diffuseon? !

[epasinet]

Ragaz someone can tell me if there are worldwide data of vectorworks and maybe some other software in the sector like archicad, autocad and beautiful company? ! ?

I am curious to know how much underrated is a program to say a little extraordinarily, as vectorworks!

 

[pla]

I don't know the official autodesk data. the nemetschek group declares that the diffusion of their products is:
vectorworks = more than 450.000 licenses
archicad = more than 100,000 licenses
allplan = more than 60,000 licenses

for which vw is probly the second cad system as diffusion to the world.

 

[epasinet]

I don't know the official autodesk data. the nemetschek group declares that the diffusion of their products is:
vectorworks = more than 450.000 licenses
archicad = more than 100,000 licenses
allplan = more than 60,000 licenses

for which vw is probly the second cad system as diffusion to the world.

Are you kidding me? i.e. vectorworks worldwide is more widespread than archicad and allplan!?!?!? ! ! ?
but then sito vector is a power!? !
I would be curious to know the number of autocad licenses at this point!

 

[Marcogeo]

I have the impression that thanks to the lt version and to the various declinations in other software that exploit the "motor", autocad has much more consistent numbers and we talk about millions of licenses. this said I would never change vectorworks with autocad that I think too slender and arzigogular even in professional use. Moreover in autocad, in front of a thousand thousand functions, only a few are really useful and used profitably.

 

[lory.b]

there is a substantial difference between acad and vw. the first is a generic cad. vw was born for architecture.
It is not a banal difference and develops in years of constant and assiduous work of exchange of ideas and proposals among professionals of the sector and programmers engineers.
who makes architecture should be much more comfortable using a specific software, which speaks our language, rather than a generic one.
I do.

 

[epasinet]

there is a substantial difference between acad and vw. the first is a generic cad. vw was born for architecture.
It is not a banal difference and develops in years of constant and assiduous work of exchange of ideas and proposals among professionals of the sector and programmers engineers.
who makes architecture should be much more comfortable using a specific software, which speaks our language, rather than a generic one.
I do.

Effectively I have always designed architecture with autocad lt and shaped with lightwave3d but after trying vw I am ecstatic.

 

[Marcogeo]

there is a substantial difference between acad and vw. the first is a generic cad. vw was born for architecture.
It is not a banal difference and develops in years of constant and assiduous work of exchange of ideas and proposals among professionals of the sector and programmers engineers.
who makes architecture should be much more comfortable using a specific software, which speaks our language, rather than a generic one.
I do.

In fact I had not expanded the scope of autocad that being a tyraline is good also to make the table of the shopping list but then you do not make the list because it is too difficult to "centre" the various cells:tongue:

In fact the comparison should only be done for architectural use but having these data about autocad I think it is impossible.

 

[pla]

judging a product only from its diffusion is a little reduced. would be like to say that windows is better than mac os x just because there are more pcs around:smile:

 

[zetadierre]

I don't know the official autodesk data. the nemetschek group declares that the diffusion of their products is:
vectorworks = more than 450.000 licenses
archicad = more than 100,000 licenses
allplan = more than 60,000 licenses

for which vw is probly the second cad system as diffusion to the world.

source? Is there a link?

 

[pla]

find the data on the company website:http://www.nemetschek.com/en/home/the_company/brand_portfolio/vectorworks.html

 

[Marcogeo]

surrounding around whichever you change always

 

[zetadierre]

find the data on the company website:http://www.nemetschek.com/en/home/the_company/brand_portfolio/vectorworks.html

thanks to the information

 

[epasinet]

You know what the problem is? ! ?
that vectorworks alias minicad seems to me has always been used mainly in architectural field on mac, while autocad is used in many more sectors such as engineering and mechanics! therefore it is difficult to compare the number of vectorworks licenses with the number of autocad licenses addressed to the same areas in which vectorworks works!
Moreover there is to say that autocad has so much diffusion in the 2d thanks to the version lt that has nothing to share with the potential of vw basic and that therefore can hardly find comparison! !
What do you say?

 

[render54]

I can say that at the second meeting on revit
2 months ago we were told that the number of licenses revit in Italy was
around 10,000

 

[pla]

autocad has a lot of diffusion in 2d thanks to the lt version that has nothing to share with the potential of vw basic

if you compare prices, lt and vw basic cost almost equal, so the two products are directly comparable. on which it is better, should you decide on the basis of functionality and not to spread, or not?

 

[Simconti]

if you compare prices, lt and vw basic cost almost equal, so the two products are directly comparable. on which it is better, should you decide on the basis of functionality and not to spread, or not?

Yes, indeed.

 

[lory.b]

vectorworks alias minicad seems to have always been used mainly in architectural field on mac, while autocad is used in many more sectors such as engineering and mechanics! therefore it is difficult to compare the number of vectorworks licenses with the number of autocad licenses addressed to the same areas in which vectorworks works!

In my opinion, it makes no sense to make this kind of comparison.
Let's talk about tools for work. We choose what we think best suited to our way of facing the design and leave aside the numbers. above all, it would be more correct to compare, if you just can not do without, similar tools, then cad/bim, then vw with archicad with allplan, revit, etc., leaving aside acad that is all another kind.

Moreover there is to say that autocad has so much diffusion in the 2d thanks to the version lt that has nothing to share with the potential of vw basic and that therefore can hardly find comparison! !
What do you say?

minicad was born on mac but, if not erro, already version 6 or 7 turned on windows when still acad 12 was on dos.
I did my first computer exam at the university in '96... and already there were walls as an object... ;-)
I do.

 

[epasinet]

good lory! vectorw "needs" to compare it with bim parametric programs but sin that you position all over 5'000euri! then in price/performance ratio the comparison is ostico in departure!
Compare vw basic with autocad lt in drawing 2d seems interesting to me, unfortunately I do not know yet so well vw to be able to compare it on a field like drawing and printing 2d! from what I do not find anything in autocad that you can not do as well with vw, but I abstain from giving a judgment.