• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

design of particular

  • Thread starter Thread starter Martakynghi
  • Start date Start date

Martakynghi

Guest
hello to all I have a doubt about the blind hole I wanted to know if it was okay as I represented it
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20200212_165211.webp
    IMG_20200212_165211.webp
    181.5 KB · Views: 40
  • IMG_20200212_165243.webp
    IMG_20200212_165243.webp
    39.4 KB · Views: 50
To tell the truth, I would like to understand who is the demente that has been doing the book lately with drawings where meaningless things are written.
I wonder, how come it will make a nominal diameter 32 have as a big step 1 mm....if the big step is 2mm and the end 1.5mm?
then a blind thread is represented as in the figure below:Screenshot_20200212_224125.webpwith indicated m32x1 and then its useful length of thread.
in the second slide you added the pre-workout quota and it's fine even if it would be better to do it from the tip to the top because the operator from there starts to count the depth.

Do you also make the potato arrows marta? is technical design....the arrows are toe....street....long twice and a half what are wide. You put less on them, and they're more technical.
 
To tell the truth, I would like to understand who is the demente that has been doing the book lately with drawings where meaningless things are written.
I wonder, how come it will make a nominal diameter 32 have as a big step 1 mm....if the big step is 2mm and the end 1.5mm?
then a blind thread is represented as in the figure below:View attachment 56271with indicated m32x1 and then its useful length of thread.
in the second slide you added the pre-workout quota and it's fine even if it would be better to do it from the tip to the top because the operator from there starts to count the depth.

Do you also make the potato arrows marta? is technical design....the arrows are toe....street....long twice and a half what are wide. You put less on them, and they're more technical.
Thank you so much I attach another particular design.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20200212_224643.webp
    IMG_20200212_224643.webp
    69.9 KB · Views: 25
  • IMG_20200212_224655.webp
    IMG_20200212_224655.webp
    128.7 KB · Views: 23
m16 big step is 1.5 and not 1....?
attach pdf with threads that is always useful. for each nominal one has the greatest step that is the big one, which normally omits to the diameter.

if the holes are blind, they are in sight from the high dotted and in section with the lines of the edges in sight. Instead you did the right section but the view from above the big hole you made it pass.
then there are quotas of thread depth and hole.
 

Attachments

Do all the lines with the team or the ruler... well... but the circles why they are drunk? compact or better cechiometer.Screenshot_20200212_231508.webpdrawings also quite clean....if you fix some socks you are perfect.

ah...nothing written in "hole" lanes.

actually would be n°2 m40x1. or m40x1 (2x) or (2x) m40x1.
 
m16 big step is 1.5 and not 1....?
attach pdf with threads that is always useful. for each nominal one has the greatest step that is the big one, which normally omits to the diameter.

if the holes are blind, they are in sight from the high dotted and in section with the lines of the edges in sight. Instead you did the right section but the view from above the big hole you made it pass.
then there are quotas of thread depth and hole.
but the professor told me m16 and step 1.5 big gives me exercise with threads to put. Then he told me that the blind hole is enough to represent it once and I represented it in pl .
 
m16 big step is 1.5 and not 1....?
attach pdf with threads that is always useful. for each nominal one has the greatest step that is the big one, which normally omits to the diameter.

if the holes are blind, they are in sight from the high dotted and in section with the lines of the edges in sight. Instead you did the right section but the view from above the big hole you made it pass.
then there are quotas of thread depth and hole.
Did I put it at the bigger hole instead of the other I forgot?
 
but the professor told me m16 and step 1.5 big gives me exercise with threads to put. Then he told me that the blind hole is enough to represent it once and I represented it in pl .
then what are the dashes lines in the view in the plant above all parallels about 1mm ends?Screenshot_20200213_071809_com.android.chrome.webp
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top