harmonised standards for drawing systems

[pollo]

good morning to all, I have been looking for some reference standards for cold steel drawing machines.
of course it is found everything (for the bronze trafile of the pasta, on the size of the spaghetti, on the characteristics that must have the steel wires produced by drawing), but the classic "machines for drawing - safety" does not jump out. of course I have already extended the search on the site one and the community, but nothing
I also tried to ask national builders and not (also big ones), but it seems that it is or an industrial secret worse than the third of fatima, or that it is talking Martian.
I also tried to search the reverse (on the extrusion), hoping that they also contemplate the plotters, but obviously it is not.
Some of you have some suggestions to give me.
Thank you.

 

[meccanicamg]

Directive on machinery and harmonized standards. It's like another car. She calls in and see what they tell you, otherwise she pays a security advisor and tells you everything.

 

[pollo]

thanks thanks
In fact, a harmonized standard of type gives me very detailed information and not least its respect is presumption of conformity to the directive.
Moreover, from the security point of view, it is not an opinion thrown down by a consultant, although it was the best, but it is the official opinion of the technical committee of the European community, and as such it has a background value slightly less questionable than any other.
Of course, it is always a machine and as such the 12100 is applicable, but it is only the first step.
the norms of type c enter in a detail that the 12100 can not do. If you take for example that of the swivel arm cranes, see that it allows you to access the dangerous zones of the rotating raddle also in operation, through special measures, also of a managerial character. 12100 would make you put interlocked gates with rotation, and good night at inspections. In the event of an accident, the judge shall take account of it.
The unit couldn't answer.
thanks the same
Hi.

 

[gerod]

If you do not find the norm of type and it has obviously not been drafted!
use type a and b norms or take stock of type c standards of similar machines. is always an extra help
Hi.

 

[pollo]

Thanks Gerod
I try that way
In fact, I was thinking of alternative industry standards (e.g. for fem lifting equipment, or for the American steel industry).
Hi.

 

[meccanicamg]

However, the consultants do this because they do all the documentation for each other, so risk analysis and more specific. are the same people who do the periciousness when there are accidents or disputes about it, they are people enrolled in the albo and who have continuous training, which in a company is not always possible to follow and chase.