fori sulamiera spy

[SE-Bologna]

Hello, everyone.
I have a metal sheet where I must have holes at a uniform distance (distance measured along the path).
So I remove the fold, I make the holes, and I fill the sheet.
problem: the holes disappear (not all) in the flat repetition therefore the laser operator must remake them on the file to be put in the machine.

I have several plates, not only the one attached, even with several dips. the problem remains with a number of holes, displayed in the flat repetition, apparently random.

I don't need holes circular after the fold. in any case the radius of the displacement is very large compared to the diameter of the holes. in some details the holes are also threaded and after the fold the thread continues to work properly.

thanks for the help

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

is it not more convenient and precise to make holes on the displacement?

 

[SE-Bologna]

I didn't understand the answer.
Do you want to make holes (on cad) after the fold?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

you have a metal sheet
you want the holes to be at a uniform distance on the sheet metal

then do the holes on the sheet metal and when you get the development you have the holes in the correct position with the correct shape to give the laser

 

[SE-Bologna]

my correct position is every 100mm along the path from a first hole.
I want them to be at a uniform distance **I want the path**
in other pieces I have different magnets with different rays.
in any case I would like to solve the problem of *sharing* of holes on the attached file

 

[re_solidworks]

I looked at your file, I did some tests but I couldn't figure out what the cause of the problem is. I remodeled and it works, I was sure because I used this method several times.

 

[SE-Bologna]

found, is factor k to 0.0001
It's a customer's tax. Now I see if it's editable.

thanks, your file was crucial to compare!

 

[re_solidworks]

found, is factor k to 0.0001
It's a customer's tax. Now I see if it's editable.

thanks, your file was crucial to compare!

I'm happy. However, it is a somewhat strange behaviour and should be reported to solidworks.