distinguished advanced base

[Alex70]

Hi.
I ask if there is the possibility to recall in the table generated by "advanced basic distinction" the parts grouped by "comodity" in a component.
automatically the "advanced base" command considers the components as axioms.

Thank you.

 

[bandy]

I gave it to him! I carry an excel file from analysis --> distinct base (preimposed the columns I want before)
then I put the file "csv" in the table if not every slight crap you update the table si duu balls!! !
is not a solution to a cad that from a few answers, being old as noé

 

[tomahawk64]

Good morning to all,
I would like to know how it can be exported into the separate components of a set (excel format) the 3 dimensions, or the two for a round indicating the maximum bulk of the part?
I thank in advance all those who will answer me.

 

[ferrezio]

if you want to use the distinct base advanced by drawing, the thing is a bit complex since you have to act on the "standard" catia menu, i.e. create a custom catia environment.

If you want to extrapolate it from product "bill of material" command, you have to create your interface by choosing the various formatting entries.
The latter has the problem that does not remain memorized and will be erased at the shutdown of the pc, so if you have to repeat the creation of distinct voices.

Hi.

 

[tomahawk64]

thanks ferrezio, always available.
but perhaps I misjudged the question or did not understand the answer.
reformulate better:
it is possible to customize the distinct base of catia in excel format with the addition of parameters ( x example the 3 sizes ), customized?
If you have the answer ( surely yes, I have no doubts), you can kindly shed light on me......
thanks again x your patience.
Hi.

 

[ferrezio]

product (1)
in reviews (2) choose bill of material
go to define format (3)
clear the voices to define the distinct bases (4 and 5)
from the main panel do save as (6) and choose as excel format.

Hi.

 

[tomahawk64]

mythical ferrity.
Try it and it's okay.
only one last clarification: in the excel table in the box with the numerical values shown, it also puts the unit of measurement.
question: Is it possible to export how much you explained earlier but with the possibility of having only the value?

I have to meet you at least one dinner... .
Thank you very much
Hi.

 

[mcbramby]

If you think you'll take advantage of the distinct advanced base, just as it says ferrezio you'll lose your configuration to shut off the cai. xò there is a "truck" (maybe I already explained it somewhere) , you can record a macro mind configure the distinct (practically record what you do) and then put the macro in a button ............ just click on the button to have your configuration every time you need it.

 

[tomahawk64]

to this is all clear,
but I kindly asked if you could remove the "mm" from the fields.
I noticed that if you do the table and get out in excel it's okay. while if you carry out in excel, the distint takes the unit of measurement in the field of the number. Boh! ! !
Do you have a solution?
Thank you in advance.
Hi.

 

[ferrezio]

to this is all clear,
but I kindly asked if you could remove the "mm" from the fields.
I noticed that if you do the table and get out in excel it's okay. while if you carry out in excel, the distint takes the unit of measurement in the field of the number. Boh! ! !
Do you have a solution?
Thank you in advance.
Hi.

it would be enough to make a "replace" in excel of the field " mm" (with a space before the mm) with no character.

or

when you create the parameter in the property window, for the size of the block, choose "real" type parameter (eg we call x_dim).
After that, when you create the association formula, through the "formula" function (f(x))), between the "length" type parameter (which we call x_length) and the property parameter (x_dim), you just split it by 1 mm (i.e. create the "x_length"/1 mm formula).

Hi.

 

[tomahawk64]

thanks to the ferretious help, as always very competent.
hello and the next...

 

[Vittorio]

Good morning to all and I join the discussion.
any of you have found the system to automatically calculate the max size of the partbody?. I know that in the machining module there is a command that calculates the size max x...y...z... but if you do not have the license of this module, how do you do it? This is what I need to put in the separate base, the size of the piece.

thank you all

 

[bandy]

I'm sorry if I don't open a new discussion but I'd like to know how it's possible that if I use the distinct advanced catia base, I also explode what's under the sub-axis? Is there a way to stop the distinct level 1 of the product tree? as always thanks

 

[ferrezio]

just remove the check (a) on the property panel of the parts that you do not want to re-epilogate in bom.

Hi.

 

[bandy]

Thank you.
I had done some tests but the propitiation turned on and changed for all the details inside the axieme (viteria)
Okay, it works!
then I take advantage of it to ask you if you can fix the size of the columns and rows of the distinct base at the table.
each update is stretching. Is there a chance?

 

[bandy]

Sorry but as I had already learned it does not work thoroughly. If I spend the option in the children of a sub-product no longer appear the parts in his table, then it is not functional. I would need different options for each set.

 

[bandy]

Sorry but as I had already learned that it does not work thoroughly. In fact, if I turn off the option in the children of a sub-product, I do not appear in his table anymore, it is not good. I would need different options for each set.

 

[ferrezio]

Sorry but as I had already learned that it does not work thoroughly. In fact, if I turn off the option in the children of a sub-product, I do not appear in his table anymore, it is not good. I would need different options for each set.

Before doing this, you need to define the rules.
Take into account that the option is only valid in the very moment you're working on, if I re-create a new set with common parts to the previous one that doesn't happen.

for how I think it, all parts are always counted, so the option I use only in specific cases (e.g. creating part associated in a set, as you could do for a weld, and its reworked).

so it remains only the difficulty of numbering and identifying subaxis, which I can distinguish in two groups:

1. purchase
2. production

for on the first you could apply the concept of associated part or model all parts in a catpar.
for the second, you perform the manual numbering (or manual numbering in the pdm).

Hi.

 

[bandy]

as you can see in the image I made a product with inside a part1 at the 1st level and another product with inside part 1
a) I don't understand why the numbering skips the product 2 and only numbers its part.
b) if I place acqusto or production on product 2 I have no changes.
c) if I put part 1 in product 2 in "do not display the distinct material" I do not see it in the separate product table 2.
(d) I would not like to summarize (necessary if the products are numbered at the 1st level)

If you can answer point by point, because I don't understand the philosophy of management of this thing.
solidworks, his younger son, has more options......... .

Thank you for your patience