effective roughness cam machining

[rinato]

Save to all, by chance someone performs tests/checks on the actual ridge height resulting from 3d machining in which he set it as a "guide" parameter of the processing step?
I should mill surfaces in 3d with the bond of roughness (in theory ra) not pushed: Let's say, standing on top of 3.2. but the ridge height in the cam is not ra (perhaps rz?) . so I wanted to understand that paramentro set, p.e., with a sup. type horizontal cylinder ø35 and ø10 spherical, ideally worked with the "parallel plates".
of course I have no way to do tests on the final piece; At the most, I could make "tamps" to lose in small dimensions, x check the result.
thanks for any info,
Rianto.

 

[mtbnicola]

in cam environment and in strategy options when choosing the step comes out the theoretical ridge, otherwise you can always draw it and see the resulting.

 

[rinato]

hi, I forgot this post.
Yes, I did some graphic tests, even saving and analyzing for points the stl resulting from the simulation.
then the real piece was "Russian" as required and worked well.
Say hi.