features specchiate con sw

[ceschi1959]

as known sw and nx adopt the same 'motor' and that is parasolid. They tell me about different behaviors between the two cads in mirroring the features. The example is this: I have two identical parallelepipeds, I execute a fitting on both, I deform the opposite face in one case holding the edge below, in the other holding firm the edge above. I mirror the feature fitting and in the first case fails while in the second it works.
I ask some good soul to do this with sw to see if, with this cad, it works in both cases.
thank you in advance to those who will want to answer.
c.

 

[cacciatorino]

solid edge does the same thing shown in your catches.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I think it is normal because if the symmetry axis is created before the sform in the case of lower fixed edge the upper edge is no longer symmetrical to the other (in fact the mirrored ray falls into the void) memtre in the case of higher fixed edge even with the sform remains symmetrical.

 

[ceschi1959]

Thank you. @cacciatorino e a @massivonweizen , I asked for proof proprio con sw pulled in this thread:

https://community.sw.siemens.com/s/...seisar/mirror-feature-doesnt-replicate-blends

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Thank you. @cacciatorino e a @massivonweizen , I asked for proof proprio con sw pulled in this thread:

https://community.sw.siemens.com/s/...seisar/mirror-feature-doesnt-replicate-blends

mine is just a reasoning, not using more solidworks I have no way to test.

 

[ceschi1959]

mine is just a reasoning, not using more solidworks I have no way to test.

and it's the reasoning I'm doing too, doesn't make any sense to mirror such features.

 

[re_solidworks]

as known sw and nx adopt the same 'motor' and that is parasolid. They tell me about different behaviors between the two cads in mirroring the features. The example is this: I have two identical parallelepipeds, I execute a fitting on both, I deform the opposite face in one case holding the edge below, in the other holding firm the edge above. I mirror the feature fitting and in the first case fails while in the second it works.
I ask some good soul to do this with sw to see if, with this cad, it works in both cases.
thank you in advance to those who will want to answer.
c.View attachment 69156

is the mirroring plan that passes through the center of both parallelepipeds by cutting them in half?

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

sw 2023.

edit: as you can see from the image the face of the fitting is mirrored and the bodies are cut. is not a real replica of the featureso it goes wrong


edit 2: the error is due to an incorrect definition of the scope of the function. manually selecting the affected body the result is this

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

View attachment 69161sw 2023.

edit: as you can see from the image the face of the fitting is mirrored and the bodies are cut. is not a real replica of the featureView attachment 69162so it goes wrong


edit 2: the error is due to an incorrect definition of the scope of the function. manually selecting the affected body the result is thisView attachment 69165

It happens because you activated the geometric repetition, if you disable the repetition should not go well. you should know if nx has the same option (call no if _ asked the question)

I didn't understand how you got it. .

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

I didn't understand how you got it. .

if you see the previous image, where the feature manager is visible, in "in the context of the function" the automatic selection is checked.
If I remove the tick and manually select the affected body, the connection is executed in that way.