experienced simulationxpress - error on simple beam - where am i wrong?

[reggio]

hello to all, not to you, but here on our sw and simulationxpress stations behave like a capricious child: even the simplest things, sometimes it solves them other times not ...

this tour refuses to verify a simple beam to "t" ...
You could tell me where I was wrong and how can I "convince him"?
video

 

[biz]

says "mesh failed."
what mesh parameters did you set? You're probably doing too big a mesh.

 

[biz]

I see now: you are meshando a thin tubular. I highly recommend using beam elements, not tet10. Now, be careful: to use beam you have to split the two tube logs.

 

[reggio]

says "mesh failed."
what mesh parameters did you set? You're probably doing too big a mesh.

ciao News Thank you.!

"grossolana"? I always thought that in these cases of mesh failure, I had to go from middle to coarse so as to "affaticate" less calculations with larger and radiant triangles .. instead I only understand now that, if it fails, you have to make end the mesh and now works!!

I see now: you are meshando a thin tubular. I highly recommend using beam elements, not tet10. Now, be careful: to use beam you have to split the two tube logs.

beam? What does that mean, how would you do that? (yes with my express? )
tet10 what is that?

Why split? Do you want to split the cross with the mount? Why? What advantages would it give?

 

[biz]

_Being too loose (the mesh) fails to discuss geometry correctly.

_beam: they are 1d elements that are used when the object you have to discuss can be reduced to a beam, according to the dictates of the science of construction. a size prevails on the other two and the section is constant.

_tet10: they are 3d tetrahedral elements of the second order (with 10 knots) and are used to discrete complex geometries or however not discrete with other elements.

Do you do it with your express? I don't know.

_split because you have two beams (in the last image you posted 4)

the advantages of using beam elements compared to solid elemetes:
_less computing resources used
_more ease in discretizing geometry
_ absence of localized hotspots (i.e. numerical singularities in tubular intersections)

 

[biz]

Do you do with my express?

you must try to see from the tree on the element you want to treat as beam (right mouse button) if there is the word "treated as beam".

 

[reggio]

you must try to see from the tree on the element you want to treat as beam (right mouse button) if there is the word "treated as beam".

I think I understand what you mean, no with express can not - express is the simulator "of the poor" is limited, you probably have premium swx.

even for the rest I seem to have understood your suggestions = "simplify"

Anyway, I solved the mesh, thank you!