help modeling

[Hope]

I should scan the parallelepiped that you see in the image to insert a tube inside it.
the tube descends from above and to explain it better I represented it in several positions.
Do you have any idea how I can create such a groove?
I tried to use the copy of the edge but the rays of the tube does not take them and if even it took them I imagine that
the modeling would be little stable during changes/regeneration.

Thank you for your help!

 

[maxopus]

What do you mean by "scanting"?
You want to subtract material to the parallelepiped with the tube?
If so, in the environment together you have to use the command modification> operation with components

 

[Hope]

Hello and thank you for the answer.
I would like to subtract material to the parallelepiped with the tube but I think I have not explained well.
the subtraction of the material I would like to do it with a feature within the parallelepiped part (I don't want links with other components of the axieme) as if it was an extrusion that simulates the envelope of the positions assumed by the tube during the vertical translation. the image is only representative of some moments in which the tube fits.
I hope (but I don't think) that I have explained the question.

 

[Preparation-H]

the "tube" if you make it surface and then change -> solidifies?

Hi.
p-h

 

[maxopus]

After you have realized the parallelepipedo, build a sweep with variable section and activate the mode "take material.

 

[Hope]

Hi, I'll try again. Thanks anyway for the patience! !
from the attached image you can see the imprint that leaves a simple tube to l. but it is a case quite semlica compared to the images previously sent.
maxopus, I think I understand what you mean when you propose to use the variable section sweep but in this way I do not get the envelope given by vertical translation. I think it's too hard to explain :frown:

 

[mariuss.r]

Hi, I'll try again. Thanks anyway for the patience! !
from the attached image you can see the imprint that leaves a simple tube to l. but it is a case quite semlica compared to the images previously sent.
maxopus, I think I understand what you mean when you propose to use the variable section sweep but in this way I do not get the envelope given by vertical translation. I think it's too hard to explain :frown:

that pipe, to move from the "outside parallelepiped" position to the "inside parallelepiped" position, will certainly follow a trajectory.

It will be enough to create a closed surface generated by a section (median section of the tube) along the trajectory described above, and then subtract it to the parallelepipedo

If the trajectory is a vertical one, then it's even easier.
create the superfluous tube in the "all in" position, cut it with a shiluette curve and then extrude the edges to the top, and finally subtract it to the parallelepiped.

 

[maxopus]

Hi, I'll try again. Thanks anyway for the patience! !
from the attached image you can see the imprint that leaves a simple tube to l. but it is a case quite semlica compared to the images previously sent.
maxopus, I think I understand what you mean when you propose to use the variable section sweep but in this way I do not get the envelope given by vertical translation. I think it's too hard to explain :frown:

look at the attached file

 

[simra]

implemented the maxopus file a bit coarsely. . .

 

[Hope]

That was exactly what I wanted to do.
thank you all!!!!