand today the reason for the attitude "tappetino" had from the "our", with the "tdouble", towards the libia.
the international needs of bp are far more important than our international image.

 

[Meccbell]

in fact I read today that the agreement with bp first provides, according to the laws of Libya (a smarter "nin" of ours), that all the operations of trivellation and also of subsequent exploitation of the deposits will be carried out by a mixed bp-government Libyan society and that, here is the difference, the same bp seems to be to transfer, to just a fidejussion, in the banks of the sovereign fund of the Libyan own

In this way, the colonel has secured itself against the 2 major risks of oil exploitation agreements:
the first risk is the possibility of accidents and consequent discourses during drilling operations (the compensations would be automatic and even "preventive" because the libia would instantly increase the share of shares deposited to fidejussion, selling it just as instantly, before a possible accident manifested itself in all its gravity causing the stock index to collapse).
the second risk, almost certain seen how oil companies act when working out of their own home, is the possibility that the dealership company (in this case the bp) does the steal, making the crest on the quantities of crude extracted from the wells and then pouring less royalties of the due.
In fact in this case being the company that exploits the wells and then " sells" the crude to bp also to participation of the Libyan government, the same society would make more useful, in virtue of the savings on the royalties, but then it should redistribute them to the members, among which just those who tried to enclose.

as you see the "cammelliere" dressed in sheet and sleeping under a "tenda" not only knows how to do business, or affaracci, its, but at the same time has discharged all the risks of any incidents on its and "our" friend upholstered, since already from now on, because of the currents of the Mediterranean low, it is perfectly that in case of dissection the great part of our oil "sbarche".
and in this case the bossi-fini would not serve a good thing.