Anchorage
Guest
as per title:
http://help.autodesk.com/view/rvt/2017/ita/Buona Lettura a Mutu
http://help.autodesk.com/view/rvt/2017/ita/Buona Lettura a Mutu
fabio.revit
Guest
to the face of novelties
more and more confirmation is that the road taken by revit is to be a new autocad, elephant and oversized, with always minor additions and less suitable for small local realities.
Alfredo Medina
Guest
the list of news from April and only what we have not seen yet. However, during the year we received other news. and only that they are not all together as they were doing a few years ago.
However, it is true that there was a greater number of new things during the first years of development. especially because there were more things to do, of course.
your comment on revit as only an improved version of autocad is entirely inaccurate.
However, it is true that there was a greater number of new things during the first years of development. especially because there were more things to do, of course.
your comment on revit as only an improved version of autocad is entirely inaccurate.
fabio.revit
Guest
Maybe I didn't explain: the reference to autocad is that they are making a software too generic, that does everything and more, with thousands of functions also of high complexity and power but useless to the average user.
what sense does it have to introduce the adaptors, of incredible potential, but that force the average user, to use them, to make a course as a programmer and subtract time to architectural design?
I make the architect, design buildings, not library elements.
as I have already said elsewhere, after ten years of revit and almost 20 thousand euros of investment, in the next two years I will change (with regret) software design for these reasons.
fabio
Alfredo Medina
Guest
Look at this ramp. and a dificile element to model with the instrumento de "pavimento". especially there are two floors, one on the other, for technical issues. an adaptive family could solve this problem in a short time and with precision. the user (architect) does not need to be or become a programmer to find a creative solution that solves the problem. have a software that offers many instruments and a good thing to have sewing the project has some difficult problems.
fabio.revit
Guest
I think that a software must have ready tools to meet and user needs, so tools that predict (in the limit of possible) the most common features and others that give flexibility. this because my work is not finding software solutions, but architectural solutions. revit allows you to do almost everything but with a waste of too much energy. and then, when the projects become too complex loses flexibility in the revision/modification phase. constraints stiffen and layer too, sometimes move, 10 cm a wall or copy a window becomes almost impossible.
as already mentioned, my opinion is that they should streamline it but, above all, start adapting it to the modus operandi of the architects
eco77
Guest
Can I ask you what software are you going to pass? not to make comparisons, only curiosity
alpearchitetto
Guest
hi fabio I agree in part with what you say, in fact the last versions are off course with those thinking in architectural "mode". revit is becoming more and more brainy! other software... a real problem. I followed a propedeutic course of allplan 2016 and without anything to remove this program seemed even more complicated than revit. I sincerely broke up with having to pay upgrades that then such are not, when I think about the large array of "colleges" that uses well-cryed programs without taking a penny from the pocket. and I'm surprised that autodesk knows and doesn't do anything, except maybe write to those who regularly pay licenses to know the serial number, but these are the contradictions of our country. Good job
fabio.revit
Guest
I am very enjoying vectorworks architect of which I have seen tutorials, materials etc.
fantastic solid modeler, Italian localization boost, add on oriented to the architectural process and at decent prices.
in second line archicad, I used it from 1997 to 2006 and still now use it to introduce the practitioners to cad 3d (I stopped to version 7.03 so not yet bim) that is still a great software. and graphisoft is making crazy offers for those who want to return: they allow me to return to update, after ten years, with 1500 euros!!! !
fabio.revit
Guest
I didn't take the spark, so I don't know him.
for the licensing speech, it is from 1997 that on the pcs of my study there are no programs taorccati, rather I have passed to open source (open office in place of office, gimp instead of photoshop, inkscape instead of ai, etc etc etc) but it is a policy that certain software house, obviously, do not encourage.