• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

eyewear design with solidworks

  • Thread starter Thread starter jt_cad
  • Start date Start date

jt_cad

Guest
Bye to all,
for professional reasons I have used in the past solidworks for different merceologic sectors, but this time I am facing the market "eyewear".
I wanted to ask you if someone among you had the opportunity to collide with this type of design with solidworks and if you found problems with other softwaremagari if you also have some "right" to give me.
I used rhino and solidthinking.. .

Thank you so much!! ! !
 
Given the (unjustly) bad reputation of solidworks in industrial design, I wonder why you chose it instead of the software you used earlier.. .
 
Given the (unjustly) bad reputation of solidworks in industrial design, I wonder why you chose it instead of the software you used earlier.. .
Hi.
because I do not justify his bad reputation. I found myself well therefore being now in the phase of "research" of valid alternatives, it has made a turn of opinions but in the eyewear field there have been no significant experiences with parametric sofware "solids", catia apart.
solidthinking is "dead" and in any case it was a parametric but always of surfaces, also did not have a table set. great for renderings, at the time it was fine, now it needs something more "technical".
rhino, is not parametric, works with surfaces and the table "not in real time" is a limit.
 
Hi.
because I do not justify his bad reputation. I found myself well therefore being now in the phase of "research" of valid alternatives, it has made a turn of opinions but in the eyewear field there have been no significant experiences with parametric sofware "solids", catia apart.
solidthinking is "dead" and in any case it was a parametric but always of surfaces, also did not have a table set. great for renderings, at the time it was fine, now it needs something more "technical".
rhino, is not parametric, works with surfaces and the table "not in real time" is a limit.
Thank you for your patience. As for me the only thing I find annoying with solidworks is the farraginosity of selection or the hiding/revisual body in the parts with many bodies. keeping separate surfaces is not generally good.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top